Ice Fili Case Summary

497 Words1 Page

Russian ice-cream market is not attractive because of many reasons. By looking at the five forces analysis, we can say that there is a high threat of new entry by potential competitors because there is no barrier to entry the market. There is no switching cost and brand recognition, that’s why buyers have high bargaining power, and the bargaining power of suppliers is low because of the numerous suppliers; for example Ice-Fili used three to four suppliers for each ingredient. Also, there is a high threat of substitution because in 2000, the production of ice cream declined %3.5 while production of confectionaries, soft drinks and beer was increasing. Besides, ice cream producers spent less than $5 million for advertisement while beer market and soft drink industry spent more than $90 million. There is an intense competition in Russian ice-cream market because there are both regional producers and foreign companies. Regional producers have cost …show more content…

Firstly, this market is price sensitive so regional producers have the price advantage because they could produce and sell cheaper than foreign ice cream companies. Moreover, there were differentiation advantage in the Russian market. While Ice Fili had the differentiation advantage thanks to all natural ingredients and no preservatives in their ice cream, foreign companies had not. Furthermore, Russian open market economy encouraged free enterprise and competition through privatization and price liberalization which can be considered as an advantage for foreign ice cream companies. Also, there are wider distribution channels in the market which was another competitive advantage for larger regional and foreign companies. Advertising could be considered as one of the competitive advantage for larger foreign companies. Finally, Ice Fili is the best-known brand in the Russian market which has an historical advantage than other foreign

Open Document