Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare Buddhism and Christianity
Comparing Buddhism and Christianity
Compare and contrast the Buddha and Jesus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare Buddhism and Christianity
Question 2.
Within the last five to ten years of my life a lot has changed. One of those things that have changed is the way I see theology, the study of God. Five years ago I had already started working in ministry as a senior and serving pastor of RCDM ministries in Gastonia, NC. Having been brought up in a very conservative theology, in other words, in a very legalistic kind of setting, at the beginning you was very difficult. For once, the legalistic and closed-minded theology helped on a personal level, nevertheless, when one is in that kind of mind-set, it doesn’t take too long when you are trying to impose that kind of mentality to others. And this is not what we are here for as Christians, we are here to show the love of God to everyone,
…show more content…
In his book “the future of illusion.” Freud states that religious training is the product of weak minds and frail intellect. The argument is made under the assumption that in the long run nothing can withstand reason and experience, and that religion contradicts itself by offering the mystical and the realness of life in one setting. On the contrary, this humanistic way of looking at God does not change my way of looking at God. Yes, God may be invisible; nevertheless, he’s real. Perhaps, the most renowned contemporary god in today’s society would be “Self.” When one sees he’s or her own needs and wants, the psychology of this would be called narcissism. Psychology today identifies it as “an extreme selfishness with a grandiose view of one’s own talent and cravings for admiration.” Buddha and Jesus’ teaching were basically similar. The Buddha said: that desired was a root cause of suffering and the people should say to eliminate desire. On the other hand, Jesus thought to seek first the kingdom of God and everything else would be added later. The Buddha said that he was not divine; Jesus on the other hand, said that he was the Son of God. The main difference between the Buddha and Jesus is that Buddha died and still dead, Jesus also died but on the third day Jesus arose from the tomb and He is in Heaven preparing a place for you and me. In my perspective, Hinduism has a weak theology, for you if you need and a specific god to do one thing and another god to do something else, it doesn’t make sense to me. In Hinduism and theology there are more than 3000 gods and goddesses. Whereas in Christian theology we have only one God, one who is all-powerful, all-knowing, and that’s all I need. Atheistic and I
In the Light of Reverence is a film about the destruction and exploitation of the sacred lands of the people who have worshipped them for years: the Native Americans. Freedom of religion is something Americans take pride in. However, many religions are still looked down upon for their practices which is displayed clearly in this film. It upsets me greatly to hear how ignorant many people are about the Native American religion. They call the prayer bundles “dirty laundry” and say nature has no “similarities with the church at all” (In the Light of Reverence). Religion has never had a specific definition. All religions have different practices and themes. It just so happens that Native Americans practice their religion in regard to nature. Nature is sacred land to Native Americans and as one women said in the film, “you can’t have a religion without the land” (In the Light of Reverence). Native Americans have always believed that natural world is holy. Destroying the Earth will never lead to world peace (Lyons 11). I agree with the Native Americans that we need to have more respect for the Earth we live on. Chief Oren Lyons said in his essay, “we need to learn how to respect nature” (Lyons 6). If we keep treating the
There have been many theological texts and authors that have influenced me in regards to my faith. The text that has been the most influential to my understanding of my calling would have to be What Is God by John F. Haught. I usually refer back to this text whenever I need a reminder of why I am trying to become a pastor. This text was assigned to me in my Basic Issues of Faith and Life class at Bethel College. Within this book, Haught tackles the basic question of “What is God?” Now when writing this, it was easy to see that most of it was directed at atheists. Most of Haught’s books are a battle between theists and atheists. Even though I was a Christian
...en civilization and the individual. Living in a nation still recovering from a brutally violent war (Germany), Freud began to criticize organized religion as a collective neurosis, or mental disorder. Freud, a strong proponent of atheism, argued that religion tamed asocial instincts and created a sense of community because of the shared set of beliefs. This undoubtedly helped a civilization. However, at the same time organized religion also exacts an enormous psychological cost to the individual by making him or her perpetually subordinate to the primal figure embodied by God.
I'm not a tremendously religious person. I don't attend religious services, I don't say prayers before bedtime (or much of any other time), I don't read a section of my holy book on a regular schedule... you get the picture. The closest I'd come to claiming a personal faith is to call myself a sort of armchair Daoist.
y Name is Irma Rivera J. I’m currently in my second year at HCC in pursuit of a Business Degree majoring in Accounting. I’m taking this course to complete my Humanities requirement, and because I’ve always been enthusiastic and intrigued with religion as a whole. I was raised up Catholic but as I grew older I’m more open to many religions and don’t feel I belong to any one particular religion but a blend of many. I would classify myself a Christian Omnist. (I just learned
Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud were two prominent psychoanalysts with distinct attitudes and approaches towards religion. They had a lot of mutual theories at some time in their lives and had a profound friendship. In fact, Jung was to be the successor of Freud in his position as president of the International Psychoanalytic Association. Nonetheless, Jung established several new theories and differences with Freud. After years of friendship the both separated in 1913. There were three main areas of religion which Jung and Freud disagreed on. Jung alleged that religion was, in fact, very advantageous to society, unlike Freud, who was wholly against religion. Jung believed religion was a natural expression of the collective unconscious whereas Freud believed it was a collective neurosis. Overall, Jung thought that religiousness was a way of aiding the process of individuation. On the contrary, Freud believed it to lessen the feelings of hostility and guilt that continue to dominate the relationship with the father figure until it is replaced by “God” as a surrogate father. Thus, making religion an obsessive-compulsive neurosis aimed at avoiding death. I will be using Christianity as a basis to show the relationship of both Jung's and Freud's theories with religion since Christianity has the biggest following in the world.
A framework of five models is shared: Enemies, Spies, Colonialists, Neutral Parties, and Allies. The Enemies model either associates no relationship between Christianity and psychology. The Spies model focuses on what works best for them from both Christianity and psychology. Colonialists use psychology only to the degree that it fits theology. Neutral Parties model holds that psychology and theology are independent with possible correlation between findings of the two, however that is about as far as one discipline may encroach on the other. Allies, the model considered by Entwistle, acknowledges that while psychology and theology are separate, they are still dependent, based upon the underlying unity of truth of God’s written word and His Works (Entwistle, 2010). The underpinning of the integrative approach to psychology and Christianity appears to be that of anthropology; this may be seen in the two books, God g...
Freud says, religions say that sacred realities are the divine beings who dwell in some other useable realm. He states that these ideas are illusions, mere wishes. "Religious ideas are given out as teachings, are not precipitates of experience or end results of thinking: they are illusions, fulfilments of the oldest, strongest and most urgent wishes of mankind"(pg.38). He says that religion is an illusion, and it's the origin of the physical human mind. He says that sacred reality is a reality as we wish it were because there is no evidence to prove it. "Illusion itself sets no store by verification"(pg.40). People believe in gods (divine beings), because they need to believe that he will reconcile us to cruelty of fate and forgive us for our sins. Freud says that people gave the name God to some abstraction, which they created themselves not realizing that he is a metaphysical shadow. Since there is no prove that Gods really exist, to Freud they are a mere fabrications brought on by humans wishful thinking.
As far back as I can remember I have been raised in a Christian setting. Upon coming to Williams I knew I would be entering another world in which I would have to learn to view and accept other individuals inputs and values regardless of our differences. It is interesting to see the diversity of the campus religiously despite the predominance of certain ethnicities. Like Hegel, Schleiermacher, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard I actually have my own ideologies behind the concept of religion.
Freud in his writing suggests that religion is an “illusion.” Not your typical deception of something, rather misapprehension of religion. Additionally, Freud provides brand new eyes to look at religion and its construct of civilization. He further provides evidence of his own, as well as suggesting a psychoanalytical approach to religion.
“Most Christians would rather die than think; in fact they do” (White, 17). This quote from Bertrand Russel is thought provoking and a most appropriate way to start a book on using your mind for God. A Mind for God by James Emery White is a fantastic piece of literature that delves deep into what it means to truly follow God with your mind. In just under one hundred pages White explains why, how, and what we need to follow God with all of our mind. “And he answered, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself” (Luke 10:27, ESV).
In Sylvia Plath’s poem “Mirror”, the reader takes a look into the messages presented and compares them with the reflections that are cast in a mirror and images in a lake. When reading this poem, we discover that the speaker is the actual reflection that gives the interpretation of its views. The first interpretation is shown as a mirror on the wall “I am silver and exact. I have no preconceptions.” (1), second as the water in the lake because she states “Now I am a lake.” (10), and third through the eyes of an aging woman that is revealed in line 17 “In me she has drowned a young girl, and in me an old woman/ Rises toward her day after day…”
If you have your eyes and ears and your feet, it is easy to take advantage of the fact that they 'll always be there. But say for example, you have no hand; try to tie your shoe. Or say you have no hand and no foot, try entire shoe. How difficult would it be to simply pull a shirt over your head, if you had no arms to help you? So it is with the body of Christ, each and every limb needs the other to function completely and fully within the church. It is not by accident that God created us each differently; we don 't think the same we don 't act the same we don 't see things the same. Each part of our body has a different function to hear, smell, to see life through her eyes, each individual piece holds the different power. Without that piece the body can 't function the way that it should function fully. As the body of Christ, we cannot function fully and completely without those around us doing their part.
My definition of religion has mostly stayed the same, but my perception of it has changed. At the beginning of the class, I assumed religion was something you believed based on your moral principles. I now believe that those moral principles are based on the religion that you believe in. Your religion changes your perception of the world and how to go about in it. Your religion tells you what is right and wrong in the world and answers all of the big questions one asks. Religion according to our book is, “A pattern of beliefs and practices that expresses and enacts what a community regards as sacred and/or ultimate about life” (Van Voorst 6). That definition was one thing that really got me thinking about my own personal idea of what religion
God must be one, God must be necessary, God is unlimited, God must be the ultimate source of everything, God must be worthy of worship.