Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
About imperial presidency
About imperial presidency
Imperial presidency example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imperial Presidency
2 examples from 19th century
- Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus
- Jefferson bought Louisiana, wasn’t his Constitutional right
- Jackson breaks up national bank into many “pet banks”
- Jackson forced out Cherokee Indians even after Supreme Court decided on Indian side: “Supreme Court has made their decision; now let them enforce it.”
4 examples from 20th century
- FDR declared neutrality but sold Destroyers to Britain (Lend Lease)
- Truman ceased a steel mill during Cold War because he didn’t like how it was running
- Nixon ruined executive privilege, kept illegal actions secret until Supreme Court ruled it as a criminal investigation. (Watergate)
- Nixon bombed Cambodia without Congressional approval, without congress or people knowing, caused country to fall under communism.
- Reagan wanted to fund the Contras in Nicaragua who wanted to overthrow Communist rule, congress did not approve, so he sold weapons to terrorist group in Iran and used the money from the sells to fun Contras behind Congress’ back.
-After FDR, no other president has approval to declare wars but invaded countries anyway, i.e. Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
5 factors which lead to Imperial Presidents
- The world has become more advanced, Interdependent economy
- The changing times causes people to want a powerful president
- Foreign policy is main factor, because the decision to go to war (Doctrines)
- Gradual change after states of emergencies, i.e. great depression, cold war, and now 9/11
- The belief that U.S. is super power, therefore leader of U.C. should be as powerful
- The party system falling apart, party leaders were weak, organizations were irrelevant, and president was the focus due to media (internet, TV)
- The decay of parties left him with control of political scene
- The change in economy, gives government new powers, but the opportunity goes to President (FDR’s new deal)
- Nuclear age gave president good reason for executive privilege because no one else should know.
to declare war was vested in the Congress. This decision set the stage for the
When Nixon was inaugurated, he took a sworn oath to protect the people and the country. He lied to his people. He states, “The major problem on the Watergate is simply to clean the thing up by having whoever was responsible admit what happened. Certainly I am satisfied that nobody in the White House had any knowledge or approved any such activity.” (Memoirs 646).
The generalization that, “The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was more a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790s than a change in that policy,” is valid. Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the Native Americans out of their native lands. Many people wanted to contribute to this removal of the Cherokees and their society. Knox proposed a “civilization” of the Indians. President Monroe continued Knox’s plan by developing ways to rid of the Indians, claiming it would be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson ultimately fulfilled the plan. First of all, the map [Document A] indicates the relationship between time, land, and policies, which affected the Indians. The Indian Tribes have been forced to give up their land as early as the 1720s. Between the years of 1721 and 1785, the Colonial and Confederation treaties forced the Indians to give up huge portions of their land. During Washington's, Monroe's, and Jefferson's administration, more and more Indian land was being commandeered by the colonists. The Washington administration signed the Treaty of Holston and other supplements between the time periods of 1791 until 1798 that made the Native Americans give up more of their homeland land. The administrations during the 1790's to the 1830's had gradually acquired more and more land from the Cherokee Indians. Jackson followed that precedent by the acquisition of more Cherokee lands. In later years, those speaking on behalf of the United States government believed that teaching the Indians how to live a more civilized life would only benefit them. Rather than only thinking of benefiting the Indians, we were also trying to benefit ourselves. We were looking to acquire the Indians’ land. In a letter to George Washington, Knox says we should first is to destroy the Indians with an army, and the second is to make peace with them. The Indian Trade and Intercourse Act of 1793 began to put Knox’s plan into effect. The federal government’s promise of supplying the Indians with animals, agricultural tool...
The removal of the Native Americans was an egocentric move on Jackson’s part. Jackson was only able to see how our removal would benefit the government but was not concerned at all about our values and culture. “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the Indians” (91). This statement, included in the State of the Union Address, exhibits how Jackson was quick to place blame on the Indians. He was basically saying that if there were any disputes between the general and state governments, it would be because of the Indian’s choice to not leave the land. Jackson was attempting to hold the Indians accountable for a matter that they had no say in. It is evident that Jackson could have are less about the Indian’s home land, where we were birthed and raised our kids. It is clear that the sentimental value of the land did not concern Jackson at all. Jackson felt that he offered us an equitable exchange, but his family was not the one being forcefully removed from their birthland to go to an unfamiliar land. “What good m...
...on materialism and social class. While novel is widely considered a zeitgeist of the time period, it is also a warning for the American Dream. Although the Dream is not Marxist materialism, it is certainly not traditional individualism and freedom. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby poses a question: what is the American Dream?
The Walt Disney Company is a highly diversified media and entertainment company that has been growing by leaps and bounds since its inception in the late 1920’s. In the past few decades, The Walt Disney Company has expanded into numerous markets and diversified its business greatly. The company states that their corporate strategy is targeted at creating high-quality family content, exploiting technological innovations to make entertainment experiences more memorable, and expanding internationally. Upon studying the happenings of the company throughout the years, it is easy to see that the company is executing this strategy well through numerous strategic moves in the industry.
“What’s most appealing about ‘Gatsby’ might be its mood of witty hopelessness, of vivacious self-destructiveness” (Rothman 1). Both the novel and film portray the self-destructive behavior that every character participates in. Fitzgerald often saw this behavior in American culture and expanded on it, as explained by Rothman, “Fitzgerald understood the pleasures
The Great American Dream has been the reason why people work and try their best to move up in life. In the 1920’s, America had finished fighting in World War I, and the economy was booming. Americans were partying, carefree people, and were heavily influenced by fashion. There was a serious change in the lifestyle of hundreds and thousands of people, it was a new way of living. After the stock market crash in 1929, life seemed to be meaningless, and it was too difficult to be someone that was carefree, the Great American Dream became unreachable. In the great American novel, The Great Gatsby, author F. Scott Fitzgerald uses the character Gatsby to demonstrate the difficulty of obtaining the Great American Dream.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby shows the American Dream is not obtainable by any person, no matter what the social economical level one might be born into, and its pursuit comes at a heavy price. Jay Gatsby, George Wilson, Tom Buchanan are just a few characters that risk everything to achieve the American Dream, but are incapable of ever reaching that euphoria. Dreaming, or “an idea or vision that is created in your imagination and that is not real” i s not part of this world and is pure fantasy, but Fitzgerald’s characters still think it is achievable.
Walt Disney stated “it all started with a mouse.” Little did Mr. Disney know what an empire his name and his mouse would create all while having such a large impact on American culture and society. Disney has proven a brand with iconic characters and images that he was able to create a connection with not only the average American family, but also allowed other cultures to have the same connection and experience. Disney’s characters had the ability to be recognize by a large number of people, allowing Disney to have a broad market to serve making the park a safe and comfortable place for large audience of American families, while other parks limited their target audience to young adults and
Many writers have taken particular interest in the idea of the American dream and have chosen to criticize, fantasize about, define, and even find humor in this indefinable idea that is so close to the heart of all Americans. F. Scott Fitzgerald uses the nebulous American Dream in his famous novel The Great Gatsby. Fitzgerald manipulates the notion to express a very materialistic version of the story. His story is centered on one character that essentially reaches this American Dream; however, the means by which he does this do not stay true to the idea’s origins. This tale serves to share the story of a man that loses his own identity as he is overcome by this national ethos.
The simple definition of the American dream is a state of happiness a person hopes to achieve by obtaining materialistic prosperity through hard work. This however has not always been the dream. In early America the dream of many was to venture west, find land, and start a family, but as time progressed the dream has transformed into a need for materialistic possessions such as a car or a large house. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s book The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald reveals the how corrupt the American Dream has become and how truly irrelevant money and worldly possessions are to becoming genuinely satisfied. He does this through his portrayal of Gatsby’s confused love for Daisy or the idea of Daisy, Daisy and Tom Buchanan’s marriage, and the death of Gatsby.
Through Fitzgerald’s symbolic description of Gatsby, he explores the extent of the American Dream’s deceptive nature that slowly destroys a person and his/her morals. During the Roaring 20s it was very common for people to project illusions to mask who they truly were; to fit in, it was almost essential to have one to survive in the highly materialistic and deceitful society. Nick is introduced as the objective narrator...
With the fall of the Soviet Union after the Cold War the United States came out of the conflict as the supreme superpower in world politics. This caused the system to change from bipolar to unipolar. It is theorized
The idea of the “American Dream,” has been widely addressed by the famous writer, F. Scott Fitzgerald, in his several novels, especially in The Great Gatsby. Published in 1925, The Great Gatsby reveals a particular example of those who are devotees of pursuing the American Dream but eventually end up by sacrificing themselves. The concept of the American Dream can be totally different for people, all of whom have their own understanding of these words. In brief, the major essence of American culture has always emphasized on the value of the individual, the pursuit of freedom, the improvement of competition, and the promotion of realism. The common truth of this novel is that each character has their American Dream, which gives them the opportunity