Human Resource Case Study

713 Words2 Pages

Based on your experience, to what extent do you agree or disagree with Hammonds’ arguments and why? Human resources is suppose to mange human skill and talent and they are supposed to make sure that organizational goal are met, that is the purpose they serve (Youssef-Morgan & Stark. 2014). I would agree that human resources need to stay an important function is a company. I worked at a few companies that were totally ran by human resources departments and some of them, they simply did not care about the employees at all . Not to mention that human resources generally does not have any real power to do anything of substance anyways. I would say they article is completely right about its opinion of the current states of human resources. Human resources is relay less about developing good workers and doing what is in the best interest of the company that is the bottom line. I agree with Hammonds …show more content…

That also may be a training opportunity for many HR professionals to understand their core functions while not causing the employees to feel so disconnected, nowmany of us expressed different opinions HR has a public relations problem. It is a bit ironic that many HR experts are asked to perform certain PR roles. As stated by our weekly lecture lecture Mote, D. (2014), “HR teams play an important role in leading and promoting collaboration amongst their teams, this includes ensuring their companies are set up for success operating at a global level and facing multiple challenges in the world of ever-changing, and at times volatile, business environment” (Mote, 2011, para.9). Nowadays, HRM encompasses, “planning, implementing, and managing recruitment, as well as selection, training, career, and organizational development initiatives within an organization” (Mote, 2011). HR must find the right people for the job form THE Start resources has actually been diluted over the

Open Document