More handpicked essays just for you.
The similarities and dissimilarities of the novel and film romeo and juliet adaptation
Modern interpretation of Romeo and Juliet
The similarities and dissimilarities of the novel and film romeo and juliet adaptation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One difference in the movie that is immediately apparent is the time period you can tell the movie is in the 20th century looks like new york city with all the big buildings and the types of cars there where driving. In the book they didn't have much a sword and some raggy clothes. Just by looking at the people you could tell how much cleaner they would be then back in the 15th century. I think the director did this because ,he wanted to have it in modern time something different the audience can understand. In the movie that is in scene 1 is that they used guns instead of swords with the swords names on the guns. The scene also starts at a gas station and they didn't have cars in the 15th century, and in the play the fight was on a street. No one dies and they vote in a jury which no one dies in the 1st scene in both movie and play and, they have a jury in the movie witch to come to peace.The differences between these two works are distinctly illustrated in Act One, Scene One of the text and its matching film scene. Here Shakespeare's text shows Samson and Gregory. Of the house of Capulet exchanging in witty banter. The costumes are also highly modernized. This scene finds the Montague boys are wearing …show more content…
The poetry was good in both play and movie. The difference is the sadness at the end because of paris not being next to romeo and juliet doesn't make it as sad. It was still upsetting when she woke up to romeo dying in her arms then her shooting her self. With the swords and guns mixed up in the movie with the guns. The mixed up shirts with modern made it different like when romeo hide it was in a trailer and he was dressed bad. When juliet was dressed nice and in a proper form of a death bed. The director tried to keep the same meaning and gist of things even know there were some changes to get the audience some twist and get their attention to get hooked into the
There are many differences and similarities in the book, movie, and both. The book is some what different from the movie. There are many differences between the book and the movie. Like when PonyBoy and Johnny went to the movie theater Pony wished that he was big and buff like the guy in the movie.
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
he director, David Attwood, adapted the novel The Hound of the Baskervilles to fit the needs of his film and audience. As a result, there are three major differences. First, the clues in the book and movie are very different. Secondly, the movie has much more action, making the plot diagram quite different. Third, the characters are altered to fit either the book or movies needs or effects. Overall, the clues, plot diagram, and characters in the original The Hound of the Baskervilles can be contrasted in many ways with the movie.
Different film directors normally intercept works of writing in very different way, one example being the balcony scene from Romeo and Juliet. The old English was translated to modern english in the 2013 film and there is a minor plot twist in the 1968 version of the film where Romeo talks to Juliet via a tree. However, despite the changes, both films are enjoyable and stick to the
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
The first movie taken in the 1980’s was not as good at the original. This is due to the acting in the movie that took away from the original characters and their characterization. One example of this can be seen with Friar Lawrence, and it is seen when he leaves Juliet with Romeos body. What happens is that he seems more courageous, and tries to get Juliet out of there. However, he simply offers her little to no help in the original, and then ditches her with giving her no help what so ever. The next flaw compared to the original by Shakespeare is in the themes, and that the original focuses more on true love while the other focuses on the consequences of forbidden love. This can be seen by how dramatic and painful Romeos death is by poison and Juliet’s gory death by stabbing herself. This emphasis the consequences that are created by dangerous love. Likewise, in the original they do it gently and fast to make it seem like less of a sacrifice. The final way the Shakespearian version is better is due to the setting. The reasoning for this is because in the original the setting was open to the reader’s interpretations. While the movie just ...
What stuck out as being most different between the two versions of the movie were how the characters acted. In the classic version, Juliet is a much more timid girl and seems much less "experienced" than in the newer version. I feel that her shyness makes her more desireable. It makes their romance seem much more innocent and more meaningful at the same time. I feel that the new Romeo is much less shy in the newer version. This makes their love seem much more lustful, rather than meaningful. Another actor that seemes to change drastically is Tybalt. In the original version, he seems to be much more in control. Tybalt in the newer version is extremely bitter and much more controlled by his uncle.
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
In the movie, it is told in a third person point of view and the characters look a lot more different than how they do in the book. The movie goes by much quicker than the book. Also Pony goes straight home after the church burns down.
This version of Romeo and Juliet shows the audience the old feud between white people and black people, whereas the Luhrmann edition of Romeo and Juliet shows the audience a feud between both families similar in status. Due to the fact that the era when the play was set, the most common and biggest fight was the feud between white people and black people. Also in this version, some things were emphasised, such as the theme love triumphs over hate, and the idea that love can break down the barriers between the two races. In the first act, scene one, Tybalt says “I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee cowards” From this quote, we can tell that there are a lot of hate between the Montagues and Capulets for a very long time. This quote is part of the exposition of the play, because this sets up the conflict between two families. However, in the last scene, when Romeo and Juliet all die, the Capulet family and the Montague family all come together. This is shown in Act 5, when Capulet says “O brother Montague, give me thy hand.” In the quote, the idea love rules over hate is emphasised, Capulet addresses Montague brother, which means that the two families have stopped the fight and they are trying to restore friendly relationships between each other. In the same quote, a metaphor was used when Capulet called Montague