HOW DOES TWO CULTURES CLASING LEAD TO MURDER? HONOR KILLINGS - THE SHAFIA FAMILY. Honor killings are acts of retribution, frequently causing death. These acts are often committed by the male family members against female family members. Victims of honour killings are believed to have brought dishonor or shame upon the family.
There needs to be one source of rule. There are people motivated by a communal expectation that murdered relatives will be avenged, and there are others like Orestes who face impossible choices. In Agamemnon, Clytaemnestra kills her husband, Agamemnon and his slave, Cassandra. Clytaemnestra felt betrayed when Agamemnon sacrificed their daughter, Iphigenia for his own selfish reasons. Clytaemnestra believes that she is ending a curse of bloodshed that has continued for several generations.
Throughout each country there is a variety of culture and religion. In each religion consists of the systematic patterns of beliefs, values, and behavior acquired by people as a member of their society. Although each religion has its very own different belief there is a couple that in counter with the spree of honor killing. Honor killing, also known as customary killing, is the when a murder has occurred in a family or clan member by one or more fellow family members, in which the community believes the victim to have had brought dishonor upon the community. News events within these countries discuss several horrific crimes relating the belief in murdering a person that cause any kind of shame as an honor to their family or community.
Revenge in Aeschylus' The Oresteia Trilogy and Sophocles' Electra The act of revenge in classical Greek plays and society is a complex issue with unavoidable consequences. In certain instances, it is a more paramount concern than familial ties. When a family member is murdered another family member is expected to seek out and administer revenge. If all parties involved are of the same blood, the revenge is eventually going to wipe out the family. Both Aeschylus, through "The Oresteia Trilogy," and Sophocles, through "Electra," attempt to show the Athenians that revenge is a just act that at times must have no limits on its reach.
the fictional character, Medea, murderedmurdured her own two sons. When hearing about these extreme atrocities we are repulsed. What sane mother could murder her own children? But thats just the point isn't it, no sane mother would kill her own young. No, each of these women had underlying psychological issues that led to them committing these unnatural, morally wrong acts.
Sociology Assignment Honor Killing An honor killing is the homicide of a member of a family by other members, due to the perpetrators' belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family, or has violated the principles of a community or a religion, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage, being in a relationship that is disapproved by their family, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, or engaging in homosexual relations. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing) There are many Cases of Honor killing all over the world but for me the most shocking incident was the Aarushi Talwar Murder Case. That incident shocked the whole nation as a 16 year old girl was murdered and the most interesting part is that the blame was on her father to kill her. With this, one more dead body was found and that was of their servant. After all this the blame was again on father that he has killed his daughter and servant as he saw both of them in a compromising position.
But is this a “fair” or “just”punishment for crimes committed by an individual? Depending on the severity of the crime, and its circumstances, it just may be. A large part in the justification of the death penalty is based on the same idea as this early thought. One way to think of it, is that some crimes are so serious in nature, and emotional cost to others, that the only logical or just solution may be to pay the deed, or wrongful act, back in full, by giving one’s own life as restitution. Families of victims often become bitter and angry about the outcome of a crime, the loss of their loved one, and feel as if the death penalty is perhaps the only fair punishment for the violators of the law.
Basically, there are two rationales in this theory of punishment are first, for the victims or their relatives in the case of death, that the state represent for their dissatisfaction towards the offender. Besides, this also protect from they having private retaliation to the offender. Second, is for the public at large that the public has a need for revenge. Punishment is considered an expression of justified anger by the victim due to the violation of trust demanded by society . It is morally right as the when the person is convicted, they must get the punishment.
Death Penalty- It does sound cruel but what if a brother knew a man who killed his sister brutally to death and made her suffer till her last breath? Would he still not want that man to die? Wouldn’t he demand for justice? Yes of course he would. He might want him to die the same way the murderer killed his sister,.
Honor killings are murders committed by those in a person’s family toward those who are believed to be bringing upon dishonor to the family. Honor killings can be dated back to the time of the Ancient Roman Empire where the patriarch of a family owned the right of life and death for any member of his household. Women pregnant out of wedlock were often killed to prevent the ruination of her family’s reputation. Usually once a family’s reputation is tarnished it can never be undone so the killing of the person associated with it is necessary to protect others in the family. Honor killings continue to be a major issue in many cultures as teens are starting to follow the new customs of the twenty-first century.