Idiot Nation Research Paper

918 Words2 Pages

Should children attend public schools? Public schools around the nation are in severe need of improvement. According to Michael Moore writer of "Idiot Nation” and John Taylor Gatto writer of "Against School” both authors imply that public schools are "deeply flawed”. Students attending public schools have lower attendance rates and a harder time progressing academically. Public schools should properly teach their students because a well prepared student will be prepared for college and society. Many schools have a low teacher to student ratio, which causes little interaction with students, also insufficient amount of programs leading to deprive learning. This causes schools to have low attendance. Through increased funding by the government …show more content…

Larger classrooms with better equipment can improve schools because students wouldn 't be overcrowded. Students need to be relaxed in order for them to learn and this what most public schools don 't have. In Michael Moore’s "Idiot Nation” he states that "Almost 10 percent of U.S. public schools have enrollments that are more than 25 percent greater than capacity of their permanent buildings” (137). Buildings like Moore stated are over filled, but if we do update our public school buildings. In the article "New Construction vs. Renovation for Older School Facilities” suggest "Teachers, students and administrators have the opportunity to create environments, in conjunction with the architect and interior designer, that enhance and support their educational philosophy” (Facilities net). No doubt that having better and bigger buildings will increase education but first the schools need to get enough funding to modernize facilities to meet with the rising …show more content…

Students will be able to interact freely with teachers because there would be an increase in teachers. Public schools have a scarcity in teachers, which causes minimal learning and often leaves students out of discussions. Studies show that smaller classrooms tend to do better then larger classrooms. In the article “The Importance of a Low Student to Teacher Ratio” it states “Fewer students means that teachers have more manageable workloads and more time to work one-on-one with students; they can engage them more, try out different activities and lessons that might not be feasible in a larger class size, and, because they have fewer students to monitor, they tend to spend less time on classroom management issues, such as discipline” (Global Post). By hiring more teachers to school it allows for smaller classrooms. Having smaller classrooms leads to an increase in learning because teachers would be able to work with students individually more often and teachers would also have more time to prepare material for the student to learn. Another reason a higher teacher to student ratio benefits schools is that students could be more engaged. The article also mentions, “Conversely, in a class of 15 students, students may feel more accountable or more comfortable participating in class discussions -- and this greater degree of accountability can certainly lead to better

Open Document