Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonization of the Philippines by the us
Colonization of the Philippines by the us
Colonization of the Philippines by the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Colonization of the Philippines by the us
“The love for One’s country is a splendid thing, but why should love stop at the border?” (Pablo Casals). These strong and empathetic words are a testament to the mentality of The United States of America. Where some have come to believe that imperial acts are unruly and unjustified, the proposition that America merely took action in the Philippines, as an act of peace and protection for their sake, seems to be constantly surpassed. In fact, it could be understood that without American influence, the Philippines would be in worse shape now. However, the U.S. took the liberty to assist and allie in need.With the best interest of all people in mind the continuous generosity and the caring mentality of the United States; American imperialism
In addition to this idea the Philippines has an abundance of rich land that would thoroughly increase the way of life in both America and for the Filipino people. However, it has been concluded that the citizens of this fresh country do not utilize the resources provided, and only use the bare minimal, while wasting the rest of the land. But if this corner of the world was “Touched by the wands of American enterprise, fertilized with American capital, these islands would speedily become richer than Golconda was of old.”, then both countries would reap the benefits. With their abundance and our trade and business opportunity, jobs, money, and well being, could be created for both nations. Also, the U.S.A. has provided support and security to countries for decades and without our back up the Philippines would continue to be ruled by European countries. As former President, William McKinley, once said, “ “that we could not give them back to Spain that would be cowardly and dishonorable; (2) that we could not turn them over to France or Germany our commercial rivals in the Orient that would be bad business and
This is true because in this time period The Philippines was in a time of immense struggle and despair. After their war for freedom against Spain, they were in an extremely vulnerable situation both regarding the stability of their government, as well as their national security. William Jennings Bryan announces that “Some argue that American rule in the Philippine Islands will result in the better education of the Filipinos,”. Although controversial, there is some supporting information that backs up this statement. That would include the fact that during the insurrection of the Philippines president taft provided them with schools, in order to better educate the future of their country. He also attempted to even further gain their support by putting in roads and bridges. The ideas that the U.S. began this conquest with was that in return for better educating their country and providing them with the resources to have a functioning society, they would be allowed access to the markets nearby. Such ideas are shown when Senator Albert J. Beveridge explains that, “Just beyond the Philippines are China 's illimitable markets. We will not retreat from either. We will not repudiate our duty in the archipelago.” Providing insight on the responsibility America feels for the outcome of this country, and how important both of them are
The first reason the United States should have annexed the Philippines is because it is our duty to as a country to spread the values of democracy overseas. For example, as stated here in Albert J. Beveridge’s campaign speech he says, “ Do we owe no duty to the world?… it is ours to save for liberty and civilization (Doc B).” He is saying that it is our duty as a sovereign nation to help an uncivilized nation modernize, industrialize, . another example, is from William Mcki...
After the long lasting process of imperializing the Philippines, the overall impact was significant in all areas such as economically, socially, and politically. Yet, not only did this impact the Philippines, but also for the Americans in a small way. Economically, American imperialism helped the Philippines become an independent export, and the Americans influenced a more advanced economy for the Philippines, while also opening connections to resources for themselves. This was a result of the economic expansion after the 1909, in which the U.S. became one of the Philippines most dominate trading partners and encouraged free trade. Other advancements included higher employment rates, and stronger transportation systems. The overall economic
Imperialism was the belief that a country must extend its power and influence over other land. This belief was what fueled most of the late 19th and early 20th century’s governments. To the mother countries at the time, it was the best thing that ever happened to them because they became exceptionally wealthy from the colony’s profits. The colonies had horrible working conditions, no food, loss of homes, and the combination of all three of these points led to death. The reason imperialism had a negative impact on the world was because the poor, working class of the colonies heavily outweighed the wealthy people of the upper class in the mother countries. This meant that imperialism caused more harm than good since it affected more people in a detrimental way. Although Imperialism improved economic conditions throughout the world, as a whole, it led to negative consequences for the indigenous people. Imperialism was responsible for minor wars. The result of imperialism was colonization which destroyed homes, farms, and wages. Imperialism eventually led to nationalism. Overall, Imperialism harmed the indigenous people.
The March of the Flag is a statement given by Albert Beveridge about the power of the US. He uses the power of the US to give the idea that US has its own ideas, and those ideas could be spread globally because US is so powerful. He is really arrogant, and he believes that due to America’s power they can spread ideas to other countries quickly and easily. He uses GOD as merely a symbol of power, a way to show how powerful the country is, and how influential it can become. We discussed the culture spread of the US in class, how it affected other culture, and created culture shocks. The article The Paralyzing Influence of Imperialism, William Jennings Bryan, discusses the US influence, and the influence that can be brought upon the Philippine Islands. He discusses the way, traders, taskmasters, officeholders, and military can control the small group of the Philippine Islands and influence them culturally and
Miller, Stuart C. “Letter from New York-Born Soldier.” Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899-1903. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1982. 88. Print.
Section I,2. Analyze the consequences of American rule in Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Philippines. Did the citizens prosper? Enjoy freedom? Accept American rule? Comment on the consequences for the United States with regard to the statement made by Eric Foner in the text, “Thus, two principles central to American freedom since the War of Independence – no taxation without representation and government based on the consent of the governed – were abandoned when it came to the nation’s new possessions.
they cannot deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” The Filipinos weren't treated as equals, but rather were governed over, which ultimately deprived the life styles of many. Also, the Filipinos were far from the pursuit of happiness, thousands of natives died trying to win independence, causing resentment and anger, the opposite of life, liberty, and safety. Understandably, the United States, a very successful nation in many ways, thought that their “charity case” to the Philippines was beneficial. Allowing the uncivilized to be part of a powerful, profitable, civilized culture seemed like the proper outreach to a country that had just been ruled over for 300 years.
It is the intention of this essay to explain the United States foreign policy behind specific doctrines. In order to realize current objectives, this paper will proceed as follows: Part 1 will define the Monroe Doctrine, Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5 will concurrently explicate the Roosevelt Corollary, Good Neighbor Policy, and the Nixon Doctrine, discuss how each policy resulted in U.S. involvement in Latin American countries, describe how it was justified by the U.S. government, respectively, and finally, will bring this paper to a summation and conclusion.
The truth is I didn’t want the Philippines, and when they came to us, as a gift from the gods, I did not know what to do with them.… I sought counsel from all sides— Democrats as well as Republicans—but got little help. I thought first we would take only Manila; then Luzon; then other islands perhaps also. I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight; and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night late it came to me this way… that we could not give them back to Spain… that we could not leave them to themselves— they were unfit for self-government… [and] that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God’s grace do the very best we could by them.” (Thomas G. Paterson and Dennis
As America becomes becomes industrialized, trade expands exponentially, and America gains power, but also becomes vulnerable. America’s increased power and influence is evidenced by its presence in Cuba and the Philippines. In his Inaugural Address, President Aguinaldo compares Philippines’ struggle for independence to America’s, implying that he respected American society, and wanted to emulate it. While this proves that America was highly influential at the time, the fact that it conquered Philippines shortly after this address for economic benefits makes one wonder if this influence is destroying American morality. Industrialization also led to overproduction, causing a fall in crop prices. Hahn argues that this led to rebellions, largely
During the Spanish-American war Filipinos were very active in fighting the Spanish. Due to U.S. actions they were under the impression that they would be granted independence at the end of the conflict. Near the end of the Spanish-American war, on June 12, 1898, the Filipinos declared the Philippines an independent nation. When the war was over the U.S. government purchased the Philippines from Spain to, as President McKinley put it, “uplift and civilize and Christianize them” (. When the Americans arrived, they took control of Manila and designated a perimeter which the Filipino rebels could not enter. On February 4, 1899 a Filipino man trying to cross the U.S. lines was shot and killed by an American soldier. That night there was an exchange of fire between the opposing armies. The next day, Emilio Aguinaldo, the leader of the rebel forces, sent someone to explain that the firing had been against his orders and to propose a neutral zone, but General Otis of the U.S. refused. This conflict was what led to the Philippine-American war (World Future Fund). As many as 1,000,000...
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.
Southeast Asia has been controlled by Imperialistic powers since 1400s. These nations become prized for the various countries natural resources, strategic location, and the new markets to be found. The geographical locations become one of the most important factors that lead to the development of each country separately. As we reach the 19th and 20th century, European, American and Asian imperialism still has its claws deep in Southeast Asia. Imperialists are the ones who decide and shape the nation’s leading them down the path to where they are now. Their location to other Southeast nations becomes another reason of interest, which eventually lends a hand in forming a nation.
There were several policies in place at the time, some which were put into place before the war, some during the war, and some after. The ratification of the annexation process was long and difficult. There were debates as to how to treat the Filipino people. One suggestion was to treat the Filipinos as dependents, and not citizens, like the Native Americans came to be treated. Many of the imperialists believed that the Filipinos were savages and harsh policies would give America control. The anti-imperialists were not exactly sure whether to treat them as peers or to set them free. I would treat them as equals, as normal people, as they are like everyone else. At the time they might not have been as technologically advanced as we were, and their government may have seemed primitive to ours. I think we should have worked with them to help create a government, rather than occupy and just take over.
A. A. The Philippines People, Poverty and Politics. New York: The New York Times. St. Martins's P, 1987. 1-225.