How is act three of ‘The Crucible’ dramatically effective?

1158 Words3 Pages

It is 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts; the court is now in session. As demanded by John Proctor to tell the truth, Mary Warren stands in the spotlight to testify about the witchcraft activities she and other girls have been accused of committing. With Mary stating that they were only “pretending”, Abigail Williams denies this testimony, suddenly accusing Mary of bewitching her and the girls. In sheer desperation, John Proctor is forced to confess about his own sin of “lechery” in order to reveal Abigail’s true identity and intentions. The high court discovers the sexual relationship between John and Abigail during the time she worked for his household and how Elizabeth Proctor, after having discovered the relationship at the time, fired Abigail. With neither Abigail’s acceptance nor denial of this assertion, Danforth decides to involve Elizabeth Proctor, whom of which has been reputed by her husband as an “honest woman”. As Elizabeth enters the sudden hollowness of the courtroom, intensity begins and to complicate matters even more, Danforth cuts all sense of communication between the trio of Elizabeth, John and Abigail. He begins his interrogation asking the question, “For what cause did you dismiss her?” putting Elizabeth in a position where she either has to reveal her husband or protect his name, not knowing that this denounces John as a liar. She chooses to lie and is immediately removed by Marshal Herrick, just after hearing from her husband that he had already confessed. Danforth remains oblivious to Abigail’s dark sin, whose attention returns to the person who has betrayed her. Again, Mary Warren receives the limelight after being falsely accused of sending her spirit upon Abigail and the girls. The court becomes a commotion,...

... middle of paper ...

...ad to avoid making close relationships to known communists. On the other hand instead of death as a punishment for crime, America blacklisted (prevented from getting jobs) or imprisoned those who refused to appear in trials or those who were determined communists. Behind it all was Senator Joe McCarthy, thus the name McCarthyism. McCarthy capitalized these concerns, becoming the standing figure for the anti-communist movement, aiming to hunt down the people he assumed to be infiltrators. In addition to his accusations, he also targeted writers and entertainers, whom he thought sympathized with the communists. Arthur Miller was one of the many questioned writers. His play, ‘The Crucible’, was a metaphor for McCarthyism, which therefore caught attention of both the public and the government, who questioned him on whether he has had any connection with communists.

Open Document