Planning and developing a good curriculum based assessment is vital for correct execution of mastery learning. The progress of specific learning units should explain exactly what is the teachers need from the students for proficiency. A few of the expectations that the teachers will require include, learning goals, learning outcomes, and learning objectives they are crucial to the student’s success. The declaring of these expectations is important to the success of the student. The practice would be achieved to the fullest if the students are allowed play an active role in decision making regarding learning goals and objectives. For the instructors it is important to remember that the gaining of information is not the only goal for students. …show more content…
It is an integral part of the overall assessment procedure. It serves to measure the learning of multiple units and concepts. They should be constructed before the course begins which allows the teacher to develop final learning goals and what students should be able to do when reaching these goals. A second, and more recent approach, suggests teachers form summative assessments towards the end of the course to take into account fluctuations and changes in the content taught. Grading assessments are important but should not be the only defining assessment for grading a student. Other grading criterion such as portfolios, projects, reports, and behavioral objectives should be taken into account. Grading and reporting should report accurate, quality information about what students have learned, what they can do, and whether their learning status is in line with expectations for that level. Grading and reporting methods should enhance not hinder teaching and …show more content…
What standards of performance are to be expected? When will Pupils will be held accountable for what is expected? The students should be informed about the standards of performance. (Standards are an explanation of the type of lesson to be presented, procedures to be followed, and behavioral expectations related to it, what the students are expected to do, what knowledge Or skills are to be demonstrated and in what manner.) I can explain how each chapter builds on the reader’s understanding of a character.
Create a minimum of six, no more than ten, problems/questions/tasks for students to complete that include a variety of test item types (selected response, short answer, extended written response, and/or performance). Is the item clear and concise?
Label each question with its
There are five standards listed under this domain and I only received the maximum amount of points for one of the standards. The standard that I exceeded the expectations on was creating a culturally inclusive environment. I receive the highest score here because it was evident during my interaction with the students that cultural inclusivity existed in the classroom. I will continue to create a culturally inclusive classroom that promotes safety, respect, and fairness for all students at my second teacher intern experience. Maximizing instructional time is a standard under this domain that I only received two of the three points on. Although the standard was met, in order for me to raise this score at my next experience I would need to work on my transitions and procedures more. I will be doing many activities during my lessons, and I will need to have efficient transitions and procedures to better manage my class time. This can be done by planning ahead and thinking about how students at this age level act. I would need to be very simplistic and thorough about procedures when working on activities that require moving. The next standard I will discuss is using multiple strategies to foster appropriate student behavior according to individual and situational needs. I met this standard at my last experience according to my score, but to obtain a higher score I will have to research ways
Assessment has been the greatest challenge in my development as a professional. My coursework as supported my growth in this area, especially in understanding the broad range of assessments used to support students’ growth and development. My courses have also supported my understanding of how ongoing observational assessment and standards-based measures can be used to inform instruction and support the cycle of observation, reflection and planning. Coursework
Referred to as “assessment of learning,” (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012, pg. 5) components of summative learning include evaluating, measuring, and making judgements about student knowledge, both on individual levels and group levels. Rather than supporting learning by way of formative assessment, summative assessment verifies learning, (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., Arter, 2012). Naturally, this is what interests educational stakeholders: administrators, parents, teachers, and those who create educational policies. (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012, pg. 5). Summative assessment historically and presently presents itself in the form of graded quizzes, tests, graded papers and presentations, district benchmark tests, state standardized tests, and college entrance
Assessments are an important part of teaching. Assessments are a good way for teachers to monitor students’ learning and understanding. Knowing students’ level of understanding can help teachers improve students’ learning and guide their instructions. In the future, I plan to continue assessing students in multiple ways such as, asking questions, illustrations and writing to adjust my instruction. I also plan to encourage students to assess their own work so they are involved in their own learning as well as look for ways to “employ technology to support assessment
There are different methods and uses of assessment that are used in the Education system, the reason for this, is that not all assessments serve the same purpose for its methodologies, the feedback that learners receive needs to correspond with the purpose of the assessment. (Sieborger, 1998)Thus educators tend to make use of multiple assessments to establish a fair and just measurement of the learner’s capability. This essay will extensively describe and analyse the tensions between the two methods of assessment: Summative assessment and Formative assessment and further reflect on their ability to integrate.
This assessment would take up about 30-40 minute class period. I would put my student into groups of three, using a random group generator. The smaller group will allow them to work more closely with one another and there are not as many students giving feedback at once. My assessment would have six problems, a mix of mathematical problems and vocabulary or content based questions, the assessment can be found in the Appendix. How this would work is I would have the first person who was on the list start. I would give the groups five minutes to work on that problem. The first person would start the problem. For example, if it was a word problem, they would provide the first step to solving the problem, then hand it to their next partner, the next student would then add to the problem, this would keep going until the problem was solved. If at any point one of the students believes there was a mistake, they would then discuss as a group and fix the problem. If it were a content or vocabulary problem, they would add to the answer and modify it, much like if it was a word
Assessment, in the context of education, was defined by Lambert, D (2000, pag 4) as the processs of gathering, recording and using information about pupils' responses to educational tasks. Despite some can consider that assessment is separated from the learning process, assessment is, in fact, an essential part of the learning proccess. Maguire, M. and Dillon, J. (2007, pag 213) pointed out that assessment is intrincately bound-up in the teaching-learning cycle.
Before the lesson is prepared, the teachers must have a clear understanding of the objectives of the lesson to be taught. By having an understanding of what they students will able to accomplish at the end of the lesson, the content remains focused and thorough. The teacher must then express these objectives to the students including the standards for performance. Students can then be held accountable for expectations that are known.
Assessments are according to Edglossary.org (2014), “the wide variety of methods that educators use to evaluate, measure, and document the academic readiness, learning process, and skill acquisition of students”. Assessments can be used to identify several important aspects of learning and development. First, they can be used to distinguish a child’s strengths and weaknesses as well as measure specific knowledge and skills. Assessments can also be used to demonstrate what a child has learned and what they understand (“Assessment,” 2014). My opinion of assessment has not changed; however, now I understand how to use assessments that will help ensure that I am providing the most benefits for my students.
This article discussed the learning philosophy called mastery learning in three ways: the benefit of mastery learning, the role of assessment in mastery learning, and the right ways to apply mastery learning in courses.
Introduced by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom around 1968 as a theory that would reduce achievement gaps between students, mastery learning has become a very popular school of thought. In a mastery-learning classroom, teachers track a sequence of concepts and skills in certain individuals. After the initial instruction is given and the instructor feels his or her students have reached a point where they are ready for testing, an assessment is handed out which usually gives students an idea of what is to be presented to them in the future. Students are also able to give feedback which helps teachers identify where their students are struggling and can pinpoint ineffective strategies.
In spite of the importance of assessment in education, few teachers receive proper training on how to design or analyze assessments. Due to this, when teachers are not provided with suitable assessments from their textbooks or instructional resources, teachers construct their own in an unsystematic manner. They create questions and essay prompts comparable to the ones that their teachers used, and they treat them as evaluations to administer when instructional activities are completed predominantly for allocating students' grades. In order to use assessments to improve instruction and student learning, teachers need to change their approach to assessments by making sure that they create sound assessments. To ensure that their assessments are sound they need include five basic indicators that can be used as steps to follow when creating assessments. The first of these indicators and the first step a teacher must take when creating a sound assessme...
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
The mastery learning theory derived from the work of John B. Carroll’s (Guskey, 2001; Bloom, 1968). Carroll’s (1963) proposed a model of school learning in which all students received the same quality of instruction (Guskey, 2001; Bloom, 1968). According to Carroll (1963), the education system should grant the same quality of instruction and appropriate timeframe to all students to ensure their success and mastery of a subject (Bloom, 1968). Carroll (1963) claimed that the assumption of students’ aptitude to learn a specific subject varied upon the learning level of each learner (Guskey, 2011). Consequently, Carroll’s views about students’ aptitude and learning level encouraged Bloom to develop the mastery learning theory (Guskey,
Many schools have different frameworks which outline what makes for effective teaching and learning in a classroom, these follow quite closely with the teacher’s standards.