Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
benefits and problems of participative budgeting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: benefits and problems of participative budgeting
Budget participation is another factor that is important in evaluating and determining the firm’s performance. Sharing of information among organizational members is crucial in the budgeting process. Research has found that if the opinions of the employees are collected and reviewed in the budgeting process, then the firm will have a higher possibility of achieving the goals and targets compared to budgets which are set up by the directors. However, this is only considered effective if the employees value their membership in the committee and think of the targets of budgeting as a common desired goal. Hence, participation by individual members can improve group interaction.
Budgetary participation is expected to be a very important channel
…show more content…
It is regarded as a negotiation channel linking communication between superiors and subordinates in an organization. This includes downward communication from superiors to subordinates and upward communication from subordinates to superiors. Downward communication lets subordinates obtain extra information such as their responsibilities and expected performance from superiors through budgeting process, which improves the subordinates’ effectiveness. Upward communication means that subordinates communicate their information to their respective superiors, resulting in better decision-making and budget.
Moreover, budget participation of employees can help to improve the realisation of budget goals. Thus, a firm management team should encourage employee participation in the budgeting process, a process which will involve setting goals and targets that are achievable.
Budget
…show more content…
It is one of the major factors that will determine how the budgetary process is affecting the firm performance. Budget control happens when there is a difference between the actual amount incurred and the budget that was set up previously. This is known as a budget variance. There are two types of budget variance, which are favourable variances and unfavourable variances. For example, if actual revenue exceeds budgeted revenue, then it is a favourable variance. On the other hand if actual revenue is lower than budgeted revenue, then it is an unfavourable variance. Favourable budget variance is caused by effective and efficient cost management which results in greater net income. However, ineffective and inefficient cost management will results in unfavourable budget variances and thus lower the net income. The variance in budget is mainly caused by four factors. Firstly, budget variance can be resulted from inaccurate data. Besides, the changes in the costs of raw materials and production quantity can also cause budget variance. Moreover, random or unusual happenings can also give rise to variation. Over-efficient or under-efficient operations may also results in budget
One must understand that the integral core of a company rests in its accounting and financial areas. The departments’ need employees with an advanced knowledge and skill set to ensure the payment of supplies and accounting on the expenditure is correctly recorded. If the accounting desk presents inaccurate spending calculations on behalf of the company, it could result in spending more than what has actually been earned; this could lead to the company not only being unable to increase in revenue, but also experience loss. It is imperative that the management of the financial department is well informed and able to make decisions by taking into account the usage of every coin stated in the expenditures, and also to know the amount of revenue the company is making so that we can plan on better strategies to improve the revenues (Lu, Madu, Kuei & Winokur, 1994).
The Chief Financial Officer of each local municipality is in charge of creating the overall budget and User-Friendly Budget document. In conducting this survey, it will vary from the first survey in that it will incorporate more quantitative type questions. The object behind this survey is to see if I can obtain information on the number of citizens attend budget hearings for both the introduced and adopted budgets before and after the requirement of the User-Friendly Budget document. I am also attempting to gather information on whether or not CFO’s are actively attempting to increase citizen participation by effectively advertising the User-Friendly Budget. How many people have they explained what the User-Friendly Budget document is and how it works. Additionally I am attempting to see if CFO have a positive or negative reaction the new requirement to create a User-Friendly Budget document. This may be a key driving force on whether or not citizen participation increases as a result of the User-Friendly Budget. If local municipalities do not effectively advertise their budget than the expectations are that there will be little to no increase in citizen
Fallon & McConnell explain that having employees participate in some organizational decisions because this helps to avoid potential problems (n.d.). Providing employees with opportunities for open discussion can help HR managers identify the areas that employees may need additional training and development. Furthermore, employees can give their input on daily operations of the organization that executives, managers, and supervisors may not be
Portfolio Theory is a way of budgeting that entails organizing budget activities into portfolios and comparing portfolios with each other in order to maximize utility. By creating portfolios, budget activities are not simply evaluated on their own merits, but also by how they interact with each other. A weighted average of expected returns provides the overall return of the portfolio, while examining the covariance of the activities in the portfolio shows the overall variance or risk that the portfolio has. By understanding the constraints and following particular rules, you can arrive at the best possible portfolio which will determine the best possible budget (Khan, 2002).
Top-down budgeting is the preferred method of budgeting for government agencies and many organizations (Ljungham). The methodology of top-down budgeting is described as “dominated by top members of the executive branch and the legislative branch” (Williams & Calabrese, 2011, 178). The methodology entrusts top members to make annual budgeting decisions for their organizations. In many instances, top members also use this time to set annual program or department goals and targets. Top members make these decisions without solicitation of input from bottom levels of an organization. This can result in operational and logistical constraints in the lower levels of an organization when plans are implemented (Williams & Calabrese, 2011). Additionally, it can serve as a source of frustration for staff when uninformed budgeting decisions create consequences. This is particularly true when staff is tasked with making things work in the aftermath of budgeting decisions, despite having clear or attainable goals and budgets. Like all budgeting methodologies, there are benefits and difficulties.
(Covey) In my organization we are fast paced and deadline driven, each of us has to train and depend on our employees decision making process. I know which of my employees can handle which tasks and set goals for each according to their abilities. I usually get them together in a group to discuss what our immediate objectives are. I encourage input from every level, including our part time employees, so everyone feels included and when we achieve goals, everyone wins. We monitor our progress, and meet frequently if a problem arises, and are very quick to praise each other when we have moved closer to our goals. I feel including everyone in this process gives everyone a sense of ownership in the organization. My employees want to contribute, they take great pride in helping in the decision making process, their sense of meaning and worth are just as great a reward as any paycheck could be.
According to Hopwood, (1976, as cited in Parker and Kyj, 2006) sharing of information between superiors and subordinates are one of the main benefits of the budgeting process. Shields and Shields (1998, as cited in Parker and Kyj, 2006) argue that information sharing during the budgeting process between the superior and subordinate is of high importance because both the individual and the organization can potentially benefit from it. Survey results show (Parker and Kyj, 2006) that vertical information sharing plays a huge role in understanding the performance effects of organizational commitment and budget participation. Role ambiguity is the intervening variable between the relation organizational commitment and budget participation (Parker and Kyj, 2006). Vertical information sharing consists of upward information sharing and downward information sharing.
Participative Budgeting is the situation in which budgets are designed and set after input from subordinate managers, instead of merely being imposed. The idea behind this sort of budgeting is to assign responsibility to subordinate managers and place a form of personal ownership on the final budget. Nearly two decades of management accounting research has resulted in equivocal findings on the consequences and effects of participative budgeting (Lindquist 1995). Participative budgeting certainly has various advantages, these include the transferral of information from subordinate to superior increased job satisfaction for the subordinate, budgetary responsibility and goal congruence. Its disadvantages include budgetary slack and negative motivation, however it is the conditions in which participative budgeting takes place determines whether the budgeting process is successful. The conditions are dependent on various factors such as the level of participation, level of subordinate influence, the extent to which budgetary slack takes place, volatility, job related information, and the complexity of the budget.
The Budget is а financial plan listed in а statement that shows the expected expenses and income during а specific period of time known as Budget Period (Cambridge, 2016). This Budget period usually specified by the organization and referred as а fiscal year. The Budget Period can be both long or short term, and this depends on the organization’s type. Budgets are required for reasons; to show the financial implications of plans; to determine the resources needed to achieve the plans; to provide a means to measure, monitor and control the results against the plans.
Line Item budgeting is the most widely used approach in many organizations due to its simplicity and its control orientation. “It is referred to as the "historical" approach because administrators and chief executives often base their expenditure requests on historical expenditure and revenue data. One important aspect of line-item budgeting is that it offers flexibility in the amount of control established over the use of resources, depending on the level of expenditure detail (e.g., fund, function, object) incorporated into the document” (National Center for Education Statistics). The advantages of line item budgeting are that it offers simplicity; “you can easily budget for each area or department of your company based on historical expenditures required in previous years. If the amount of these expenditures has been consistent over a period of years, line-item budgeting can offer a simple and reliable means of anticipating expenses for the coming year while saving time and effort in the budget preparations” (Joseph). “Another advantage of a line-item budget is that it can be easy to justify the expenditures. Proposed expenditures are based on historical needs, which makes very little to dispute among departments within the organizations. This allows companies and business owners to maintain tight budgetary control, while reducing the possibility of frivolous spending” (Joseph). There are a few dis advantages of line item budgeting; it can create a phony analysis of expenditures. Budget preparers may simply accept the current situation and continue to use the same budgeting method that worked well in previous fiscal years. “By accepting the current situation it could eliminate the opportunity to take an in-depth look at each ...
In addition, if a company uses participative budgeting to create its budgets on a rolling basis, the total employee time used over the course of a year is substantial. Consequently, it is best to adopt a leaner approach to a rolling budget, with fewer people involved in the process.
A company's budget serves as a guideline in planning and committing costs in order to meet tactical and strategic goals. Tactical goals such as providing budgetary costs for daily operations, and strategic objectives that include R&D, production, marketing, and distribution are all part of the budgeting process. Serving as a guideline rather than being set in stone, the budget is a snapshot of manager's "best thinking at the time it is prepared." (Marshall, 2003, p.496) The budget is a method in which to reign-in discretionary spending, and will likely show variances between what costs have been anticipated and what costs are actually incurred.
Budgeting is a process in which every firm has to be involved with not only the board of director (Principle) who authorize the budget but also management team (Agent) who use it as well. In other words, budgeting need communication with every level of employee in the company in order to construct the goal or strategy of the company. Moreover, budgets are an instrument of power as well as being a reflection of power (Ashton et. al., 1995, p.289). Budgets that are not based on well-understood activities and costs are poor indicators of performance (Drury, 2005). Nowadays, at the time of information and technology the conventional budgeting is not good enough for withstand the rivalry in the global market. As Hope and Fraser, 2000 cited from Young, 2006 say the traditional performance management model cannot reflect today’s discontinuous change economy, which is why they point that annual budget model may be seen as having a number of intrinsic weaknesses and acting as a barrier to the effective implementation of alternative models for utilize in the success of strategic change. Therefore, I separate my essay into two parts. First, indicate and criticize on five inbred weaknesses of annual budget model. Second, explain ways in which the conventional budgeting process may be seen as an obstacle to accomplishment of the aims of Benchmarking, Balanced scorecard, and Activity-based models for the fulfillment of strategic change.
I learned a few things about my school and myself in regards to this area of leadership by participating in this activity. I learned that my school asks for very little participation from the teachers and community in regards to the budgeting process. But it could be an excellent venue to review prior year accomplishments as well as decide on future objectives with these stakeholders. If I were an administrator, involving the community and faculty would not only help in maintaining awareness, but I could also use this as a way to help those who may not be directly vested in my school, but who are helping fund it through their taxes, recognize effective administration in our efforts to reduce costs and provide needed resources to the various programs. I also feel that budget decisions cannot be solely programmatic or solely monetary. There needs
This is because budgeting process fosters coordination, cooperation and communication among the various business units (Raghunandan M, Ramgulam N & Mohammed K, 2012). It promotes dialogue and understanding by linking various departments together thus ensuring that attainment of overall objectives. Budgets can also act as an instrument to remind everyone of the agreed targets and to measure progress to date. If the employees monitor the small amounts of customer 's account, they have the authority to write off and they will be more aware of the impact budgeting process has on the department. Therefore, by asking the whole team for ideas to increase company’s efficiency, it will come out with a better budgeting decision of getting a lower cost that will lead to higher motivation to improve employees’ work