How the Misuse of Norm-Referenced Tests can Impact the Assessment and Treatment of a Client
718 Words3 Pages
In this article, the authors discuss how the misuse of norm-referenced tests can impact the assessment and treatment of a client. Norm-referenced tests provide a comparison between the skills and behaviors assessed of a client to the relevant norms of a similar age group. According to the article, a clinician must ensure to properly use a norm-referenced test in order to provide evidence as to whether a client may need more assessments or whether a certain treatment approach is more beneficial to the client. However, the misuse of a norm-referenced test may also negatively impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment approach. In this article, the authors describe four common errors that arise when misusing a norm-referenced test.
As previously mentioned, norm-referenced tests are used as a comparison in order to evaluate the client’s scores. However, the authors discuss that norm referenced tests are not truly reliable as comparisons are based on estimates and no two similar individuals will perform in an identical matter on a given task. This leads to the question of how much of a difference should there be between a client and similar individuals in their age group before the differences are indicative of an underlying problem? The use of reliability may assist clinicians in determining this issue. The authors describe that depending on how high or low the tests reliability is, is an indication of whether there is little difference or inconsistencies between the client’s ideal score, also known as their true score, and their observed score.
Due to the issue that norm-referenced tests are based on estimates, a test’s reliability may cause doubt for a clinician to interpret a client’s test score results. Therefore, the ...
... middle of paper ...
...nt scores is less reliable for individuals who are more advanced developmentally as their age-equivalent score is not equally matched to their individual’s chronological age. The second psychometric problem is that age-equivalent scores do not truly represent the population of specific ages of children. Instead, age-equivalent scores are computed or estimated in two ways. The first way age-equivalent scores are estimated is between a fixed set of ages, and the second way is estimating a score between older and younger individuals. The authors believe that the way these age-equivalent scores are computed suggest that it is a less reliable method in making a prediction about the behavior of and language of a child. Furthermore, the article continues to discuss that age-equivalent scores can often lead to misleading information and inferences made towards a client.