How Is Shakespeare Different From Today

614 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The influence of Elizabethan age on Shakespearean

Shakespeare's world and ours, what's so different between them? Shakespeare had a very different time then we do today. For example, in his time their sign of wealth was wearing certain clothing, and according to http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~cfinlay/sumptuary.html were just like this. Purple silk and sable fur: Reserved strictly for the Queen, King, and their family members. Velvet: The colors crimson and scarlet being reserved for only the highest nobility: dukes, marquises, and earls. Tinseled cloth: Cloth that was woven with strands of gold and silver, that is, tinsel, was reserved for the nobility including viscounts and barons. Gold, silver, or pearl embroidery: Reserved for dukes, marquises, earls (including the children of all …show more content…

It was crazy how much had change in clothing but what about actors? According to the Utah Shakespeare company, the actors of Shakespeare's time were ridiculed and were very low in that time, they were often arrested and had to go through a lot to make it so that they could make it through a play without it shutting …show more content…

Most of the time all the seats are the same and coast the same price, it's just a matter of who pre ordered what seat first. Even though I have shown so many difference what are the same between these two worlds? Shakespeare's time a third of the population went to his plays. Today that is almost the same a third of the population goes to see a movie each week. Shakespeare's theater was adored and in their time had great acting and affects. Today people go to see movies because of how crazy the effects are and how great at acting or good looking the actors are. Today we have people going around at ball games or football games etc. That will go around selling soda, or hot dogs. Well in Shakespeare's time they had almost the same thing, people would go around selling fruits or nuts. It is crazy that we have changes some things of the past so much, while others we keep almost the same to when it was made. In conclusion Shakespeare's world and ours are very different but also very much

Show More
Related

  • Shakespeare Not Of Age But For All Mankind Summary

    452 Words  | 1 Pages

    A final difference between Shakespeare's world and modern times is you had to present your new play in front of the Queen before you could put it on. IN the essay " Actors in Shakesperare's Day", Stephanie Chidester writes, "If players were to legally retained by novlemen, they had to prove they could act, and one means of demonstraiting their ligitimacy was playing at court for Queen Elizabeth." This illustrates a significant difference because in the modern world if you want to put on a play, you get all the equipment, you don't have to get the Queen's permission.

    Read More

  • Much Ado About Nothing Essay: Beatrice, Benedick, and Love

    892 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare - A Life in Drama.

    Read More

  • King Lear Corruption

    1544 Words  | 4 Pages

    In conclusion, this mid-play excerpt of a character in a Shakespearean play tells the reader much about his current thoughts, as well as exposing a small glimmer of what took place in his past. Though the text is limited, there are enough details and elements to lead the reader to a sensible conclusion of what this character is really

    Read More

  • The World Of Shakespeare In The 1600's And Today

    405 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Shakespearean world of the late 1500's and early 1600's was very, very different from our own. Though there are differences, there are also some similarities. The world of Shakespeare is a unique, and again, is much different than our own.

    Read More

  • Taming Of The Shrew Clothing Essay

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare lived in a society where clothes were key in identifying certain social statuses. Only certain social statuses were able to wear specific colors or fabric. For example, purple silk was only reserved for the Queen, King and their family members, and velvet was reserved for only the highest nobility (Hanson). A person’s appearance affects how others in society view them. Shakespeare shows that clothing does not make a man. Characters in The Taming of the Shrew change their appearances to fit the role they are disguising as. Their change of clothes affected how society looked at them but did not change who they truly were. A servant dressed as a lord is still a servant and a lord dressed as a servant is still a lord no matter their change of clothes and a women is still a women even if she is labeled as a shrew. In the end of the play, they all changed to fit society norms.

    Read More

  • The Roaring Girl

    3981 Words  | 8 Pages

    Howard, Jean. "Cross-dressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern Eng- land." Shakespeare Quarterly 39 (1988): 418-40.

    Read More

  • What Was The Theatre In The Tudor Theatre

    620 Words  | 2 Pages

    However soon afterwards Elizabeth then gave permission for four Noblemen to set up their own acting companies and to employ actors where they would perform plays in the yards of Large Inns. People then began to want to see plays for entertainment and not on a morality basis.

    Read More

  • Does Shakespeare matter?

    437 Words  | 1 Pages

    William Shakespeare has become landmark in English literature. One must be familiar with the early days of English literature in order to comprehend the foundation of much of more modern literature’s basis. Shakespeare’s modern influence is still seen clearly in many ways. The success of Shakespeare’s works helped to set the example for the development of modern dramas and plays. He is also acknowledged for being one of the first writers to use any modern prose in his writings.

    Read More

  • The Upper Class in Shakespeare's Plays

    906 Words  | 2 Pages

    Elizabethan Society had a very strict social code at the time that William Shakespeare was writing his plays. Social class in Elizabethan England could determine many things, from how a person spoke or what they could wear. This led to Shakespeare basing his plays on these social classes, mostly the upper class. Shakespeare used the upper class in a majority of his plays, such as “Shakespeare’s Henry IV.” Shakespeare relied on the innovations of the Renaissance in his plays related to the upper class, because he liked to give his characters more depth and vary the overall rhythmic structure of his plays to make them interesting for the audience.

    Read More

  • Why Do We Read Shakespeare

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    No matter how different we think that we are, as a human race, the feelings that are brought out in Shakespeare's plays bring us together in spirit.

    Read More

  • Role Of Clothes In Twelfth Night

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Catrin Seepo Dr. Cruz-Petersen LIT 4250 5 November 2017 Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night In theaters, clothes are essential elements, which fall under the representational somaesthetics, especially during the Renaissance. In addition, it was popular in that era for actors to switch the gender of the character that they are playing throughout the play.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Character of Life in As You Like It and King Lear

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    Through comedy and tragedy Shakespeare reveals the vast expanses and profound depths of the character of life. For him they are not separate worlds of drama and romance, but poles of a continuum. The distinction between tragedy and comedy is called in question when we turn to Shakespeare. Though the characters differ in stature and power, and the events vary in weight and significance, the movements of life in all Shakespeare's plays are governed by the same universal principles which move events in our own lives. Through myriad images Shakespeare portrays not only the character of man and society but the character of life itself.

    Read More

  • Shakespeare’s Language

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    The impeccable style and craft of Shakespeare’s writing has always been looked upon with great respect, and it continues to serve as an inspiration to writers and thinkers today even as it did when it was being first performed in London. Shakespeare’s modern audience, however, is far less diverse than the one for which he originally wrote. Due to the antiquity of his language, Shakespeare’s modern readership consists mostly of students and intellectuals, whereas in Shakespeare’s own time, his plays were performed in playhouses packed with everyone from royalty to peasants. Because of this, Shakespeare was forced to write on many different levels, the most sophisticated of which appealed to his more elite audience members, while the more straightforward and often more crude of which appealed to his less educated viewers, and the most universal of which still appeals to us.

    Read More

  • Social Status in Shakespeares Plays

    1996 Words  | 4 Pages

    Shakespeare’s theaters were open to all that could afford to come. His plays included every social class in some light. The audience couldn’t help but be drawn into what Shakespeare was saying in his plays because they were all involved in them. The only people that really couldn’t attend his plays were the lowest of laborers and that was because they couldn’t afford it. The variety of people in the audience helped Shakespeare’s plays really take off because of how they spoke to everyone instead of just one class in the social structure. He made fun of the nobility in my eyes, but at the same time I see it as him telling the truth and what we really find funny is is that it really did happen that way

    Read More

  • Blind Trust In Othello Essay

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare critiques

    Read More

More about How Is Shakespeare Different From Today

Open Document