I/O Psychology: Functionalism, Technology, Training, and Cognitive Psychology

2021 Words5 Pages

I/O Psychology: Functionalism, Technology, Training, and Cognitive Psychology
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate how functionalism and cognitive psychology align with Industrial/Organizational (I/O) psychology, and defend the use functionalism and cognitive psychology, schools of thought to support the research topic on the effect of technological advancements, such as avatars, holograms, and computer/web-based instruction in employee training and development. In addition this paper serves as a call to action for those in the I/O psychology field to become leaders in research and the development of theories that practical applications in the work environment.
Schools of Thought: Functionalism and Cognitive Psychology
I/O psychology in the United States is the result of shifts in the cultural trends of society from the emergence of Darwinism, paradigm transfer to functionalism, the industrial revolution, capitalism, and scientific advancement (Bingham, 1953; Katzell & Austin, 1992; Koppes & Pickren, 2007; Landy, 1997). I/O psychology studies the how and why of living organisms to adapt their mental processes and behaviors, which is a central tenet of functionalism in the work environment and functionalism with its beliefs in experimental research allows I/O psychologists to conduct mental tests, experiments, and quasi experiments on human and animal subjects; thereby, allowing industrialism and capitalism to flourish by helping organizations to secure and maintain their competitive advantage (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014; Katzell and Austin, 1992; Koppes & Pickren, 2007; Landy, 1997). Functionalism aligns with the research paper on technological advances in the work environment as it applies to training and development of ...

... middle of paper ...

...al and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 128-148. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01419.
Turnage, J. J. (1990). The challenge of new workplace technology for psychology. American Psychologist, 45(2), 171-178. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.171
Tzei, L., Su-Mae, T., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The Effects of Peer-Like and Expert-Like Pedagogical Agents on Learners' Agent Perceptions, Task-Related Attitudes, and Learning Achievement. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 275-286.
Wan, Z., Compeau, D., & Haggerty, N. (2012). The effects of self-regulated learning processes on e-learning outcomes in organizational settings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(1), 307-339. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290109
Wankel, C. (2009). Management education using social media. Organization Management Journal (Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.), 6(4), 251-262. doi:10.1057/omj.2009.34

More about I/O Psychology: Functionalism, Technology, Training, and Cognitive Psychology

Open Document