In Kassovitz's La Haine And Meirelles City Of God

1286 Words3 Pages

Both Kassovitz’s La Haine (1995) and Meirelles’ City of God (2003), utilise distinctive techniques in order to present ideas of power, poverty and conflict, as well as to reflect their urban environments in a particular way. Both directors present conflict between the poor and the powerful through a range of powerful micro and macro techniques to create films which expose the problems related to urban areas, and the context that each was set in, which contributes to getting the messages of their films across and thus has a greater impact on the audience. Both films represent the conflict between the poor and powerful through institutions overpowering the individual in the urban environment. This is clear in City of God, as the police are prejudiced …show more content…

This is fundamentally clear through the scene where Knockout Ned’s brother confronts Lil’zee and tries to stab him, which results in his death through the rhythmic sound of the gunshots firing at his body and in the house, which has the effect that the powerful in the urban environment appear to be indestructible because of their use of violence. This scene is effective as it progresses the narrative forward as now Knockout Ned is a part of the opposition against Lil’zee, despite him believing that violence is necessarily the answer. Yet, as the film progresses, his rage progresses and Meirelles perhaps emphasises that violence will always be a part of the urban environment as it is clear that in the favelas there was a 444% homicide rate in 1989 reinforcing this dog-eat-dog …show more content…

This is notably clear through the ending sequence in City of God, where the civil war is situated in the middle of the street through erratic camera movements, making the audience feel like they are involved in this war rather than spectators. Furthermore, this idea of conflict is key through the shot reverse shot of Rocket in the middle with Lil’zee on the left and the police on the right. The message this scene communicates is that although violence may be associated with the urban environment, it does not mean the youth there, in particular, choose this lifestyle of crime. Therefore, although Meirelles has no experience living in the favela, he reiterates justice through Rocket and the prop of the camera as a motif for escapism. As well as that, Shorty’s apartment scene is another example of this conflict, identifying a power struggle as the use of fading in and out has the effect of Meirelles exploring that there will always be a power struggle in the urban environment because of the lack of governmental

Open Document