The criminal who commited the crime in almost all cases had to commit first degree murder, which includes some planning of the act. To plan an act of murder and taking someone’s life is beyond emotion, it is psychological and takes some rationalization. If no rationalization takes place, then it can happen again. Another reason that pro-capital punishment argument is that there are innocent men and women sitting on death row that shouldn’t be sentenced to death. Most death row inmates, unless they commit a serious multiple murder have been in and out of jail most of their life.
Generally, crimes are considered the biggest problems in our daily life. All classes of people make crimes but non of them has the right to do this. Crime is a bad phenomena that appeared in all ages and till now. The punishments on these crimes are each according to its crime, in a way that makes criminals think carefully before doing crimes as they are afraid of the punishment. So, each crime has a punishment.
Jodi Arias Should Receive the Death Penalty Jodi Arias should receive the death penalty for violently murdering Travis Alexander. Arias planned on murdering Alexander when she traveled to Arizona. Arias brutally murdered a man who did not want to be in a relationship with her and then Arias lied about it. Alexander’s family and friends would like to see her receive the death penalty. Arias also said she would like the death penalty in an interview.
How did defending herself against a criminal, cause the government 's view of her to go from the victim to the criminal overnight? “A number of other factors are at play, including a 1995 Criminal Code amendment that calls for a minimum four-year sentence when a firearm is used to commit a crime” (Tremblay). Women tend to kill with firearms because they do not normally have the strength, as men, to kill with fists and knives. Out of this act of not having the strength, as their abusers do, they are punished. This
What I mean by that statement is the convicted inmate murder, kills, and or torture multiple victims, then he/she is caught by the hands of justice and we want to give them the death penalty based upon their records. Now is that justice or us just wanting to crucially punish someone. The death penalty is sometimes a hard subject to talk about, because it is such a touchy subject. So I do support the death penalty, but when it all comes down to it how many people are we really saving if we take one man off of earth versus 50,000 more killers, rapist, and child molesters. No one excepts to be those things when they grow up in life some people do want to live different paths in life but some just do not chose the right
She said alexander tried to attack her in self-defense but she quickly stabbed him. My personal view on this population is that the inmate serving life in prison shouldn’t have too many special services, especially to those who murder. The offender murdered someone and they should pay for that. Most of the inmates serving life without parole didn’t murder, some robbed, and some sexually assaulted other people. Inmates serving life for robbing should be treated better than the ones who murdered or the one who raped someone.
The death penalty was used frequently during the medieval times in Roman Britain to discourage the people from committing any types of crimes. Criminals were sentenced to death for committing a range of crimes, the most common being felonies including theft and murder. They were often put to death using a range of resources such as being hanged or beheaded. The criminals were punished so harshly to deter the people from committing any further crimes. Source 1 portrays a woman being beheaded, this could be because she stole something worth more than two days wages or has committed a murder.
Too many people get to live a full functioning life in prison even after committing heinous crimes. Meanwhile, the families of the victims are left with grievance and despair. If the criminal was callous and malicious enough to carry out the plan to murder someone then they should be ready to face their consequences. If the death penalty were used more frequently, it would deter most criminals from committing these crimes. If life in prison was no longer and option for premeditated murder, but only the death penalty was used, there would be a steady decrease in the amount of murders nationwide.
In fact criminals who are shamed in the public will probably commit more crimes now that they are labeled as criminals. That is how society works today, people are labeled for what they have done. No matter how hard one tries to become a better person or what one does to redeem himself, he will still be what society labels him as. So if a person were to be labeled a criminal he would only commit more crimes because that is what society expects of hi... ... middle of paper ... ... service that relates to the crime they committed. She gives examples such as a drunk driver being sentenced to help with road accidents to have them see what really happens that they do not know about.
The Death Penalty. Immoral or moral; just or unjust? These are just a few of the questions people ask themselves when debating the Death Penalty which is arguably the most controversial topic of the United States today. Every time these words come up, we start yelling out our opinions on what we feel is right. Pro death penalty people shout deterrence across the room while the anti death penalty supporters shout about potentially killing an innocent man; some argue that is just and the murders deserve their punishment while others say we are murdering people too if we kill the suspect.