Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
zero tolerance policy in american schools
zero tolerance policy in american schools
zero tolerance policy in american schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: zero tolerance policy in american schools
Before a change in the school system can occur and be effective , everybody involves must be ready to embrace it . Much emphasis , both theoretical and empirical has been placed on school discipline reform from outside through different government policies and educational laws but little has been said on how the school (The implementer ) can be shaped and reform from within , by focusing on the school-based restorative approach . The above introduction shows how schools are getting it wrong on school discipline , policy and educational laws which later have an adverse effect on the society (family and the community ) who are the agent of child development and socialization . John Dewey said , " Education is the process of learning to be a useful …show more content…
If restorative practice is being practice during my junior high school days , there could have been an opportunity for us to participate in a circle and the harm could have been repaired and the other four students who ended their educational career in the street could have been restored back to the classroom . Braithwaite , (2004 ) in his definition of restorative justice said ; is the " idea that because crime hurt , restorative justice should heal " . The question now is . How many schools are using restorative justice to heal the crime or offences committed by the student ? The answer is unknown . Restorative justice is not an alternative to zero tolerance , not a substitution for school discipline , neither a way to control student behaviour , nor a school package program . It is a philosophical approach that honours the worth of all regardless of they are and what they do …show more content…
" Schools with high suspension rates are less safe , less equitable , and have lower academic outcomes (UCLA Civil Rights project ) " . Haven 't said all the above analogy and the conviction of restorative approach that came upon me , I can now give a straight answer that restorative practice in school can make a difference only if the governments are ready to support it and the schools are willing to accept the practice in full scale . I don 't see restorative justice as a course anymore but rather as a human in me because it has changed my thinking , addresses , decision and judgement about issues . It also strengthens how I relate to my family and people around me . The recently misunderstanding between me and my fiancée and how I handled the situation shows my deep understanding about the course by asking her some of the restorative framework questions and she said : " I never believed we could settle our difference between / in this short periods "
Restorative justice is defined as “using humanistic, no punitive strategies to right wrongs and restore social harmony” (Siegel, 2008, p. 189). Instead of imposing harsh penalties on offenders like long prison sentences or even the death penalty, restorative justice calls for a more rehabilitative approach, such as reconciliation and offender assistance.
The Youth Criminal Justice Act has many concerns creating inequalities in the restorative justice approach. For instance, juvenile delinquents who develop from a background that is impoverished may lack the ability to satisfy the reparative objectives of punishment and may not be ready to be reintegrated back into socie...
Restorative Justice is a new way of thinking about and responding to crime, especially in relation to youth offending. For the past decade, especially, there has been an increasing interest in new approaches towards criminal justice in general but more so in terms of juvenile delinquency and finding an appropriate form of punishment to escape the labelling of youth delinquency, which involve the community and focus much more on the victim.
Sharon Lewis, Improving School Climate: Findings from Schools Implementing Restorative Practices, (Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices, 2009).
Implementing Restorative Practices in School, explains what has to happen in a school in order to become restorative. The book is divided up into three sections. The first section explains the prospective gains of restorative practice in schools, recounting encouraging results for students and teachers. Section two studies the process of understanding and dealing with change, providing practical guidance on the emotional barricades that may be encountered along the process. To end with, sectio...
...ere is to teach and make the students respectful. Jordan, in the article, "I wants to go to the prose", Jordan says, "The function of schools, their first and primary obligation, is not to probe tender psyches, to feed and clothe the homeless, nor to be the papa and mama a kid never had. The job is to teach" (1995, p.2). In other words, the schools are made for the students to learn and gain knowledge, not for solving their problems. Hence they should be treated by the students and the teachers the same way. What schools can add up in a psychiatrist ward in the hospitals. There the psychiatrist can help the students in their social problems. This, in my opinion, will be the best solution for the people who oppose my ideas and this would make the life and job of a teacher much easier and momentous.
The concept of restorative justice became a game-changer in juvenile justice system. Through the course of time, professionals explored every possible methods and approaches that could positively affect the children without the expense of harming their future and wellbeing. The idea of restorative justice is “administer justice that focuses or repairing the harm done to the victim and the community. (Save the Children-UK, 2005)” The four guiding principles are to: (1) Repair and restore the balance within the community. (2) restitution for the victim. (3) Ensure that the offender understand and take responsibility. (4) Help the offender to change and improve. In South Africa, this is practiced in their community throughout
Over the years, the traditional criminal justice system has emphasized offenders’ accountability through punishment and stigmatization. The emphasis on the retributive philosophy made it challenging for the system to meaningfully assist and empower crime victims. In the criminal justice system, victims often face insensitive treatment with little or no opportunity for input into the perseverance of their case and report feeling voiceless in the process used (Choi, Gilbert, & Green, 2013:114). Crime Victims, advocates, and practitioners have called for an expansion of victims’ rights and community-based alternatives rather than punishment-orientated justice policies. What victims want from the criminal justice system is a less formal process, more information about case processing, respectful treatment, and emotional restoration. Therefore, there is a growing need to progress towards the restorative justice (RJ) system.
Agreeing on a definition of restorative justice has proved difficult. One definition is a theory of justice that focuses mostly on repairing the harm caused by criminal behaviour. The reparation is done through a cooperative process that includes all the stakeholders. Restorative justice can also be explained as an approach of justice that aims to satisfy the needs of the victims and offenders, as well as the entire community. The most broadly accepted definition for restorative justice, however, is a process whereby all the parties that have a stake in a specific offence collectively resolve on how to deal with the aftermath. This process is largely focused around reparation, reintegration and participation of victims. That is to say, it is a victim-centred approach to criminal justice, and it perceives crime differently than the adversarial system of justice.
...apabilities to deal with this which is not the case so much nowadays as Tony Marshall (1999) argues. There are criticisms over procedures, loss of rights such as an independent and impartial forum as well as the principle of proportionality in sentencing. There is also an unrealistic expectation that restorative justice can produce major changes in deviant behaviour, as there is not enough evidence to support this claim (Cunneen, 2007). Levrant et al (1999) on the other hand suggests that restorative justice still remains unproven in its’ effectiveness to stop reoffending and argues that its appeal lies in its apparent morality and humanistic sentiments rather than its empirical effectiveness. He continues to argue that it allows people to feel better within themselves through having the moral high ground rather than focusing on providing justice to the offender.
When Mary Catherine Parris was told that I would be talking to her about restorative justice, her response was, “Is that a real thing?” (personal communication, September 23, 2015). Through this assignment I realized that restorative justice is not talked about within the criminal justice system. For both of the individuals I spoke with, the idea of restorative justice seemed like a joke. In trying to persuade them both that restorative justice is a real thing, I was met with very similar beliefs and comments from both individuals. They both believed that restorative justice would not work and believed that some aspects of the approach were completely useless (M. C. Parris, & R. Clemones, personal communication, September 23, 2015). The responses
“Restorative justice is an approach to crime and other wrongdoings that focuses on repairing harm and encouraging responsibility and involvement of the parties impacted by the wrong.” This quote comes from a leading restorative justice scholar named Howard Zehr. The process of restorative justice necessitates a shift in responsibility for addressing crime. In a restorative justice process, the citizens who have been affected by a crime must take an active role in addressing that crime. Although law professionals may have secondary roles in facilitating the restorative justice process, it is the citizens who must take up the majority of the responsibility in healing the pains caused by crime. Restorative justice is a very broad subject and has many other topics inside of it. The main goal of the restorative justice system is to focus on the needs of the victims, the offenders, and the community, and focus
As the purpose of restorative justice is to mend the very relationship between the victim, offender, and society, communities that embrace restorative justice foster an awareness on how the act has harmed others. Braithwaite (1989) notes that by rejecting only the criminal act and not the offender, restorative justice allows for a closer empathetic relationship between the offender, victims, and community. By acknowledging the intrinsic worth of the offender and their ability to contribute back to the community, restorative justice shows how all individuals are capable of being useful despite criminal acts previous. This encourages offenders to safely reintegrate into society, as they are encouraged to rejoin and find rapport with the community through their emotions and
Juvenile delinquency is major issue in the United States. Many studies have focused on trying to find ways to reduce juvenile delinquency. One strategy that has been studied in great depth is deterrence through harsh punishment accompanied by get-tough approaches. Those who support this strategy believe that the fear of punishment or the severity of the punishment will prevent juveniles from engaging in delinquency. Authorities fostered this fear through establishing mandatory minimum sentences, blended sentences and allowing waivers to adult court, to list a few. While these get-tough policies have a significant effect on how juvenile offenders are treated, these policies have little to no effect on future offending. The ineffectiveness of get-tough strategies stem from the fact that the juvenile justice system does not use effective forms of punishment, many juveniles do not respond to punishment in general, and the reasons or causes for delinquency are never addressed. In order to truly reduce juvenile delinquency, punishment must be combined with rehabilitation. Punishment in the form of restorative justice has the most potential for reducing juvenile delinquency. Restorative justice holds the juvenile accountable for their crimes and punishes them in meaningful ways. The punishment given in restorative justice is not focused on how long the sentence is or how severe the punishment is. Instead, restorative justice focuses on punishments that allow the juvenile to repair the harm that they caused, helps the juvenile to restore connections to others, and aims at addressing the cause of the juvenile’s delinquency. By making the offender admit their guilt and having them sit down for a conference with their family, friends, the vi...
One thing that i truly have accomplished during Ms. Lester 's mentoring was the building of said relationships. I 've formed a bond with these students. Ive also provided some assistance that these students otherwise may not of had. The assistance i mean of course is the knowledge of college. The main goal of restorative justice is to return things to how they were before the incident, by providing assistance to these potentially discarded kids, i am hopefully returning them to a similar state to other, more privileged teens their