1.What is behind the methodology and methods In this part, the author's philosophical assumptions latent beneath the methodology and method. This ... ... middle of paper ... ...uch issues. Then, the discussion about giving an alternative way of conducting the research has applied with me a good chance to look at multiple facets of methodology and methods. Such practice could help new researchers to improve their skills and depth of thinking. Last but not the least, the examination of how theory research and practice interact within the context and potentially is indeed interesting and helpful.
Throughout the course of this essay, references will be made to various theorists and scholars to support assertions. When considering the value of historical analysis, one must first understand what historical analysis is. Jupp (2006: 135-137) states that historical analysis is a method of “disciplined and systematic analysis” in order to examine the past. Jupp elucidates to explain that historical analysis can be utilised to challenge prevailing assumptions and social theories because it records the history of both dominant powers and marginalised groups, enabling new interpretation and the development of new theories. When studying oppressed and minority groups, historical analysis is valuable in aiding the development of alternative models of social change.
In other words, the proposal allows you to create or negotiate the assignment according to your own interests. You may want to begin by asking critical questions that may lead you to refine your topic even more. Remember this essay is relatively short for a research paper so a more focused topic will serve you better. I strongly encourage you to ask questions rather than state a position at this point.
Most often, the purpose of argument is to present an idea, or influence people’s perception. In order to write an effective persuasive essay, the reason and specific goals for the essay must be analyzed and acknowledged. The audience must also be evaluated. Everyone is entitled
Charts, tables, and figures are often used to support the narrative, but I feel it is more helpful to the audience to explain the findings. Ultimately, I feel case studies and historical reviews are research initiatives that better integrate a scholarly practitioner
2. Literature review The literature review is to present the already known – researched information of the areas that are related and meaningful to this research study (Saunders et al. 2012). Thus, the literature review will not only contribute in getting a much greater understanding in the research topic but also will enable to identify the gaps that need to be researched or questions that are not clearly answered. By classifying and examining previous studies the appropriate information and clear understanding will be achieved that will allow and also ensure that the current study is not repeating the same research or answering same questions.
In an academic synthesis, you make explicit the relationships that you have inferred among separate sources. The skills you've already been practicing in this course will be vital in writing syntheses. Clearly, before you're in a position to draw relationships between two or more sources, you must understand what those sources say; in other words, you must be able to summarize these sources. It will frequently be helpful for your readers if you provide at least partial summaries of sources in your synthesis essays. At the same time, you must go beyond summary to make judgments - judgments based, of course, on your critical reading of your sources - as you have practiced in your reading responses and in class discussions.
To establish a platform for further discussion it is vital to provide some basic theoretical framework on the issue of comparative approach. Following the structure mentioned in the introduction of this paper, this section will be divided into several parts. To begin, many scholars have highlighted the importance of generating of a good research question (for instance, Mills, 1959; Locke & Golden-Biddle, 1997; Smith & Hitt, 2005; Starbuck, 2006). In the process of formulating of the research question two patterns can be identified referring to current research: gap-spotting and problematization. Indentifying or constructing gaps in the existing literature to be filled reflects the general trend among researches.
A clear connection also needs to be made between the current study’s underlying theory and the study’s findings (Theoretical Framework in Dissertations: A Brief Discussion, 2010). Each construct in the problem, purpose statement, and the research questions needs to have literature to support the construct. The understanding that is demonstrated should also relate to extended fields of knowledge that include the research problem. Obtaining the knowledge to demonstrate an understanding of the theories and concepts of the research problem is not an easy task. ... ... middle of paper ... ...n Development.
In order to revise this paper, I would have to start by making sure my thesis is clear and makes sense. Secondly, I would have to check to see if my evidence is relevant to the topic and that my analysis is well thought out and explains the purpose of the evidence. Therefore, using rhetorical analysis would be a vast help in my success for that specific