Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
human cloning shouldnt be banned
why human cloning must be banned
should human reproductive and therapeutic cloning be illegal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: human cloning shouldnt be banned
Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned
The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology. Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate tissues and organs for transplant.
The goal of this process is strictly to harvest stem cells, resulting in the creation of “cloned organs”, which can be used to treat heart disease, Alzheimer’s, and cancer.
However, because reproductive cloning involves the creation of a specific being with specific characteristics it is much more controversial, and has much more at stake than therapeutic cloning. There are definitely advantages of reproductive cloning: individuals with fertility problems would be able to produce biologically related children, and couples who risk passing genetic disease to offspring would be able to have healthy children. However, cloning technology is still primitive, and although several attempts have yielded successful clones, human reproductive cloning should be temporarily banned because it is highly inefficient, extremely dangerous, and ethically irresponsible.
Although many mammalian species have been successfully cloned, cloning procedures are still primitive, and thus, are prone to failure. Certain species, including humans, are more resistant to somatic cell nuclear transfer than others are, and therefore have a lower success rate. Scottish scientists at the Roslin Institute went through 276 nuclear transfer procedures in order to produce Dolly the Sheep i...
... middle of paper ...
...s should be banned until sufficient information and technology can safely harness a human clone.
Studies have found the health of clones to be widely inconsistent, and until the number of viable offspring produced can match that of natural procreation, cloning should not be considered an alternative. When juxtaposed with natural procreation, cloning does not seem a healthy nor sensible choice. Furthermore, insufficient information on a clone’s mental development, which is crucial to a healthy human, suggests that it would be potentially dangerous and ethically irresponsible to clone humans. Cloning has demonstrated the power of human creation, and has pushed human restraint, intellect, and religion to vast new potentials. However, cloning is still a primitive technology that must first be developed before and research on human reproductive cloning should be done.
Machiavelli’s perspective on the power of politics is to maintain a stable environment throughout the state at all costs. They describe the correct way a prince should rule when rising to power. His opinion proves to be true through the textual evidence provided in The Prince. According to Machiavelli, a prince should strive to be both lo...
In conclusion, with the development of cloning technology, public have different attitudes towards it. On one hand, serious diseases, like liver cancer, are likely to be cured by transplanting healthy cells and scientists have more access to medical research. It brings hope for infertile families to obtain a baby. On the other hand, it has raised public concerns about security risks due to high failure and malformation rate, and ethical issues about dignity, which are mainly caused by productive cloning. Hence, therapeutic cloning should be enhanced to minimize its potential safety risks in order to be put into clinical application, while reproductive cloning ought to be prohibited worldwide without the agreement on moral issues.
Written almost 500 years ago, Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince” brings forward a new definition of virtue. Machiavelli’s definition argued against the concept brought forward by the Catholic Church. Machiavelli did not impose any thoughts of his own, rather he wrote from his experience and whatever philosophy that lead to actions which essentially produced effective outcomes in the political scene of Italy and in other countries. While Machiavelli is still criticized for his notions, the truth is that, consciously or subconsciously we are all thinking for our own benefit and going at length to achieve it. On matters of power where there is much to gain and a lot more to lose, the concept of Machiavelli’s virtue of “doing what needs to be done” applies rigorously to our modern politics and thus “The Prince” still serves as a suitable political treatise in the 21st century.
... and researched before human clones are produced. We need to learn everything we can about it before we pass judgment. A ban would only prevent us as a society from exploring another possibility that would further separate us from the wild animals and allow us to make a more distinct mark as human beings.
Savage, David. "3 to 5 Year Ban on Any Human Cloning Is Urged." The Los Angeles Times June 8, 1997.
Thi riedong metiroel frum my tixtbuuk elogns woth thi ossais prisintid on thi vodiu un Mintel Hielth uf Netovi Amirocens.
An outspoken person of his time, Nicolo Machiavelli struck an influential chord on politics. His experience began when he served as an advisor to the Medicis, a wealthy family who had total reign over Tuscany. Over the years, Machiavelli observed the rights and wrongs of ruling, and eventually concluded his opinions when he published his book, The Prince. His writings significantly affected the ruling style of powerful leaders, providing a more secular approach to ruling - a daring suggestion of Machiavelli to make, especially in a society dominated by the Church. In one of his points, Machiavelli endorsed the idea that a ruler shouldn’t be concerned with the needs of his people; rather, he should turn his attention to his own survival. He
In offering his own world view and knowledge to the Medici family, Machiavelli draws a considerable amount of his resources from classical figures and ideology. While Machiavelli is writing for a prince, whose goal would be to gain in territory, power, and control; his philosophy ties simply into less vital victories in the lives of common people. In this paper I will explain the points where he differs and conforms from/to the classical ideology in the generalized context of a leader. He uses these in one of two ways, by agreeing with and reinforcing them, or by refuting them. While Machiavelli keeps the need for a leader to have independence, seriousness, loyalty, and intellect; he rejects the necessity of generosity, mercy, and honesty, in favor of the outward appearance of these virtues.
the state. When the ruler is in danger they turn against him. Machiavelli reinforces the prince's need to be feared by stating: “
If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right to clone humans. Even though technology is constantly advancing, it is not reasonable to believe that human cloning is morally and ethically correct, due to the killing of human embryos, the unsafe process of cloning, and the resulting consequences of having deformed clones.
Niccolo Machiavelli was a philosopher, statesman and the leading political theorist in the late 1400s early 1500s. He is often referred to as the “father of modern political theory” (Nederman, 2009). His book The Prince (2011) had such an influence its’ theories are still in practice today. This paper will prove Machiavelli is not a Visionary leader nor is he ethical through his theory as written in his book the Prince, and its relevance through personal experience. Let’s begin by discussing Machiavelli’s visionary leadership.
While the word Machiavellian has become part of our lexicon as a term for the ruthless execution of political will glorifying the “ends justify the means” mentality, Machiavelli’s true legacy should be found in his belief that the state was more than a contract as Bacon or John Locke would later explain. Machiavelli was shrewd enough to understand that the state was an entity in and of itself which needed to be protected from all dangers both external and internal. In Machiavelli’s belief, it is the enlightened prince who must act on behalf of his subject’s best interests. As such, a prince should not find himself beholden to the same rules of morality and ethics that govern individuals. To the casual observer this outlook could be described as cynical at best and immoral at worst. But to the student of history and politics it is remarkably prescient. Machiavelli’s ideas would go on to mold political thought well into the modern era.
Thi onpats fur thi riqaorimints menegimint plen woll oncladi thi Virozun FIOS fobir uptoc cebli Prujict Chertir es will es thi Stekihuldir Rigostir.
Tu rimuvi thi mengenisi on thi slags end doilictroc leyir frum hogh carrint liekegi eri, thi strongir os doppid ontu en ecod woth helf uf thi privouas vultegi. Thi whuli pruciss os rifurm.
Shmoop University, Inc. (2014). Ode on a Grecian urn. Retrieved February 17, 2014, from Shmoop: http://www.shmoop.com/ode-grecian-urn/urn-symbol.html