The controversial issue of sweatshops is one often over looked by The United States. In the Social Issues Encyclopedia, entry # 167, Matt Zwolinski tackles the issues of sweatshops. In this article Matt raises a question I have not been able to get out of my head since I have begun researching this topic, “ are companies who contract with sweatshops doing anything wrong?” this article goes on to argue that the people who work in the sweatshops willingly choose to work there, despite the poor environment. Many people in third world countries depend on the sweatshops to earn what they can to have any hopes of surviving. If the sweatshops were to shut down many people would lose their jobs, and therefore have no source of income. This may lead people to steal and prostitution as well. this article is suggesting that sweatshops will better the economy by giving people a better job than what they may have had. Due to this the companies contracting with sweatshops are not acting wrong in any way. This was a deductive article it had a lot of good examples to show how sweatshops are beneficial to third world countries. Radly Balko seemed to have the same view point as Matt Zwolinski. Many people believe the richer countries should not support the sweatshops Balko believes if people stopped buying products made in sweatshops the companies will have to shut down and relocate, firing all of the present workers. Rasing the fact that again the worker will have no source of income, the workers need the sweatshop to survive. Balko also uses the argument that the workers willingly work in the current environments.
There are lots of sweatshops established in developing and less developed countries such as China and India. The main reason is the labor costs in those countries are much lower than developed countries. Due to the huge population in China and India, the wages will stay low in long term. Most of the workers are uneducated and unskilled, and they have to accept the low wages in order to pay for their daily necessities. The multinational companies like Apple Inc., IBM, H&M, Nike opened factories or outsourcing their products in China. These are unethical factories. A lot of people criticize the owners of these factories. However, all things are created by the demand. If sweatshops were useless, then they wouldn’t develop. Corporations want low
Sweatshops are factories where workers bear unhealthy and exploitive conditions, such as long hours, unventilated workspaces, low pay, or exposure to toxic resources. Sweatshops are not a perfect place of work for anyone; however possibilities are
The General Accountability Office defines a sweatshop as a “multiple labor law violator.” A sweatshop violates laws pertaining to benefits, working hours, and wages (“Toxic Uniforms”). To make more money, companies move their sweatshop factories to different locations and try to find the cheapest locations with the least regulations (“Sweatshops”). There are not as many sweatshop factories in the United States because the industries have been transferred overseas where the labor is cheaper and there are weaker regulations. In the United States, sweatshops are hidden from the public, with poor immigrant workers who are unable to speak out against the injustices (“Subsidizing Sweatshops”). Workers in sweatshops are forced to work overtime, earn below a living wage, do not earn benefits, and encounter verbal, physical and sexual abuse. Macy’s, JCPenney, Kohl’s, The
Sweatshops: A Bad Thing or an Economic Stepping-Stone?
Many people in our society today are constantly asking, "Why do sweatshops exist?" The answer to this question is that companies like Nike and Wal-Mart use sweatshops to produce their goods for a much cheaper rate, to reduce the cost of their products. The problem with sweatshops is that the workers are subject to hard work in often times poor conditions for minimal pay.
...e their product. Sweatshops are found usually all over the world and need to make a better decision as in more labor laws, fair wages, and safety standards to better the workers' conditions. It should benefit the mutually experiences by both the employers and the employees. Most important is the need to be educated about their rights and including local labor laws.
Sweatshops are considered to be a thing in the past, but the truth is they are more common than people would think. Many companies use sweatshops as a way to produce more products for little money. To some companies, their labels have become more of a priority than the workers who made it all possible.
No Sweat talks about the low wages in the sweat factories in all the developing countries. It gives an example of sweat factory’s workers in Uzbekistan. Where children work only for 48 cents wages per day (Garyfalakis, par. 2). Author shows that the wages that the sweat shop workers receive in the developing countries that are “not enough for basic survival needs” (Garyfalakis, par. 2). Sweat shop workers have to live with that small amount of wages which is hard to survive. Author shows the real story about sweatshop workers where she proves that, the wages that workers receive is not enough for basic survival.
What are sweatshops? The Miriam-Webster dictionary defines sweatshops as: A shop or factory in which employees work for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions. These factories are mainly located in Third-World countries, although there are still a few in the United States. Many popular, name brand companies like Nike, use sweatshops around the world. Today there is much controversy about sweatshops and whether they should be banned and closed. In reality, the conditions of these factories are terrible. The employees are paid very little, even after working long, hard hours. The supervisors of these shops are often cruel, malicious, and brutal. Sadly, these factories are often the only source of income for Third-World workers. As bad as these sweatshops might be, they have pulled many countries and individuals out of poverty. So, are sweatshops beneficial?
Over the past century, sweatshop has been a big discussion in our society. This project is a comprehensive research regarding sweatshops and how it had a substantial impact on stakeholders. Sweatshops are defined to be work factories in low-cost countries in which the employees work for long hours with low wages and dangerous working conditions (Dictionary). The Norwegian newspaper “Aftenposten” even referred it to as “deadly fashion”. Looking at this, workers suffer in order for businesses to obtain profits. Sweatshops have been argued to be a part of an evolution of underdeveloped countries but the discussion regarding sweatshop is still increasing at a rapid pace and it is a ethical question of morality. First, we will discuss the ethical