Hollywood Shootout

2192 Words5 Pages

The documentary of the Hollywood Shootout showed clear issues in policing. These issues were surprising and impacted my view of policing. Firstly, police lack availability of high power weapons is shocking. The shootout lasted for nearly an hour. The documentary mentioned that the police officers only had smaller handguns and a few shotguns while the suspects had AK-47s and rifles (OnlyBim, 2021). There were around three hundred police officers present at the scene, and it still took them about an hour to stop the suspects, due to their lack of efficient weapons. Secondly, the tactics used by the police were also surprising. The documentary also mentions how the police were not prepared for this type of situation and how they were unable to …show more content…

What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Miranda v Arizona was a very important case that had a great impact. Miranda v Arizona is so important as the case resulted in the establishment of Miranda rights. Before Miranda v Arizona, citizens still had the right to counsel and to remain silent; however, police officers did not have to read these rights to suspects. In Miranda v Arizona (1965) the court reports show that it was decided that a person in custody and who is being interrogated must be informed that they have the right to remain silent and the right to have counsel. In Miranda v Arizona (1965) the Supreme Court decided that not informing the suspect of their rights is unconstitutional. After the Supreme Court ruling, law enforcement was then required to read these rights to every suspect who is arrested and interrogated. Failure of police to read the rights results in an unusable confession. The Supreme Court often affects law in the United States. In the United States, the Supreme Court is the highest-level court, and the decisions made by the Supreme Court cannot be appealed. The Supreme Court does not often overturn laws. The cases that the Supreme Court deals with tend to be controversial. Many of the cases that come before the Supreme Court have high impacts and are not just for the two parties. While the Supreme Court does not directly create laws, their decisions still hold a lot of power. The Supreme Court interprets laws and the rights of …show more content…

What is the difference between a.. I watched documentaries over the Antananarivo prison in Madagascar, the South Cotabato jail in the Philippines, and the San Pedro prison in La Paz, Bolivia. In my opinion, the prison with the best structure is the South Cotabato jail. This jail in the Philippines does have many problems, such as overcrowding, inmate on inmate violence, and bad food. Even so, this prison is more organized than the Antananarivo Prison and the San Pedro prison. The South Cotabato jail takes mugshots of its inmates and keeps more detailed records, as opposed to the other prisons. According to the documentary, the South Cotabato jail separates the more dangerous criminals and repeat offenders from the rest of the inmates (Free Documentary, 2021, 8:15). The other prisons do not separate the dangerous inmates from the others. The South Cotabato jail also has security cameras, unlike the other prisons. The South Cotabato jail also makes sure to isolate any sick prisons, this is not done in the Antananarivo prison or the San Pedro prison. In the San Pedro prison, the prison guards never go into the actual jail, and in the Antananarivo prison the guards never check the cells. In the documentary it is mentioned that the guards at the South Cotabato jail inspect the jails for contraband, once a month (Free Documentary, 2021, 30:10). The Antananarivo prison and the San Pedro prison do not attempt checks for contraband. Changes can be made to improve the conditions of

Open Document