More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods of critical thinking
Analysis of sherry turkle stop googling lets talk from bartleby
Effects of technology on the human brain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Methods of critical thinking
Having been a teacher when technology began to wire its way into the classroom, Sherry Turkle encompasses her unique perspective into her article “How Computers Change the Way We Think.” Turkle claims that technology changes the way we perceive information and that it compels people to prioritize “face value” over content. First, she argues that computers change our perspective of the world around us and how we process it. To support this claim she mentions a student’s argument that equates a freudian slip to a “computer error or power surge.” In addition, she references students her colleagues have worked with not being able to grasp a concept of scale or do “back of the envelope” math. She uses her credibility as an appeal, citing her personal experiences in the classroom. Next Turkle argues that powerpoint has made people look more at the “face value” than content. She …show more content…
She insists that people tend to only look at how something is presented, not necessarily the actual content. In addition she maintains that people do not think critically as often, merely taking information as it is presented. When addressing this claim Turkle applies combination of ethos and logos. She establishes once again her credibility as a professor in addition to including cited a sources. In Turkle’s use of these appeals, she strengthens her case by both relating it to the audience, as well as improving her credibility by citing another source. , She employs these appeals skillfully and builds a strong argument that is supported by evidence and elevated by her professional opinion. However, her argument could still be improved upon by adding direction quotations or additional cited sources. Even so, Turkle’s argument is presented eloquently and enhanced by her skillful use of
Goldberg, David Theo. “If Technology Is Making Us Stupid, It’s Not Technology’s Fault.” Blog. Digital Humanities. August 16, 2010. Gooch and Suyler. in Argument. Avenue of the Americas, New York.2011. 301-03. Print.
Carr chose to focus on the effect that the internet itself has on learners and professionals, while Turkle elected to identify the way our minds adapt to the ways that computers teach us information. Turkle’s essay, titled “How Computers Change the Way We Think”, she focuses on the idea that technology itself is changing the way we interpret the information and why the material is sometimes different than how we remember it to be. She identifies numerous examples throughout her essay that portray the effect that information gained from the internet is leaving on us. Both of these essays present similar ideas of how technology affects us as learners, but they lead into personal experiences and interpretations of the true lesson to be taught about learning with the internet at your
Turkle throughout her papers has a claim and reasons that support her claims, but her backing and warrants are non-existent, which leads to the emotional rants that make up the article. The audience in general isn’t moved to think her way when all they get from her paper is the rant with nothing to strengthen her points. She also doesn’t give the other side of the argument a chance and continues to bash it without letting it have its fair chance. One of the many examples of her rant structured arguments is “Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be… not too little- just right.” (Turkle). This argument wants people to see how much we can change from who we really are in real life to how we perceive ourselves over the internet. It doesn’t have a backing or any other supporting methods just a claim and a lot of emotion that she hopes will convince you of her main argument. With this Turkle hopes that the audience will be swayed without any effort put into the argument. Instead of being moved to think the way Turkle does, the audience members question the validity of any of her claims due to the fact they are emotionally heavy and do not provide any substance to truly back up her main point in the
In earlier times, the acquisition and spreading of knowledge was not used to improve society. Instead it was used to have control and to exclude certain groups. As one could imagine, there needed to be a change in the way that the education system was set up. In her essay, “Project Classroom Makeover”, Cathy Davidson discusses how the “one size fits all” model of learning hinders students from learning in a new and modernized way. She suggests the notion that using technology to teach and learn can be effective in many ways. Davidson shows that using technology presents the opportunity for a traditional classroom to become more inclusive and creative. The “democratization of knowledge” is the improvement and modernization of how information is taught and learned. Having a modernized and advanced learning system is a vital point for students because they gain insight and experience with what is considered a society dominated by advanced technology. Technology has become a dominant resource in the 21st century which makes it a relevant and essential factor needed to succeed in the world of education and
Turckle notes the change in the culture of literacy, “when I first began studying the computer culture, a small breed of highly trained technologists thought of themselves as ‘computer people.’ That is no longer the case” (606). Computer technologies and resources have become a normal part of everyday life. The availability of millions of sources and endless information has enabled a growth in knowledge and an enhancement of literacy. Turckle helps summarize the impact of technology by saying, “Today, starting in elementary school, students use e-mail, word processing computer simulations, virtual communities, and PowerPoint software. In the process, they are absorbing more than the content of what appears on their screens. They are learning new ways to think about what it means to know and understand” (601-602). This new way of thinking and the capability to use the internet enables students to be more proficient at gathering information. No longer does a person need to wait to borrow the book, drive to the library, find a bookstore; any person, at any time, can search out and discover the information he or she needs from a variety of sources that previously would not have been
People all around agree that technology is changing how we think, but is it changing us for the better? Clive Thompson definitely thinks so and this book is his collection of why that is. As an avid fiction reader I wasn’t sure this book would captivate me, but the 352 pages seemingly flew past me. The book is a whirlwind of interesting ideas, captivating people, and fascinating thoughts on how technology is changing how we work and think.
Over the past few decades, technology has advanced significantly. The use of calculators, computers, and other techniques in many fields has increased. On a large scale, technology is replacing traditional methods of instruction in the field of education. Many people believe that adopting technology in the learning process can increase productivity. However, David Gelernter, a professor at Yale University and a leading figure in the field of technology, suggests limiting the use of technology in the classroom in his article “Unplugged: The Myth of Computers in the Classroom,” published in the New Republic magazine in 1994.
Lee introduces the topic of his presentation by a statement “…We live in the age of Info-whelm.” He explains this statement by summarizing an example of a study conducted in 2003 by researches from Berkley University in California. The researches collected all the data available digitally to today’s generations and found the amount of data available online would be about 5 x the amount of books available in Library of Congress, which is the largest Library in the world. He is explaining this fact to introduce a problem of today’s education and the actual preparedness of the next generation to the job market. He explains how today’s students and even young children are able to process and comprehend digital information. He present several examples of studies conducted to proof how today’s generation is capable to absorb digital image 60 000 x more than generations before them. Lee is effectively using illustrations and images throughout his whole presentation. He explains that today style of lectures in teaching is obsolete and ineffective. He declares how students today are being thought and prepared for jobs of the pass. He urges the educators to provide new sets of skills and tests, and new style of teachings for the future generations. He offers several solutions to prepare present and new generation for future jobs. He proposes teaching
A professor at MIT, by the name of Sherry Turkle writes about the negative effects technology has had on our society. She begins by introducing her experience at MIT during the primitive times of the computer, a time when most faculty did not see the necessity for a personal computer. Sherry’s article is eloquently written through logical, chronological structure. She goes on to illustrate the unforeseen transformation the computer has brought upon our inner personal relationships. The article’s argument is strongly supported by Sherry’s high credibility as an author, being the founder and director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self as well as a professor and researcher in that field
Yes, i know how to use my Google calendar, but most days I just prefer paper. Even though I would love to say I am a digital native, I know am not. I am a digital immigrant who still goes back to paper and traditional ways of teaching and learning at times because that is how I was brought up. I use a SMARTBoard on a daily basis, but I still feel a jolt of excitement when I can use a chalkboard. Yet, this immigrant background helps me understand the teachers who resist technology. I recognize that change is difficult. This chapter will discuss many of these
Technology Is What You Make It The articles “How Computers Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle and “Electronic Intimacy” by Christine Rosen argue that technology is quite damaging to society as a whole and that even though it can at times be helpful it is more damaging. I have to agree and disagree with this because it really just depends on how it is used and it can damage or help the user. The progressing changes in technology, like social media, can both push us, as a society, further and closer to and from each other and personal connections because it has become a tool that can be manipulated to help or hurt our relationships and us as human beings who are capable of more with and without technology. Technology makes things more efficient and instantaneous.
Not having to use our mental abilities is the biggest drawback of technology. It only appears that individuals are becoming smarter because of technology. Truth is the machines are doing the work for us. A book focuses our attention, isolates us from the myriad distractions that fill our everyday lives. A networked computer does precisely the opposite. It is designed to scatter our attention, knowing that the depth of our thought is tied directly to the intensity of our attentiveness. It’s hard not to conclude that as we adapt to the intellectual environment of the Net our thinking becomes shallower. (Gopnik) It’s a catastrophe," said Alan Eaton, a charismatic Latin teacher. He says that technology has led to a "balkanization of their focus and duration of stamina," and that schools make the problem worse when they adopt the technology. (Wollen) "When rock ’n’ roll came about, we didn’t start using it in classrooms like we’re doing with technology," he says. He personally feels the sting, since his advanced classes have one-third as many students as they had a decade ago. (Wollen)
Do you ever think about how much technology has changed the way we work, learn, play, and even think? Technology is a major beneficiary to society; especially in the classroom where we get the opportunity to learn and grow. In recent years, schools have begun implementing tablets and other devices in the classroom to better student’s education. The use of technology in the classroom provides more of a personalized learning experience and gives students a widespread availability to engage in learning. Technology is necessary in today’s modern globe, it is basically “the pen and paper of our time and the lens through which we experience much of our world” (Warlick, 2013). Technology is not just considered the “internet”, it is so much greater than that. Overall, it enhances the quality of education and engages students deeper than ever before. With all the significant gains, why would people argue that technology hinders students more than it helps? Critics may try to repute the use of technology in the classroom but I believe what really matters “is the way we use it, the context that we use it in, and the learners who we use it for” (Chong, 2012).
I read this amazing article about the many ways that technology makes us more stupid. The article is 8 Ways Technology Makes You Stupid by Rebecca Hiscott. The article is posted in The Huffington Post on July 25, 2014. The article mentions a lot of different information about technology and how it influence your brain. Technology can affect your brain by many ways.
“Today’s students are no longer the people our educational system was designed to teach” (Prensky, 2001). This generation was born with technology in their hands and they have absolutely no idea of what life was like without the ever-present cell phone, laptop, or iPad. These click-through students’ technology expectations surpass any previous generational expectations in that everything can be accomplished on a computer; it is not uncommon to hear – there is an app for that or check out YouTube. If you ask a click-through how long they have been using the internet and a computer, their reply more likely will be “my whole