Piaget And Vygotsky Compare And Contrast

723 Words2 Pages

How does knowledge grow? As someone who spends most of their time with children in one capacity to another looking at both these theories in terms of which is more applicable is interesting. To compare Piaget and Vygotsky is like comparing apples to oranges, both have similarities to one another; they were both brilliant people, with brilliant theories on how humans developed; nonetheless, they also cannot completely explain human development with their theories alone.
Jean Piaget (1896 - 1980), was a Swiss psychologist who was the first to make a systematic study of cognitive development. Before Piaget’s work, the common assumption in psychology was that children were merely less capable thinkers than adults. After Piaget’s work it was realized …show more content…

Vygotsky has become the foundation of much research and theory in cognitive development over the past several decades, particularly of what has become known as Social Development Theory (Vygotskian Approach). Vygotsky 's theories stress the essential role of social interaction in the development of cognition as he believed strongly that community plays a central role in the process of "making meaning."( McLeod, …show more content…

Nonetheless, even if it were complete no solitary theory can explain development. Individual development cannot be understood without reference to the social and cultural context within which it is embedded (McLeod, S.). In my opinion they were both correct about their discoveries. I believe human being are born with certain schemes (as Piaget says) but learn through not only adaptation but also from the zone of proximal development; meaning that children seem to learn through two main ways 1) playing and trying new things, and as they do that their schemes develop and 2) as the child grows they have people that help them learn as they surpass each step of their learning. Nevertheless, for the sake of simply choosing one I find more applicable I would have to say that I lean more toward Piaget’s way of thinking. Humans by nature like most animals must be born with natural instincts into reacting certain ways and thus are able to do certain things naturally. A prime example of that is babies, from the time humans are born it seems they have some biological instinct in how to survive. It doesn’t matter if the baby has been alive less than a day they somehow know to find and suckle the mothers breast; as it is babies seem to be biologically programmed to be able to find moms milk. Moving on as the baby gets

Open Document