Homosexuality

745 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Similarities of gender identity and sexual orientation

Anything justifiable by logic, and that which derives from the nature of the word is a Natural law ( or a law in nature). In “Is homosexuality Unnatural” written by Bruton M. Leisure, he argues against the natural law opposition to homosexuality by recognizing the word “natural” itself as ambiguous, meaning that the work natural can have different meaning within different context. Well, in what meaning do people intend to use unnatural to describe homosexuality? Leisure gives possible meanings for the word unnatural, but then turns them down by applying a similar example that deviate them from the definition of natural.
Leisure first explains to the reader what a natural law would consist of, if it were in fact to be “a law in nature” rather than a “man made law.” Currently in our legislation, debates about homosexuality and same sex marriage are being discussed. Hence, Homosexuals are being deprived of marriage, yet expecting nothing in return for their future outcome besides that of marriage itself, leisure writes, “ Natural laws are not passed by any legislator or group of legislators; they impose no obligation upon anyone or anything; their violation entails no penalty, and there is no reward for following them or abiding by them (158)”. We can conclude that when homosexuals practice their sexual preference, they are not acting in accordance with an unnatural manner.
Leisure asserts that perhaps they meant “natural” is something man cannot intervene with, and that by saying something is “not natural, we mean that it is a product of human artifice” (159). Hence, What many in a society would consider natural may not so be in this sense; for natural means that the “substance of which it is composed have not been removed from t...

... middle of paper ...

...vice versa. For is they did, “their claim would be empty ”because homosexuality is not evil”. Those who believe that heterosexual is the way to be, meaning natural or what it is, does not explain why it should not be. And vice versa, what ought to be does not mean that because something is not, one has to go back and find solutions for what was not meant; something’s just happen.
Leisure’s article provides us with examples that deter the word natural to its various definitions when referring to homosexuality, and why they were inconsistent. He provides various examples to emphasize that homosexuality is not unnatural, and in this case we were “enable to find a meaning for unnatural that enables us to arrive at the conclusion that homosexuality is unnatural or that if homosexuality is unnatural, it is therefore wrongful behavior”.

Works Cited

mary anne warren

Show More
Related

  • John Corvino's Arguments For The Morality Of Homosexuality

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Natural law theorists claim that actions are deemed right just because they are looked at as natural and something that is unnatural is immoral. However, there are different understandings of what is natural and what is not, which can make support for this theory hard. Examples such as homosexuality, give a strong argument against the natural law theory. We will look at the work of John Corvino as he explains the arguments for the immorality of homosexuality, but also the reasons why these arguments are not strong evidence. With these examples in mind, the fact that something is unnatural is not a good enough reason to claim something immoral.

    Read More

  • Homosexuality Research

    2650 Words  | 6 Pages

    I chose this topic because there is an issue of homophobia around the world. I find it interesting as to why people are homosexual, and if there is a gene responsible for this or if it can be developed later in life. This area of research directly relates to the age old question of “nature Vs. nurture”.

    Read More

  • John Corvino And The Morality Of Homosexuality

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    One point that Corvino makes is that even if homosexuality is unnatural, it would not be correct to say homosexuality is immoral. Let’s assume that homosexuality is unnatural in all aspects. Corvino’s claim would still hold true, homosexual sex would be moral. As mentioned in the essay, “unnatural” holds various definitions. Deviating from the norm would still be morally insignificant, innate desires are still not a good judgment or morality, and sex organs continue to serve more of a purpose than just procreation. The only argument of Corvino that would be up for debate would be the comparison to animals. If homosexuality does not occur in the natural world, then humans should not do it and is therefore

    Read More

  • Michael Levin and Abnormal Homosexuality

    1539 Words  | 4 Pages

    Homosexuality is a sensitive topic and often avoided in conversation. For centuries the human race has oppressed and persecuted others strictly because they are gay, lesbian, bisexual etc. Although disturbing to most of us, these actions still occur in our society today, as many believe that homosexuality is abnormal and disgraceful. One supporter of this belief is Michael Levin, who strongly believes that homosexuality is highly abnormal and thus, undesirable. Although his beliefs and theories supporting this claim are subjective, there is evidence that can support his stance on this topic; we will analyze this claim in further detail and how it relates to his other views mentioned in this essay.

    Read More

  • A Discourse on Inequality

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the “natural state”, Rousseau suggests that we should strip man of all the “supernatural gifts” he may have been given over the course of time. He says we should “consider him, in a word, just as he must have come from the hands of nature, we behold in him an animal weaker than some, and less agile than others; but, taking him all around, the most advantageously organized of any.” He presumes that man’s needs would be easily satisfied. His food was easily gained, as wa...

    Read More

  • Essay On The Feminist Movement

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    Osmond and Thorne (1993) stated that “heterosexuality has been long assumed to be the norm and other sexual practices have been deemed deviant” (p. 616). However, the norm has not ways suited everyone in our community and society. Some of the people in our society don’t see gender as man and woman, but in a different way. There has constantly been the issue that relationships and marriages are supposed to be with a man and woman, however, it seems as if that has changed over time. Now people believe that true love doesn’t necessary have to be with a man or woman, but with whoever they are attracted to. A feminist leader by the name of Adrienne Rich states “if heterosexuality were “natural” … there would be no need for the many deliberate and coercive efforts to channel individual in that direction” (Osmond & Thorne, 1993, p. 616). What Rich meant was if man and woman were supposed to be together naturally, why is there a need for a constant reminder that man and woman should do so. Rich also insinuated that women are born homosexual tendencies due to the erotic tie with their mothers. Whether this is valid or not this is a statement that needs a bit more research conducted on it, before making a bold statement as

    Read More

  • A Defense Of Homosexuality By John Corvino

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    He believes that a lot of thing that people value in life, such as clothing and medicine, “are unnatural in some sense” (211). Yet, no one suggests those being immoral. On the other hand, disease and death, for example, “are ‘natural’ in the sense that they occur ‘in nature’” (211). So being unusual isn’t enough to be called as immoral. The arguements of abnormal, offensive or disguesting do not make things “unnatural” either because there are activities such as eating snails or cleaning toilets that disguest people but aren’t listed as immoral. Moreover, arguements such as animal practice and moral innation do not label homoseuality unnatural because after all, what is normal can't in any way, shape or form be characterized. By the end of this section, he concluded that “homosexuality is either perfectly natural or, if unnatural, is not unnatural in a way that makes it immoral”

    Read More

  • Russ Shafer Landau's Theory Of The Natural Law Theory

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    I acknowledge the meaning of Natural Law, and agree with the ways it originates morals. Human nature is a topic that can be argued multiple times, yet there may never be an exact conclusion as to how things should be. Natural Law explains why certain things are right and why others are wrong. First, it is obvious that Natural Law is solely based on humans, since we have the capability of being moral agents. Also it is evident that morality isn 't based on opinions alone, therefore, allowing nature to fill in the blanks to the unanswered

    Read More

  • To Build A Fire: Naturalism

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    To conclude, naturalism has many definitions and characteristics. It was a powerful movement which suggested the role and influence of the environment, one’s background, and one’s social status had in shaping human character. The major characteristics of it include the environments power or control over humans, objective science, instinct, pessimism, and detachment.

    Read More

  • Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex? An Essay by John Corvino

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order for Corvino to make his position that gay sex is not morally “unnatural”, he must first respond to several arguments. Many natural law theorists believe that sexual organs should only be used for three distinct purposes; reproduction, making a home for children through marriage, and emotional bonds. However, Corvino responds to this by arguing many of the human organs can be used for different functions, therefore we cannot make an argument defending only sexual organs. In his work he refers to this principle of what can be considered natural and unnatural when stating, “If the unnaturalness charge is to be more than empty rhetorical flourish, those who levy it must specify what they mean” (Corvino 84). He uses this statement to support his claim that gay sex is morally natural by proving that society often claims many “unnaturally” processed goods as being natural. If this is the case then we cannot define a human function as “unnatural” with any moral justification.

    Read More

  • Anderman's Argumentative Analysis

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is assumed that sex was designed by nature exclusively for the purpose of procreation: partaking in sex for anything outside of its “natural intent” is deemed immoral. However, although heterosexual couples frequently engage in sexual activity for reasons other than procreation, one can assume that Anderman amends his argument by pointing out that procreation is a possibility of heterosexual sex, whereas it is impossible in homosexual sex. He continues to assert that not only is any act that cannot produce offspring immoral, but that the state has an interest in preventing these acts from occurring. Consequently, this definition of morality opens a variety of questions concerning non-homosexual groups that fall under the umbrella of sex acts that hold no possibility of

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis of Schulman's Article 'Gay Marriage and Marriage'

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    Society is created with both homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Previously when certain laws discriminated against others, such as law for women's rights to vote, these laws were changed. Changing the traditions of the country does not mean that it will lead to the legalization of other extreme issues. Each ...

    Read More

  • Being Gay Is Natural

    1800 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this way a person can try to push off accusations of bigotry , intolerance , etc. because it’s just a matter of credible observation as to what is and it's not a proper part of the natural order. In real life, claims about the natural order or the natural law only end up being masked for religious, political, or social prejudices. A common and simple meaning is that heterosexual relationships are “natural” because it is what we find in nature, whereas we don’t find homosexual relationships. The last one is therefore unnatural and should not be acknowledged by society. A good example of this attitude toward the “unnaturalness” of homosexuality is expressed by Peter Akinola, Anglican Archbishop of Nigeria. He says that he can not think that a man in the right mind would have a sexual relationship with another man and that even in animals we don't hear things like this.There are a lot of possible objections to this. First, humans are a part of nature, so if humans have homosexual relationships, Secondly, we don’t find dogs, cows, and lions entering into legal marriage contracts with one another. These objections point to the logical flaws in the argument, the argument is factually

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Homosexuality

    1649 Words  | 4 Pages

    “All men are created equal, No matter how hard you try, you can never erase those words,” Harvey Milk. A homosexual, as defined by the dictionary, is someone of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex. Homosexuality is ethical, and I will provide rational arguments for, and irrational arguments against the topic. A few objections are as follows: It is forbidden in the Bible and frowned upon by God; It is unnatural; Men and women are needed to reproduce; There are no known examples in nature; and the most common argument that concerns homosexuality is whether it is a choice or human biology.

    Read More

  • Homosexuality in Today's Society

    1992 Words  | 4 Pages

    Homosexuality in Today's Society. In today's society, there exists a mixture of issues which tend to raise arguments with people all over. There are a handful of topics that always seem to escalate these differences between people to the point where one who earnestly participates in discussion, debate and argument can direct their anger towards their feelings on the person themselves. Some examples of such delicate subjects are the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia.

    Read More

More about Homosexuality

Open Document