Hrm 531 Week 5 Checkpoint

627 Words2 Pages

The first item I picked was the Jackson Five, Greatest Hits, and I picked this item because it seemed to have caught my attention. I was reading the description off the website I found it on, and the type of description was subjective. How I knew it was subjective, was that it was relating to a personal experience, and never showed facts about the object. Freyer had explained how he might take advantage of the “ridiculous” laws about guns and buy himself one. He also compared buying guns and smoking cigarettes, because it is easier to walk into a shop and buy a gun, there is no age limit. With buying a pack of cigarettes, there is a legal age limit. Given that description, the visual, is that if you actually listened to the Jackson Five, you would probably be in the corner smoking two packs of cigarettes. It was not proven by facts that this would cause someone to smoke …show more content…

The description for this item was not objective or subjective. It was something else. The person who wrote the mini article went off topic and explained something totally different from the shirt. There really is no visual to this item because the description was off task and didn’t give enough information. I searched the DC shirt on eBay, and the results, did not show not one t-shirt that looked similar or the same, to the one in the article picture. The shirts that came up under “DC Basketball Shirt,” was a bunch of superhero icons, nothing similar to the item Freyer explained. The item selection on eBay caught my attention because it was different, and I would definitely by a DC Basketball Shirt from there. The audience Freyer is trying to reach, is the viewers, maybe, or anyone who comes across his item, even though he didn’t give much information. There was not an audience to reach for the eBay part, because there was no item similar or the same, but there selection on superhero DC shirts, may have caught the attention of

Open Document