Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Innovative microcredit solutions to fight poverty
How has microfinance impacted economic development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Innovative microcredit solutions to fight poverty
A majority of the Indian population lacks opportunities such as financial resources and thereby the ability to get jobs. They are stuck in an endless cycle which provides them with no opportunities to lift themselves out of poverty. Microcredit has been seen as a lifeline and as an opportunity by governments in developing countries, international funding organizations and donor agencies, in order to help the poor attain money since the 1950’s. It was in the 1950s and1960s, for the first time Indian Government started giving out loans to families in rural areas those who worked in the agricultural sector as well as city-dwelling families who were working in the unskilled sector to promote economic growth throughout India. Households in the agricultural sector were divided into three different groups according to the type of work done by them. The ones doing similar work were put in the same group and the loan amount they would get depended on the type of work they did.
The first group was that of the small and medium agricultural farmers. It also comprised of the artisans and people who rear poultry and other landless livestock. The second group was that of the micro-enterprise workers. They were either the agricultural or the poultry/dairy farmers who used to sell their crops and produce. The non-farm sector workers who worked in repair shops, wooden furniture making shops and other microenterprises were also included in this group. The third group was that of small agricultural, poultry, dairy-based enterprises; and non-farming individuals. The groups usually employed 6-10 workers, working in an enterprise. By 1969, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi started nationalizing the commercial banks. The nationalization of commercial bank...
... middle of paper ...
...lmost none of the poorest households had any sort of insurance cover.
Since the poor people do not have steady jobs, their incomes are irregular and unpredictable, and banks have no collateral against which the loans can be given out; thus the banks do not want poor clients from both rural and urban areas. Furthermore, the “geographical distance, the widespread illiteracy, and the diverse backgrounds of borrowers” (in this case the rural poor) and the frequency of high cost transactions make it difficult and non-desirable for the banks to give out the loans to rural poor communities. Banks also believe in the fact that the government’s rules and regulations make it difficult to distribute loans to the poor. India’s rural poor have their own financial needs that are influenced by their location, living situation, and their availability to resources and opportunities.
This bank held government money and controlled the economy by making it easier for local banks to borrow money from it to loan it to manufacturers and factories. As the idea arose the cabinet, Jefferson protested that such a bank was unconstitutional because it favored the north over the south since the bank did not loan money to farmers for land expansions. Being true as it is, the bank drastically boosted our economy and had a great future for our nation. Since it was unconstitutional, a compromise said that the bank would only be funded for 20 years. So as soon as Andrew Jackson was elected, he destroyed the bank. In response to this, our nation suddenly falls into a major depression. No one had jobs and the economy was dying. This showed the brilliance of the national bank and how much it helped our economy. Adding onto this, the bank began the formation of the Federalist and Democratic
Microcredit, as described by Isserles, is a development “scam” which destroys the lives of Third World peoples. To her, these small loans falsely identify women, and others, as being worthy of credit, but the agreement’s terms subjugate them to continued financial dependency on microcredit loans. The First world hails this program as a success because aid is just a handout while microloans are a way of creating self-reliance through the market. Isserles states that the market becomes the solution to the “temporary” state of poverty, and this idea is due to a disconnect between the First World and the Third World. Projects claim to support women through finance, yet they refuse to alter the labor and domestic conditions of women across the world.
The problems that Microcredit programs attempt to solve are the problems of moral hazard, asymmetric information, and adverse selection.
The government of India has suggested an approach called the MGNREGA for poverty reduction. This program was launched in September 2005 by the central government of India. The major focus of the scheme is that it provides 100 days of paid employment to every household from rural areas. The goal of the act is to increase earnings of the villagers. Adult members of households do a wide range of laborious work which does not require any specific skills. What is more, the program has covered sufficient amounts of slow-developing rural areas of India: 200 – in the first st...
This is necessary as the vast majority of individuals migrating from rural to urban centers has been steadily increasing with the level of economic growth seen within the past twenty years as mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, this situation has further shown the structural issues and inequalities of cities, as most migrants end up having a poor quality of life living in informal settlements as highlight substantially by Boo. As a means of tackling this, however, the Indian government has turned its focus on investing rural regions, developing the agricultural sector. Specifically, Boo mentions that “the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, had come down from Delhi to express his concern for the farmers’ hardships, and the central government’s determination to relieve it” (p. 138). While this is definitely important funds are not being divided justly. For starters, between rural and urban areas almost all investments are being targeting towards rural regions, which is only addressing issues of inequality in one section of the country. Furthermore, across rural areas inequalities of investment are quite often overlooked. Although, “one of the governments hopes was to stop villagers from abandoning their farms and further inundating cities like Mumbai, but Asha’s relatives knew nothing of these celebrated relief programs” (p. 138). Therefore, even though
At that time National Savings and Investment Bank was the only bank which was incorporated by a Parliament Act. There was no regulatory framework which led private sector savings banks to carry out its activities. The main problem that PSDB had to face was that the bank did not have “parate execution” rights which allows to sell mortgage property when loans are defaulted by customers. This “parate execution” gives the rights to recover the loan which defaulted by the customers by passing a board meeting resolution and placing paper advertisement informing about the decision. Since Pauma bank did not have that right, it had to consult civil law to recover loans but it was not practical for the bank.
Hence, the government opened up the market to private investors which reduced the involvement of the government on every aspect and element of the economy. This is basically because of the market speculation for expansion as the local market was now not confined to boundaries of the country due to international trade. This is particularly seen through the statistics as the GDP and GNP values which was rather constant prior to 1978, clearly indicating a growth from there
Askari Bank’s Organizational Design is bureaucratic because it is principally owned by the army and its working methods are directed by the board members of the bank.
You have a choice of paying by cash, debit card, online account or credit card. If you do not have money in your bank or online accounts, then either you go without, or you use your credit card. But, what about the people who have money in their bank account and still use their credit card.
... The Bank of England was nationalized in 1946, followed in 1947 by the coal mines, an industry that was unprofitable in recent years that even the owners are pleased to receive payment in compensation. The railways had recently relied heavily on public subsidy, and the gas and electricity companies had in many cases developed as municipal undertakings. They seem of proper national concern. The iron and steel industry proved more controversial, being denationalized and renationalized in subsequent years.
Opening a saving bank account is very easy. These days, there is no such thing as minimum balance as the Reserve Bank of India has advised all banks to open saving accounts with “NIL” balance. This is called a Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account. One just needs to fill up the account opening form with a latest photograph and submitting documents to comply the “know your customer” (KYC) norms, i.e., proof of our identity and residence. The account can also be opened on the basis of the Aadhar Card. Some of the other features are that banks will not charge fees for deposit of money any number of times. Banks will also not charge for four withdrawals during a month. The account holder also gets a passbook and an ATM/smart card without any fee.
Overall, microcredit has helped millions of people around the world and it continues to have a great impact on poor people, informing them that all they need is a little ‘push’ or start-up money to begin creating a better life and subsequently a better community. Each organization has its own goals and purposes depending on the country where they reside as well as different challenges that have appeared. Microcredit is helping poor people and small business owners to better themselves as well as to their families and have their time, skills, and ideas utilized in an effective and positive way.
Some of the arguments in the article say that the reason why people are in debt is because expenses are higher now than they were in the 1970 's. Another argument is that we are living in a materialistic place, especially in California and New York. Everybody wants to look good and have the best, so they use their credit card to make these expenses. Some arguments blame teens for using credit cards. Teens already use credit cards and spend money. Banks and financial institutions are also blamed for the rise in credit card debt because they lower monthly payments on credit cards. Others just think that Americans are comfortable with having credit card debts.
The first and arguably most common effect of poverty on society is its financial impact (Veritta, 2008). In many of the societies that experienced significantly high levels of poverty, debt was increasingly common, and especially debt accrued from moneylenders (Hatcher, 2016). For many individuals living in poverty, access to financial services such as banking is often stifled and rudimentary, making it difficult for such individuals to access self-improvement loans at standard and fair rates (Yoshikawa, Aber, & Beardslee, 2012). For these individuals, moneylenders are the best option available, which results in them paying exorbitant interest rates. The interconnection between poverty and finance, however, is cyclic in nature. The lack of finances or access to financial services causes poverty, which in turn causes an isolation of individuals from finances and financial services (Hickey & du Toit, 2013). This makes poverty a fairly complex problem to
An important term that is cropping up everywhere nowadays is “Microfinance”. It is important for every person interested in the field of finance to be aware of this term, as in the coming days Microfinance is expected to be one of the brightest and the most appealing sector of the Indian Economy.