In conclusion, the first problem of this claim is not knowing that humans are in fact apes. Perhaps whoever made the claim implied modern day apes, but that is not clear. Either way humans did not evolve from gorillas and the reason that different species of apes coexist today is because of natural selection in different environments. Like the finches, all apes share a common ancestor, but through millions of years of evolution, new species have been created.
This was the first time that an animal was discovered manufacturing his or her own tool. (Quammen, 110-112) Development of Tool Use In an article penned by Ann Minard for National Geographic News, she explains the once held theory that chimpanzees in the wild learned tool usage from humans is no longer valid. It was once thought modern chimpanzees developed tool usage by imitating farmers. New evidence suggests that chimpanzees have been using stones to crack nuts as far back as 4,300 years ago. (Minard, 1) When chimpanzee archeological sites were found in 2007 in West Africa, archeologist Julio Mercader along with primatologist Christophe Boesch observed the rocks used today by the chimpanzees in West Africa, the only chimpanzees to use rocks to open nuts, resemble those found at the prehistoric sites.
The Role of Gene Mutation in Human Evolution Have you ever looked at a gorilla or a monkey and considered it to be your ancestor? Probably not, but, if you have had that thought then it was probably just because that is what has been taught in our school systems for decades, and probably will be for a long time to come unless proven otherwise. Sure, humans and primates have similar features: facial expressions and structures; fingers; toes; breasts; hair; etc., but there has been no evidence that proves that we are, undoubtedly, a product of natural selection evolving from ape-like species. Ever since the first mentioning of our evolution from such species was introduced, it has been primarily theory, and nothing more. Scientists have been struggling for years to find the scientific evidence linking humans to primates.
Savanna Theory Versus Aquatic Ape Theory of Human Evolution The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers.
2 August 2001. 2 April 2004. < http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2001-08/ou-nsp072701.php> Witmer, Lawrence M. “Nostril Position in Dinosaurs and Other Vertebrates and Its Significance for Nasal Function.” Science 293 (2001): 850-53.
Numerous scientists and scholars have disputed over whether or not when artificial intelligence gets to the point where their thought process is on par with a person, that they will be afforded the same rights that any other human receives in society. Even though no artificial intelligence have passed the Turing test, one scholar by the name of William Lycan seems to think so. In his writings, “Robots and Minds,” Lycan discusses that if a computer driven robot outwardly simulates human behavior, then the artificial intelligence truly has a mind that can process information and make its own decisions. (And if it can make its own decisions, then it should also be morally responsible for their own actions.) Lycan even gave two examples in his writings, Harry and Henrietta, where the two contrasting scenarios begged the ques... ... middle of paper ... ...t whatever it may be.
So engineers today had to guess what made it move. The best guess is that the mechanism used were just like the mechanism in a clock. But for some strange reason Da Vinci did not create the machine. Leo thought that what he drawn up was just a toy - which it was not. had it been created, applications for the machine would have followed.
Food was scarce on the ground. After a couple of hundreds of years, food and the basic necessities for living were at a much more higher reach of the chimpanzees. This meant that instead of chimpanzees walking on four legs, they had to walk on two. The other two body parts they used as legs would soon be turned into... ... middle of paper ... ... originated from one ancestor, the chimpanzee. Not only did we evolve physically, but we also evolved culturally.
KNM-ER 1813. Retrieved April 25, 2014, from Smithsonian website: http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/3d-collection/knm-er-1813 Stanford, C., Allen, J. S., & Antón, S. C. (2012). Exploring biological anthropology: The essentials (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://sasquatchresearchers.org/sasquatch-biology/ Historical Overview. (2006, August). S Parkash. Retrieved Febuary 9, 2014, from http://www.bigfoot-lives.com/html/bigfoot_history.html Kal, K. (2004, July). Exposing Patterson.