Paul seems to make it out as something that we struggle through as students and can’t bear to hear the teacher say another word. Lectures are important, if done correctly, students do enjoy it. Students can speak their mind, compare and contrast, disagree and agree etc. we shouldn’t throw that away for mere view or thought of active learning. Active learning will not fit all courses, such as humanities, talking about ancient art works is all you can do in a sense because you can’t magically uncover another Picasso in the back of your classroom closet. Seems like the research that Paul provides in her article is from people who have never heard of a good lecture and have failed to observe what really happens in lecture. Her point is not clear. Is she talking about boring lectures? Good and bad lectures?
...d uses its appeal to make the student engaged. Students respond well when class discussion is open and formal. All too often, teachers design their lectures to. Students respond well when class discussion is open and formal. All too often, teachers design their lectures with the mindset that they need to facilitate their job through PowerPoint presentations and long lectures with little student interaction. There is something to be said about the accessibility of professors being approachable; however, having a class discussion that operates well creates the small interactive community both inside and out of the classroom. Ultimately, universities have the opportunity to mold the rather plastic minds of young adults; they need to be willing to take a hard look at how they instruct their students and offer new and invigorating teaching techniques in their classes.
I am using Cornell Method because It is an organized and systematic strategy for recording and reviewing lecture notes, easy formatting for pulling out major concept and ideas. It is simple and efficient, and saves time and effort
Although most of his evaluations are favorable, he was fearful of the comments that his class was also enjoyable; Edmundson doesn’t teach to amuse nor interest. He possesses the genuine passion of spreading knowledge resulting in hearing the students talk of how the course changed them as a person, an individual. (Edmundson, p.390). Addressing the culture of the university Edmundson believes they are more devoted to the consumer consumption and entertainment values. The quality of education is declining due to giving the consumer what they want, rather what they need. Higher learning is shifting towards a society that is sophisticated with technology. The marketing side of decisions that are made with the finances and education are primarily for money being placed their pockets and making sure it stays there due to their tenure and permanent seats. They will always have a job, but what about the decisions for the quality of the education? Or having to cover the expenses of staying current with the newest technology and amenities as well? In order to keep balance in all of this the school will usually raise tuition which causes a chain reaction of rising costs for everything. With the rise of costs, school becomes undesirable to the students who aren’t able to afford it, or the ones who go into debt
-Professor from the University of Iowa discusses the mentality of students selling term papers via the Internet. Defines the kinds of term paper sources on the web. Explains how downloadable papers threaten education. The author gives suggestions to faculty members do minimize the threat of Internet plagiarism. Gives possible solutions to put downloading term papers to legitimate educational use.
Often accounts of the past, fragments of a story, and the author’s own interpretations are the result of personal bias. Carr conducted his research with a specific theory in mind, and made selections based off what aligned with his interests. He cites a recently published study of online reading habits, conducted by scholars from University College London. The shcolars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors to two popular research sites, one operated by the British Library and one by a U.K. educational consortium, that provide access to journal articles, e-books, and other sources of written information. Apparently, they found that people using the sites exhibited, “a form of skimming activity,” hopping from one source to another. He offers that “Sometimes they’d save a long article, but there’s no evidence that they ever went back and actually read it.” (7). He’s implying the opposition, while in fact, if there’s no evidence that they did read it, there’s equally no evidence that they didn’t. Furthermore, after researching the article the actual quotes states, “Academic users have strong consumer instincts and research shows that they will squirrel away content in the form of downloads, especially when there are free offers. In spite of this behavior and the very short session times that we witness, there is no evidence as to the extent to which these
Lecture format is developed over centuries, that present information to people about a particular subject and is highly accepted in field of education. In New York Times essay "Are College Lectures Unfair?" Annie Murphy Paul, a science writer, asks "Does the college lecture discriminate? Is it biased against undergraduates who are not white, male, and affluent?" as well as favors active learning approaches against traditional lecture style, while on the other side the author, Molly, Worthen in her essay "Lecture me. Really" discuses the importance of traditional lectures, as well as feels how it is faded from teaching methods in favor of "active learning" method. Being a student
Personally at this point, out of the four 3-hour lectures, only one has any real interaction with the instructor. A far as the educational value of the four courses, I couldn’t get the same out of an online course. We as students are all capable of reading chapters in a book and looking at power points, but we need to be taught, understand and realize what is on those slides and the reasons they are important… “Not just asked, did you get that?”! So, to say that some of us students are frustrated, is to say the
Loh explains that not every college professor is properly taught how to give a lecture, making it difficult for students to get the correct education from a professor who isn’t trained to explain the material. Various colleges and universities are starting to stray away from the traditional lecture and begin a more hands on approach to teaching a college course, while professors are looking to get rid of the college lecture completely. A research study showed classes that had an interactive approach as opposed to the traditional style resulted in better academic grades and a “36 percent drop in class failures.” Many educators prefer
The innovation and expansion of Internet utilization, experts scholarly and business are depending on electronic assets for data, examination and information. The Internet gives a distinct access to an ocean of data, information, and learning; in addition, this endless measure of data is accessible in a matter of seconds, instead of hours or days. The simple entry, accessibility, up-to-the-second auspiciousness, and inconceivability of online assets is bringing about numerous experts, on the other hand, to renounce the utilization of print sources. Online assets are advantageous to lead insightful examination and 'may be helpful, however they have weaknesses that make print sources important for submitting amazing assignments' (Dilevko & Gottieb, 2002).