Human Torture Should Not be Continued

2331 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: united Nations eassay

The United Nations defines torture as any act by which severe physical or mental pain or suffering is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining information or a confession, or punishing a person for an act that he is suspected of having committed. Torture also includes intimidating or coercing a person for any reason based on discrimination of any kind when a person acting in an official capacity inflicts pain or suffering (Convention Against Torture para. 2). Although some people believe that torture is acceptable, in reality it is neither an acceptable nor a reliable method for obtaining information and should not be continued.

In his article, When Is Torture Legal, Josh Clark discusses the convention on torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment held by the United Nations in 1984. This convention resulted in an international treaty signed by 74 countries, including the United States, which strictly forbids the act of torture as well as outsourcing torture to other countries where such methods are legal. There are no exceptional circumstances whatsoever which can be used as a justification for torture (Clark para. 4). Torture has been used through history as a means of interrogation, punishment, and coercion. While certainly a step in the right direction, the 1984 prohibition on torture has been violated repeatedly, both within the United States as well as in other countries.

Maureen Ramsay describes once such violation in her article “Can the Torture of Terrorist Suspects be Justified?” United States agents at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan used interrogation techniques that they termed ‘torture lite’. Prisoners were kept standing or kneeling for long periods with their arms chained...

... middle of paper ...

...ghraib.html?scp=2>.

Mazzetti, Mark and Scott Shane. “Interrogation Memos Detail Harsh Tactics by the C.I.A.” The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. 16 Apr. 2009. Web. 09 Apr. 2011. .

"No Torture. No Exceptions." The Washington Monthly. Jan-Feb 2008. Web. 06 Apr. 2011. .

Ramsay, Maureen. "Can the Torture of Terrorist Suspects Be Justified?" International Journal of Human Rights 10.2 (2006): 103-119. EBSCO. Web. 24 Mar. 2011.

“Yes, It Was Torture, and Illegal.” The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. 14 Mar. 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2011. < http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/opinion/04mon1.html?scp=1&sq=Yes,%20It%20Was%20Torture,%20and%20Illegal%20&st=cse>.

Show More
Related

  • Michael Levin's Essay: The Case For Torture

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Who wouldn’t have agreed? Yes, torture is cruel but it is less cruel than the substitute in many positions. Killing Hitler wouldn’t have revived his millions of victims nor would it have ended war. But torture in this predicament is planned to bring no one back but to keep faultless people from being sent off. Of course mass murdering is far more barbaric than torture. The most influential argument against using torture as a penalty or to get an acknowledgment is that such practices ignore the rights of the particulars. Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” discusses both sides of being with and being against torture. This essay gets readers thinking a lot about the scenarios Levin mentioned that torture is justified. Though using pathos, he doesn’t achieve the argument as well as he should because of the absence of good judgment and reasoning. In addition to emotional appeal, the author tries to make you think twice about your take on

    Read More

  • Advanced Interrogation Techniques the United States

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ross, Brian, and Richard Esposito. "CIA's Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described." ABC News. ABC News Network, 08 Nov. 2005. Web. 08 Mar. 2014. .

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiment of The 1960s

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ross, Brian and Richard Esposito. “CIA's Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described.” 18 Nov. 2005. Web. 6 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • Is Torture Justified?: Is Torture Justified?

    1042 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of torture is nothing new. It was done in the past and it’s done now in the 21st century. Without saying one side is right and the other side is wrong, let us discuss the part that we agree on and find common ground. We as Americans want to protect Americans from harms. So how do we prevent that from happening without torturing? It is impossible to get answer without some sort of questioning and intimidation techniques, since we know captured prisoners during war are not easily going to give up information. We know the enemy we face doesn’t follow the Geneva Convention or any law that pertains to war, so does that mean we shouldn’t also follow the Geneva Convention also, which prohibits torture? Of course not, because we want to be example for the world. Republicans argue that we have to do whatever is necessary to keep Americans safe, and Democrats argue it goes against our values and makes us look bad. We as Americans, as leader of the free world we

    Read More

  • Inhuman Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

    1550 Words  | 4 Pages

    The techniques used by the CIA and military in the wake of 2001 involved stress positions, strikes, sensory and sleep deprivation. These Enhanced Interrogation Techniques have been compared to torture and torture lite. While strikes, stress positions, and deprivation leave no lasting marks, they were found to constitute "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" in an investigation conducted by John Helgerson the Inspector General for the CIA (Jehl 2005).

    Read More

  • The Torture Myth, by Anne Applebaum

    897 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “The Torture Myth,” Anne Applebaum explores the controversial topic of torture practices, focused primarily in The United States. The article was published on January 12, 2005, inspired by the dramatic increase of tensions between terrorist organizations and The United States. Applebaum explores three equality titillating concepts within the article. Applebaum's questions the actual effectiveness of using torture as a means of obtaining valuable information in urgent times. Applebaum explores the ways in which she feels that the United States’ torture policy ultimately produces negative effects upon the country. Applebaum's final question is if torture is not optimally successful, why so much of society believes it works efficiently.

    Read More

  • Essay On Does Torture Violate Human Rights

    1753 Words  | 4 Pages

    In discussion of torture, one controversial issue has been whether torture is effective and if it violates the human rights. On the one hand, some argue that torture is effective. Others even maintain that torture does not violate human rights. I disagree with allowing torture because in my view, torture is not effective, it violates the human rights, and undermines the effectiveness of interrogation methods.

    Read More

  • Pouring Salt on the Wound

    1326 Words  | 3 Pages

    America’s Use of Torture in Interrogations of Suspected Terrorists Violates Human Rights by Lisa Hajjar

    Read More

  • Moral Justifications for Torture

    1952 Words  | 4 Pages

    Within this paper I will argue that torture can be morally justified in some extreme emergencies. However, I will also analyse the reasons and arguments for the support of the prohibition of torture and the implications of this. However, notwithstanding my argument on the validity of the use of torture in certain circumstances, torture ought not be institutionalised or legalised in any way whatsoever. I will justify my argument through two case studies as well as the “ticking bomb” scenario by discussing the mitigating factors it possess and why torture is crucial in the potential to obtain life altering information.

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Torture

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    The use of torture has always been a hot topic of moral and ethical discussion. Typically, the discussion is not about whether or not torture is good, but rather if there is ever a morally acceptable situation in which torture should be allowed to occur. Does a criminal’s deeds strip him of basic human rights and make it morally okay for him to be physically and mentally abused? Do certain situations such as war make torture acceptable? It is generally agreed upon that torture is a terrible violation of a person and their rights; the common thread among moral questions such as these is if there are any times when torture could be considered morally acceptable. In order to analyze this moral dilemma, an ethical system is commonly used as a

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment and Torture

    2197 Words  | 5 Pages

    Cesare Beccaria discusses the issue of torture in his work An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. He states that either a crime is certain or uncertain, and in either circumstance, torture is not a legitimate punishment (Beccaria 530). When a crime has certainly been committed and already has a punishment assigned to it by law, it is useless to torture because you do not need to torture the convicted person to get a confession. If the proof is insufficient to convict the person in question of committing the crime, “it is wrong to torture an innocent person, such as the law adjudges him to be, whose crimes are not yet proved” (Beccaria 530). Torture, therefore, is not acceptable in any case of punishment and should not be used.

    Read More

  • Why Is Torture Wrong

    1595 Words  | 4 Pages

    In recent discussions on torture, a disputable issue has been whether torture is wrong. On one side of the argument, some people claim that torture is wrong in all situations no matter the circumstance. From this point of view, many people such as Philip B. Heymann believe that “the overall, longer-term cost of any system authorizing torture, openly or tacitly, would far outweigh its occasional, short term benefits” (536). Basically, the major long lasting effects that are a result of using torture are more drastic than the positive effects that are only interim. From a conflicting position, people are okay with torture being used in the means if innocent people are at risk. In the words of Michael Levin “there are situations in which torture is not

    Read More

  • Difference Between Terrorism And The Criminal Justice Model

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Torture is a gruesome act, with the main goal of inflicting utmost pain on a person, usually as a punishment or to force the recipient to divulge vital information. Most people who criticize torture point out that it is a gruesome thing to do, notwithstanding who the victim is. Hence, a state or an individual do not have the right to deliberately hurt another human being. As this

    Read More

  • The Convention Against Torture

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the convention against torture, has brought many people together, and has informed many people of the horrible tortures which go on everywhere from the US to Syria. It has tried to set fine lines which prohibit torture under all circumstances. However, since there is no governing body over countries, it remains difficult to enforce the human right standards sought after by the Convention against torture. The convention has therefore done a good job at identifying the torturers. This has in turn lessened the amount of those persecuted. It will remain a gradual process to eliminate torture from all countries, but nevertheless a necessity, in the quest for universal human rights. Torture will continue until all countries decide for themselves, and not from a third party convention that freedom from torture is a human right everyone deserves.

    Read More

  • Is Torture Ever Acceptable?

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    From a moral standpoint, torture is wrong and unacceptable. Many religious people are against this act of violence because they see it as a violation of the dignity of a human being. Humans have the right to not have intentional harm upon themselves from others. The ban on torture furthermore supports this certain right. Not only does torture violate people’s rights, but they also violate the demands of justice. In the past, many of our nation’s people have been tortured and we have had a problem with it; but when it’s not you the one that is being tortured, it seems to be fine. Have you heard of the golden rule, “Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation? (7)” This applies very well to this problem.

    Read More

More about Human Torture Should Not be Continued

Open Document