Inclusion in the classroom has been a topic of conversation throughout the history of organized education. Incorporating special education students with general education students, both groups are given a unique opportunity to learn and grow together rather than in separate environments. In Kerri Phillips’ article, “Inclusive Education,” she describes inclusive learning as “the goal of inclusive practices is to plan and devise an intervention option that is unique in meeting the disabled individual 's educational needs” (Phillips, 1) Some argue that combining both types of students into one classroom may be detrimental to the other, while many scholars and organizations argue in favor of inclusive classrooms that allow all students to learn in environments that are molded to the individual students. By looking at the various elements that make an inclusive classroom superior to a regular classroom, it will be apparent that children fortunate enough to be in a cutting edge, innovative, and inclusive classrooms will have the leg up in the rest of their academic and
Inclusion in the Public School Classroom
What do we do with children with disabilities in the public school? Do we include them in the general education class with the “regular” learning population or do we separate them to learn in a special environment more suited to their needs? The problem is many people have argued what is most effective, full inclusion where students with all ranges of disabilities are included in regular education classes for the entire day, or partial inclusion where children spend part of their day in a regular education setting and the rest of the day in a special education or resource class for the opportunity to work in a smaller group setting on specific needs. The need for care for children with identified disabilities both physical and learning continues to grow and the controversy continues.
What is inclusion?
The movement toward full inclusion of special education students in general education setting has brought special education to a crossroad and stirred considerable debate on its future direction. Proponents of full inclusion argue that the needs of students in general education. Full inclusion is "an approach on which students who are disabled or at risk receive all instruction in a regular classroom setting" (Hardman, Drew, Egan, & Wolf, 1993). Those who are for inclusion claim that segregated programs are detrimental to students and do not meet the original goals for special education(). Recent analysis show a small to moderate beneficial effect of inclusion education on the academic and social outcome of special needs children. Those who support inclusion believe that the child always should begin in the regular environment and only be removed only when appropriate services cannot be provided in the regular classroom. Physical accommodations, sufficient personnel, staff development and technical assistance, and technical collaboration are all brought into the classroom to assist the special needs child in a regular classroom. Another study assessing the effectiveness of inclusion was done at John Hopkins University. In a school-wide restructuring program called, Success for All, student achievement was measured and several positive changes were noticed: a reduced fear of human differences accompanied by increases comfort and awareness, growth in social cognition, improvement in self- concept of non-disabled students, development of personal principles and ability to assume an advocacy role toward their peers and friends with disabilities, and warm and caring friendships. Inclusion is more effective when students with special need are placed in a general education classroom after adequate planning. Inclusion does not mean unilateral changes in student's placements without appropriate preparation.
Many children have had learning disabilities for many years. Each year more and more of these children are being helped. Schools are working to improve their special education programs and to have all kinds of students work together in the same classroom. The practice of inclusion was started because educators felt that special needs students would achieve more in traditional classrooms with non-learning disabled students than they would in special education classes. However, research findings suggest that there really is no difference in academic achievement levels for special needs students when they are placed in regular classrooms.
Inclusion is considered the Least Restrictive Environment, or “LRE” for a high majority of special education students. The IDEA, or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1975, mandates that children and youth ages 3-21 with disabilities be provided a free and appropriate public education. According to the National Center for Education (2011), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act describes the least restrictive environment is the environment in which special education students can be educated in with their normal functioning peers. Although the mandate of least restrictive environment was written into the law in the 1970s, it has taken much longer for it to be implemented in schools settings. In the mid to late 1970s, individuals with disabilities were primarily educated in separate classrooms away from their same age peers and rarely encountered students without disabilities (Swain & Nordness, 2012). Luckily for students, the way in which our education systems educate students with disabilities has improved. In the 1980s, “mainstreaming” became a popular way to educate disabled students. The mainstreaming philosophy focused on allowing individuals with disabilities to participate in courses such as music, art, physical education, and some content classes. Disabled students would be allowed to participate in these traditional academic content courses if they were able to keep up with the traditional academic content standards with little additional supports (Swain & Nordness, 2012). Implementing the mainstreaming method into the classroom was an improvement to the way schools educated special education students. Currently, school districts are practicing inclusion more frequently than in the past. St...
The idea of inclusion within a classroom tends to breed controversy from many people. Currently there is no clear consensus on a definition of inclusion (Heward, 2006). There are many different views on how students with disabilities should be handled. Those views ranged from students being fully included, partially included, or not included at all in mainstream schooling. Different descriptions of inclusion tend to reflect the person's own opinions towards it. People who feel students should not be included in the classroom focus on the negative characteristics of inclusion, such as the challenges of developing plans for students as well as the hard work it requires to incorporate those plans. However, studies show that full inclusion has many benefits to the students, for both students with disabilities as well as students without them. Inclusion has shown to improve the student's social skills, encourage communication, inspire laws and regulations, and improve the overall schooling experience (Gargiulo, 2012). Although it will take longer then some would like or have the patience for, full inclusion can be done in the classroom, with its benefits outweighing the hard work that it requires.
Under the Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act (IDEA) all students with disabilities are to have a free and appropriate public education (Woolfolk, 2010). Inclusion falls under this act because IDEA requires states to develop procedures for educating each child in the least restrictive environment (Woolfolk, 2010). Inclusion may be defined as 100% placement in age-appropriate general education classes or the integration of all students including those with severe disabilities (Idol, 1997). With the full inclusion of disabled children in general education classroom issues developed with the social interactions and peer acceptance of both groups. Research has shown that students with disabilities are less likely to be accepted and more likely to be rejected than non-disabled st...
The children who benefit from the Special Education program are learning disabled. The National Center for Learning Disabilities states that children with learning disabilities have a “neurological disorder that affects the brain’s ability to receive process, store and respond to information.” There has been a long running debate on the best way to educate children with learning disabilities or LD. Some feel inclusion is the most beneficial method for educating children with LD. As defined by Jean B. Crockett and James M. Kauffman in The Least Restrictive Environment, inclusion is where children with disabilities are placed in regular education classes for the entire school day and are accompanied by special education teachers or aides for subjects where they need extra help (1). Others feel mainstreaming is the best option for students with LD.
As a student who has a learning disability, the idea of inclusion in the classroom is very important to me. My learning disability may not be noticeable to everyone but there were still times in school that I needed my teachers to make accommodations ...
Inclusion has become increasingly important in education in recent years, with the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act being passed in 2004 to ensure equality in our system. In summary, inclusion is the idea of there being no child...