Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
analysis of the movie in the heat of the night
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: analysis of the movie in the heat of the night
The movie I was assigned was, In the Heat of the Night starring Sidney Poitier and Rod Steiger. This film took place during the late 1960’s in Mississippi, where Virgil Tibbs, a black Philadelphia homicide detective, is traveling. Upon his travel, he unintentionally gets involved in a murder investigation of a business man. He was first accused of committing this murder when a police officer became suspicious of him. After they determined his innocence’s, he was then asked to help solve the case because of his vast knowledge and experience dealing with homicide crimes. He eventually agreed to help because he knew it was the right thing to do. The process for finding the killer was determined to be difficult, but even more so when Tibbs’s efforts …show more content…
The second amendment, unlike the fourth, is used correctly within the movie since guns are being used and people have the right to own them. Throughout the movie not only did the policemen have and use guns, but people in the town possessed guns as well. One scene in particular, that showed the community purchased their own guns, was towards the end of the movie when many people had followed Tibbs during the night. They all pulled up in their cars to where he had gone, ready to beat him and kill him if it went that far. Many people in that large group were carrying guns, and were upholding their second amendment to bear arms. Now in this instance the group of men hadn’t been harmed, threatened, or hurt by Tibbs, meaning their purpose of guns was unreasonable. There was no reason towards threatening to shoot Tibbs, other than the color of his skin and they did not like the fact that he was helping the police with the murder case. Once this scene was played out, there were shots fired, but not directed towards Tibbs. The men realized that he wasn’t the dangerous person in this situation, and was only there to aid in the investigation which will result with benefits in their …show more content…
Not everything followed what was constructed in our Amendments, since there was a search and seizure without a reasonable probable cause problem in the movie. The movie, In the Heat of the Night, did well at displaying the types of circumstances black people would run into during the times of the sixties. There were multiple scenes where Tibbs was cornered with his life and was about to get attacked, but there would be someone who would stand up for him and protect him not affected with his race. When there were people sticking up for black people, that brought about a feel good sense to the movie, along some hope. This hope came because the viewers knew not everyone was out to get black people, but instead wanted them to be treated equal. The movie was a favorable and interesting movie; there was a mystery behind it and that helped add to the suspense of the movie, but also point out the problems with African Americans during these
The movie Dope, written and directed by Rick Famuyiwa, follows the story of Malcolm through his senior year of high school in the Inglewood California. He lives in a poor neighborhood, with only his mom, yet he still strives for greatness. He has a couple of friends, and they all love 90’s hip hop culture. They try to do their best to stay out of trouble and away from bullies. Malcolm sees a girl he likes and ends up following her to a drug dealer’s birthday party. When the cops bust the birthday party, he unknowingly goes home with all the drugs and the gun that the drug dealer owns. This sets off a wild chain reaction, as he now has to sell these drugs to payoff the supplier, who happens to be the Harvard Alumni that Malcolm’s needs approval
The movie Shock Doctrine revolves around the concept of the same name. The film begins by discussing psychological research on the effects of shock therapy. It is evident that a person under extreme stress and anxiety commonly experienced during a crisis functions and performs inadequately. It is noted that the studies are conducted by a man by the name of Milton Friedman, from the University of Chicago; the studies took place in the past, and some of the subjects are still recovering in the aftermath. From this research, interrogation techniques were learned and the concept of the shock doctrine was formed. Essentially through causing a crisis, the population of a country can be shocked into complying with accepting laws that favors the United States and capitalism. This theory coexists with Friedman’s belief in that government regulation is bad, and through a crisis a country would better itself with deregulation. The video uses Chile as an example and shows how America allowed a crisis to occur in Chile, through coups, interrogations and subterfuge. In the end a new government is formed that allows capitalism. Unfortunately afterwards violence and riots occur, as the rich gain most of the wealth and poverty rises. In addition to Chile, Argentina, Russia and even Iraq underwent the shock doctrine. Almost in every account, poverty rises and violence ends up erupting. The movie ends by showing how the US was in the process of the shock doctrine, and still is but the population has taken notice. Protests such as Occupy Wall Street are some of the initiatives necessary to bring awareness to the problems of class inequalities in order to prevent capitalism from benefitting the rich and increasing the wealth gap among the classes.
The film, Out in the Night documents a 2006 case in which a group of young African American lesbians were accused of gang assault and attempted murder. The film portrays how unconscious bias, institutional discrimination and racism contributed to the convictions of seven African American lesbian women. Three of the women pleaded guilty to avoid going to trial, but four did not. Renata Hill, Patreese Johnson, Venice Brown, and Terrain Dandridge maintained their innocence and each were charged with several years in prison. I cried through out the documentary because it dawned on me that it’s not safe for women, especially gay women of color. The four-minute incident occurred in Greenwich Village where Dwayne Buckle sexually and physically harassed
United States is a country that has problems with gun control, and this issue has many debates between whether or not people should be allowed to carry a gun on them. This free county not only for speech and religion, but also allows people to have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment of the United States was written by our Founding Fathers,“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Government). The main purpose of the Second Amendment when our Founding Fathers wrote this amendment was to help the American citizens to defend themselves from the government at that time, and other countries from invading their properties. However, the Second Amendment could be the opposite of what our Founding Fathers wanted it to be in the twenty-first century, because many criminals are taking advantage of the right to carry guns, which in example results with the purpose of showing off with their friends, revenge for their gang’s members, or try to be like their favorite hero in the movie they had watched. On July 20, 2012, a massive shooting occurred inside of a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. The tragedy happened during a midnight screening of the film The Dark Knight Rises which killed twelve people and injuring seventy others. In response, this alarmed our government to rethink about the current gun control law in America. In A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell, the author informed to his audience the different views of gun ownership in early America, which part was the most important part of the debate, how did slavery affect the debate over militias in the South, the Continental army officer’s views, and the arguments be...
The second amendment states a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The founding fathers could have never anticipated the weapons we have today and that’s what some weapons are regulated and illegal to use. For an example the McDonald v. Chicago case brief, several suits were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment. There, the Court reasoned that the law in question was enacted under the authority of the federal government
In the Heat of the Night takes place during the civil rights movement. Chief Gillespie in conjunction with the racist residents of Sparta, do not welcome outsiders, especially not a black man, which is obvious upon Virgil Tibbs unjust arrest at the train station. Gillespie appears as a corrupt, prejudiced, and narrow-minded police chief, yet he and Virgil continue working collectively to solve Colbert’s murder. Chief Gillespie appears to experience self-isolation and loneliness which he expresses in the scene in his house with Virgil. For example, Gillespie asks Tibbs if he has a family or if he is or has been married. Chief Gillespie reacts to Tibbs’ responses as a consolation of pity, yet they similarly share a common bond of employment
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The second amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment II)." This means that citizens of the United States have the right to privately own and possess firearms. However, this has created controversy because some believe that there are many who abuse this right to commit criminal acts. Some believe that this amendment only applies to the eighteenth century lifestyle when the United States was under British control. A collective rights theory asserts that citizens do not have an individual right to possess guns and that local, state and federal legislative bodies therefore possess the authority to regulate firearms without implicating a constitutional right.
Spotlight dramatizes the documentary of how a leading news source, The Boston Globe, unveiled the outrageous wrongdoing of child molestation and hidden secrets under the local Catholic Church (Spotlight). It is a movie of power that makes the viewer experience the anger and pressure the reporters are feeling while trying to investigate what really happened in the Catholic Church (Spotlight). The investigation of one of the most profound institutions causes quite an uproar in the city of Boston. Directed by Tom McCarthy the 2015 drama film, Spotlight, will make you question the Catholic Church and the top lawyers in the state of Massachusetts (Spotlight). This film captures the positive and negative power of the press, the impact of The Boston
Currently people who are practicing their second amendment would always face problem with the police where the police will abuse it power and cause harm to the victim. As an example the article “Freddie Gray’s Second Amendment rights were violated — where is the NRA” by (Tony Ortega) explained that Freddie Gray was improperly arrested for having a legal weapon where the police though it was an illegal weapon. “But by the end of his ride to jail, he’d suffered a severed spine, resulting in his death seven days later.” (Ortega) This is why American’s are tired of police violating their second amendment because it could cause them their life. And the weapon he had was a blade that was legal in the state of Maryland and it tucked in a safe place in his pocket and this weapon is not even a gun it was an good weapon that is not really
The second amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, and it protects the right to keep and bear arms. With this law, people are permitted to own firearms for self defense or protection whenever they are physically or offensively attacked by other people. It does not corrupt protection power of citizens to save their selves and live a life free of harm. It does not carelessly provide the right of a person to possess firearms. This law enforces a requirement of firearm license, which can only be purchased after applicants undergo a background check that specifically checks the presence or a possible history of committed criminal cases. The Right to Bear Arms definitely excludes citizens who have a history of criminal acts against the community
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate. The United States government is attempting to reduce violent crime by controlling the amount of guns on the market, who is allowed to purchase a gun, and what type of gun a person is allowed to purchase. The only people affected by gun control laws are the law-abiding citizen that should be allowed to purchase firearms without the government’s interjection.
The Three Here’s for Cooking The romantic comedy, Today’s Special, expressed the worries of Indian parents becoming at ease. Also, expressed the struggles a parent faces in search of a better life, the passion and dedication going unnoticed in the work field, and the connection between friends, a lover, and family. However, the film centered its attention more on the development of Samir’s “cold” cooking within the Indian food, with the help of Akbar. In addition, the main actors in the film looked the part and associated with the main idea of the culture of an Indian family. For instance, Samir’s appearance showed he had drifted away from his family’s culture and developed a professional understanding and love for the cooking industry.
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence is a Steven Spielberg science fiction drama film, which conveys the story of a younger generation robot, David, who yearns for his human mother’s love. David’s character stimulates the mind-body question. What is the connection between our “minds” and our bodies?