Ethics means doing what one believes is the right and best choice for them and what is right to me might not be right to others. Virtues, responsibilities, obligations, and believes all contribute to how people see and analyze things. We are all diverse in how we see and comprehend situations and how we feel about each situation will change how we reason our actions. So should ethics be base on reasons or feelings? I believe that it should be the base on both.
Likewise, such ideas explain why there is such a variety of moral systems in use today and a marked difference in the level of commitment to a personal moral code. Ethics and ethical language, the study of which 'Meta-Ethics' is part, can be split into three distinct branches: descriptive, normative and meta-ethical. On the one hand, descriptive ethics describes the way we live and the moral choices we happen to make. On the other, normative ethics employs the kind of language which is more openly moral and presents a clearer idea about what is held to be right or wrong; so, a statement such as "It is always wrong to tell a lie" is a normative statement. Contrastingly to both, meta-ethics is the study of the meaning of ethics itself, gauging the meaning of ethical language, and taking into consideration the authority of moral claims and the effects of personal preference.
Throughout the ages, philosophers across land and time have argued various perspectives describing their opinions on subjects such as virtue, duties and moral conceptions with great detail. The unfortunate case that has arisen throughout time is determining what code, belief, religion, faith, etc. has truly defined the best set of moral laws to abide by for the greater good of humanity. Even that conquest alone many would argue is unethical in the nature that it follows a utilitarian sense of direction and at what cost must be paid for the greater good. These topics will leave anyone debating the idea as to whether a solid and surefire solution can be created in order to ensure the well-being of a certain population.
Decision-making involves a systematic process of evaluating benefits, losses, and facts. However, the process of decision making becomes more complex as people 's personal, cultural, and organizational values influence the choices they make. Incompatible values, on personal or professional levels, will result in conflict and ethical dilemmas. Ethical decisions can be consistently be made by aligning the facts with values and selecting the action that are best in line with personal cultural preferences,values with those of the organization 's values and objectives. Developing awareness of these values and how they play a role in the decision making process will ultimately mitigate or prevent ethical
Therefore, you are acting ethically. Although, if your action consists without a universal maxim, then your actions are not ethically correct. The reason behind this due to that practical reason has a value. However, people who disagree with the Categorical Imperative and the three basic forms. Harrison claims that these people are, “following Utilitarianism instead, which follows consequentialism”.
That is a hard question, and part of it is deciding whether or not behavior is ethical, and determining what is right or wrong. (Values and Ethics, National Defense University). “Ethics are the principals by which people distinguish what is morally right”. (Certo, 2010, p .98). Ethics are about making choices that may not always feel good or seem like they benefit you but are the right choices to make.
The text defines ethical dilemma as situations that have two or more values in conflict (Woodside & McClam, 2015). As a human service professional, there may be times when situations may emerge and an individual might be uncertain of the proper action to take. A human service professional must look at all points of view. In addition, they must establish a list of problems and examine the multiple viewpoints. Furthermore, they must develop potential outcomes and analyze the impact each decision may have.
What is ethics one may ask, well according to the oxford online dictionary ethics is moral principles that govern a person 's behavior or the conducting of an activity. That is what a person may view as right or wrong and good or bad. Ethics is very important in one’s society and each society as its own moral and principles governing certain issues and religion and philosophical ethics is no different. For centuries religion and religious principles has been criticized by different denominations across the world. Today I am going to speak on some moral principles of religion ethics whether they are absolute or relative to philosophical ethics, I will also be comparing religion ethics and philosophical ethics and last but not least I will speak
Each theory places emphasis on a different aspect of an issue; the emphasis is dependent on which theory is applied, and is placed on one of the following: consequences, actions, and actors. In addition, because each theory has a different focus, different facets of morality must be applied for each theory; those being values, norms, and virtues. Values are “lasting convictions or matters that people feel should be strived for in general,” and are often formed through a person’s upbringing and experiences (Poel and Royakkers 72). Norms are “rules and agreements about how people are supposed to treat each other,” and typically are formed based on specific values (Poel and Royakkers 74). Virtues are parts of a person’s character that are “manifested in how that person acts toward himself/herself and others,” and can be described as a “mean between two extremes” (Rahmoeller 32).
I’ve chosen to discuss the implications of an individual’s, including that of my own, sense of personal values and ethics and how they are incorporated into our relationships both personally and abroad. One’s sense of ethics and values can vary greatly from person to person. It is in this, that relationship values can also differ to different degrees. What one person may think of as an important standard of life and humane guideline may not necessarily be a quality another reflects in and of their own viewpoint. It is through this that conflicts can arise, general disagreements or perhaps even that of string support.