In Defense of Canada's Rejection of the Death Penalty

explanatory Essay
1938 words
1938 words

A man, allegedly accused of first degree murder, has been put on a trial to see what his sentence will be. People are outraged and protesting for him to be put on death row. Family and friends of the victim are traumatized, seeking vengeance for the one that they have lost, hoping that Canada can bend the rules just once to get the justice they think they deserve. On the other hand, the prisoner sits in the court room waiting for the verdict that will ultimately change his life forever. He only has two options: if found guilty he will receive life imprisonment, if found innocent he will be let off scotch free. Or there’s always the third choice, the death penalty. How far does the battle have to go to stop him from killing? This could mean bringing back capital punishment to Canada. There’s the theory of an eye for an eye, or also the chance of a wrongful conviction. As with any debate there are pros and cons all weighing up to the final question, should Canada use the death penalty, or continue to use life imprisonment?

Although in the United States, most placed do not use the death penalty there are some that still do under certain circumstances. Canada is a Country that has not one province or territory that used the death penalty but Canada hasn’t always used life imprisonment. Between 1892 and 1961, the death penalty was used in Canada and the result was death by hanging. It wasn’t until 1914 that the death penalty was up for debate and the first bill to abolish it completely was made. In 1954, rape did not qualify as a death penalty punishment anymore. The Parliament dived murder into capital and non-capital categories in 1964. It took a long time, but the first time that the bill to abolish the death penalty was debat...

... middle of paper ...

...serli, Joe. . (2010, December 10). In a nutshell. Retrieved from

• Munroe,. (2010, October 31). Canada online . Retrieved from

• Phil B., . (2010). Phil for humanity . Retrieved from

• Robinson, Bruce.A. (2007, August 07). Religious tolerance. Retrieved from

• Skerrit,. (2009, February 03). Dominica news. Retrieved from

• Tackaberry,. (2000, April). Amnesty international. Retrieved from

• Tempest, Rone. (2008, June 30). Death penalty focis. Retrieved from

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that prison is a pro for the death penalty, as it separates the criminal from the public, rehabilitates prisoners, and makes them less likely to commit another crime.
  • Explains that there are many arguable cons in relation to the death penalty in canada.
  • Explains the pros and cons of the death penalty in canada.
  • Explains that the bible talks about the death penalty for a wide variety of crimes, such as adultery, homosexual behaviour, practicing evil sorcery, doing work, and murder.
  • Explains that california could save 1 billion dollars by replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment. the strongest point in the pros section is safety.
Get Access