preview

How the Earl Warren Court Liberalized America

analytical Essay
834 words
834 words
bookmark

The Warren Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969, when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice. Warren led a liberal majority that used judicial power in dramatic fashion, to the consternation of conservative opponents. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways. One way the Warren Court liberalized America, is through the court cases of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), where these court cases helped define Due Process and the rights of defendants. Another way the Warren Court liberalized America, is through the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines ISD (1969), Engle v. Vitale (1962), and New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), where the Supreme Court sought to expand the scope of application of the First Amendment, however also limiting those freedoms as well. Lastly, the third way the Warren Court liberalized America, is through the issues of the right to privacy, Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the incorporation of the exclusionary rule, Mapp v. Ohio (1961), and lastly the banning of segregation in public schools, Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The cases of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966), all helped define Due Process and the rights of defendants. In the court case of Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that if the defendant can not afford an attorney, then one will be provided for them. Also, under the Supreme Court’s ruling of the case of Miranda v. Arizona, meaning that when arrested, your basic rights must be stated, that you have the right to remain silent and that anything you say can and will be used in co... ... middle of paper ... ...r the court case of Mapp v. Ohio. The Warren Court liberalized America in many ways, what with the cases of Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Escobedo v. Illinois, where the Supreme Court helped to define Due Process and the defendants’ rights. Also the issues of the rights or freedoms listed in the 1st Amendment helped the Warren Court liberalize America, since each case focused on a certain freedom, Tinker v. Des Moines ISD (freedom of speech), New York Times v. Sullivan (freedom of the press), and also the limitation of the freedom of religion under the court case of Engle v. Vitale. Lastly, the Warren Court liberalized America, since it helped change so much, with the cases of Brown v. Board of Education (segregation of public schools), Griswold v. Connecticut (right to privacy), and finally Mapp v. Ohio (the incorporation of the exclusionary rule).

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the supreme court ruled that prayers in schools were considered unconstitutional, leading to a ban of all prayers led by teachers in school.
  • Analyzes how the warren court liberalized america by focusing on the right to privacy, the exclusionary rule, and the segregation of public schools.
  • Explains that the warren court liberalized america in many ways, with the cases of miranda v. arizona, gideon and wainwright, and the 1st amendment.
  • Explains that the warren court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.

Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!

    Get Access