Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
possible effects of change in an organisation
Impact of change in organisation
impact of change in organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: possible effects of change in an organisation
Introduction
Due to the changing nature of work, numerous companies have undergone a transition from an evaluative to a developmental approach in regards to their performance management strategy. Mirroring this approach, Luxcars had similarly implemented ongoing feedback within their performance management system to improve employee engagement and operational efficiency. However, Luxcars are currently facing a disparity occurring between intended and actual outcomes; consequently this has resulted in significant employee dissatisfaction, a drop in productivity and increase in costs. This report will detail the issues encountered by Lux Cars in relation to their upgraded performance management system. This report will additionally discuss solutions
…show more content…
Historically, Luxcars had primarily relied on annual performance appraisals, thereby had not developed a culture supportive of ongoing feedback. Luxcars had not accounted for the time required for all staff to adapt to a complete renewal of the organisation’s performance management system; this is evident through the collective unwillingness to commit to frequent performance feedback sessions. Luxcars’ sudden shift to performance feedback sessions may have been implemented too swiftly, additionally lacking adequate planning and regard to corporate strategy. Collecting insights generally from employees, managers and colleagues appeared to have been an excessively broad approach and lacked direction in terms of information being collected. Hence, Luxcars was more susceptible to mass collections of general, unnecessary and irrelevant information which failed to serve a purpose in furthering employee and organisational outcomes; such an approach did not enable for attention to be drawn to specific areas of concern. Thus, this in turn had resulted in unnecessary costs as well as unexpected increased stress and workload for staff. It should also be noted that Luxcars differs significantly from other firms adopting the strategy of ongoing, informal feedback (e.g. …show more content…
This strategy will be advantageous in ensuring Luxcars are to target areas of concerns, preventing unnecessary wastage of resources. Furthermore, this will foster a steady development of feedback seeking behaviours in employees to become accustomed to the practice without a significant increase in workload. Allowing feedback to be provided on an as needed basis will additionally allow for employees to raise concerns as necessary, thus removing the obligation and lessening the pressure to constantly discuss their performance. As opposed to being given in the form of large batches in a non-continuous fashion, the provision of feedback is seen to be more effective when given as soon as required in small quantities and enacted on in a timely manner (Hillman, Schwandt & Bartz 1990). Resultantly, this will ensure a minimisation of costs and negligible impact upon employee productivity. This proposed solution is able to be practically implemented as supported through the creation of an online feedback tool (Becom & Insler 2013). As a further benefit, an online feedback tool would facilitate ease of communication, allowing for the effective provision and reception of feedback. Additionally, providing timely feedback will thereby allowing plentiful time for discussions to be held between employees and managers in order to initiate
Feedback is an excellent tool to provide employees with information and guidance. Feedback consists of two-way communication. Employee feedback provides managers with clues regarding how they are hindering or aiding their subordinates ' work performance. Supervisory feedback should inform, enlighten, and suggest improvements to employees regarding their performance. Feedback increases self-awareness. Proverbs 19:20 states “Hear counsel, receive instruction, and accept correction, that you may be wise in the time to come.” If presented correctly, feedback is not positive or negative. It is just data to make someone aware of the impact of his/her skills and behaviors on
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
First type is positive feedback. This type of feedback we all love but too much positive feedback can cause us to become complacent with our work. Receiving this type of feedback is definitely encouraging to a worker and it stands out the most due to the fact of how well it made us feel. The next type is negative feedback, which to us means failure. We do not like how receiving negative feedback feels so we usually do not accept unfavorable information. There is also a tendency for the recipient to try to place blame on another individual, constant explanations as well as only fixing the behavior to avoid it in the future. Doing so may change the individual’s actions but if they have no guidance with it he or she may still not perform at a desired behavior. The last type of feedback is no feedback at all. The article states, that no response feedback at all is detrimental to the employee’s performance in the workplace (Sadri and Seto, 2011). There has to be some type of encouragement or motivation for them. The authors have a good rule to follow with feedback, “Since the purpose of feedback is to motivate and inform, we suggest that the ratio of positive to negative information that an individual receives is very important. Three positives followed by one negative is a good ratio” (Sadri and Seto, 2011, p.
Performance management aims to manage and improve individual performance with a vision to improving performance across the entire business. [Walter. M, 1995] defines performance management as the process of ‘Directing and supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible in line with the needs of the organisation’. It is very important to direct and support employees to work efficiently, and this can only be successful if a well-structured performance management system is put in place. But, nonetheless some organisations don’t get it
The 360-degree feedback system can be very delicate in nature. A person not well ready for it could be thrown out of balance. It can also generate some new problem in an organisation. It not designed and conducted well, it posses the potential danger of a candidate developing wrong perceptions or notions about one or more of his auditor and creating new perspective towards them. It is therefore, unavoidable and significant to handle the process well and make it foolproof. The first important step is to examine whether the organisation is ready for it or not. The second important step is to examine if the candidate is ready for it. For the purpose of systematic analysis and examination of the problem at hand, the studies by the several researchers have been reviewed. Baron, (2009) examines that managers who received upward feedback about their supervisory behaviour significantly improved their behaviour and improves the subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Similarly, Baron, (2009) found that employees were favourably disposed toward associate rating. The feedback is positively related with fulfilment with prior peer ratings and negatively associated with perceived friendship bias and years of company experience. Subordinates’ ratings of leadership were significantly higher following feedback from subordinates under which a highly structured session is there where leaders discussed the feedback results with subordinates (Baron, 2009).
“Using PM System doesn’t improve the performance of an organization. PM system incorporates of not only evaluating performance appraisals but also rewards. As quoted by Sheridan (2009) and Latham (2005), “the cultural maturation of performance based can take decades to implement and requires the organizations to allocate the required resources”. Technology plays a pivotal role in future of PM systems where e-monitoring of performance of employees in Hilton and other entities respectively can change the evolution of performance management thus bringing necessary and important changes to stay competitive in the market as well increasing an individual’s productivity in the company (Sheridan & Latham, 2005)”.
...t. This method would allow upper management to see the feedback as well as the success of the program and the improvements that can be made for the next training program. (Noe, 2013)
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
Performance management is a management tool used to value, monitor and measure a company’s strategies that ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of its product delivery. This management tool does not focus on the organisation and on its employees as well as stakeholders. It is a continuous process that entails that managers make sure that organisational and employee values are corresponding (Aguinis, 2005,p.1/2-1/5). Performance Management brings about the competencies in the employees, increases self-esteem by giving feedback to employees, there is a low number of lawsuits because it helps understand the company better (eThekwini Municipality, 2008,p.10-11). According to Pride, Hughes and Kapoor (2011, p.288) performance management creates motivation for employees; one theory of motivation is of Expectancy, which stipulates that employees satisfaction is driven by expectations of what an organisation will offer in return.
Performance management is a great tool for both the employee as well as the organization. For the employee, it gives the employee a clear picture of his areas of improvement and helps him improve and grow. From the organization’s perspective, it lets them understand the potential they have in their employees and how to realize them. It helps them to analyze who are worthy of being held onto and whom to let go so that the organization grows. In all, an effective tool, if used in the correct manner by all the parties involved.
The 360-degree feedback or multi sources feedback is assessment, which comes from other employees. This feedback contains direct and indirect information from managers, colleagues, subordinates as well as self-evaluation data. Also, it includes other external sources such as customers and suppliers reports. The 360-degree feedback plays a significant role to help workers develop their performance. Human resources professionals are increasingly using this assessment. The main propose of the 360 feedback is to encourage employees to seek out information about their performance, skills and working relations. The origin of 360-feedback came from the German military during World War II. They started using multiple sources in order to evaluate officer’s performance (Thornton, 2014). In this paper, I am going to explore some key principles and actions that can help a manager increase their 360-degree feedback ratings. The paper will identify manager perspective of job performance, environmental factors influencing employee review of managers, and perspective of customers and suppliers satisfaction. Also, actions will be suggested for affective applications of the principles.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
Performance management is a process that guarantees an organisation and all of its available resources are working collectively and effectively towards achieving the organisation’s mission or goal. Performance management affords an understanding of what drives an individuals, and even organisations, performance at all levels. An understanding of performance management allows for the identification and minimisation of unproductive areas of an organisation, as well as an ability to predict future performance. It is a powerful tool that can be used by managers at all levels of an organisation to help improve a company’s productivity.
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Performance management is a continuous process that creates a working culture to encourage employees to improve their work performance and reach their full potential during their stay of employment. Performance Management also provides strategic direction, develop competency in employees and instill organization value. This paper will identify methods and affects that performance management plan has on the organization and their employees.