Hitler and Stalin: A Comparison of Traits Contributing to the Rise to Power

1977 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Chapter 9 world history totalitarianism

With the dawn of civilization soon thereafter followed the creation of authoritarian and totalitarian establishments. The history of man is inundated with instances of leaders rising to power over certain groups of people and through various means gaining formidable control to be used for good, evil, or an ambiguous mixture of both. However, it is an undeniable fact that once unchecked power is acquired, tyranny often ensues, and thus a dictatorial regime is born. Over the centuries, governmental establishments have risen and fallen, but as history and civilization progress, so does the potential for a larger and more powerful domination. The development of differing and contrasting theologies and structural philosophies leads not only to conflict, but perhaps more prominently to unification under one rule with a common belief, especially when that unifying belief provides a promising sense of belonging and structure to a weak society. This is what led to the rise of two of the most domineering totalitarian governments in history: Stalin’s Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and Hitler’s Nazi Germany, or the Third Reich. The establishment and success of both the USSR and Nazi Germany are largely due to one common factor. The attributes of Stalin and Hitler enabled them to successfully gain and maintain complete control over their government and enforce total rule to establish the party superiority. Schlesinger describes leadership as the ability to “move, inspire, and mobilize masses of people so that they act together in pursuit of an end” (Schlesinger 1). Stalin and Hitler themselves as individuals and leaders are as infamous and complex as the ruthless totalitarian governments they implemented. Being on polar opposite... ... middle of paper ... .... Works Cited Hoobler, Dorothy, and Thomas Hoobler. Joseph Stalin. New York: Chelsea House, 1985. Print. Hyde, Harford Montgomery. Stalin: The History of a Dictator. London: Hart-Davis, 1971. Print. Stalcup, Brenda. Adolf Hitler. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, 2000. Print. Kershaw, Ian. Hitler: A Biography. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2008. Print. Bullock, Alan. Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York: Knopf, 1992. Print. Bullock, Alan. Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York: Knopf, 1992. Print. Service, Robert. Stalin: A Biography. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 2005. Print. Snyder, Timothy. Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin. New York: Basic, 2010. Print. Fiehn, Terry, and Chris Corin. Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin. London: John Murray, 2002. Print. Deutscher, Isaac. Stalin; a Political Biography. New York: Oxford UP, 1967. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moss, W., 2014. A History of Russia Volume 2: Since 1855. 1st ed. London, England: Anthem Press London, pp.112-113.

    Read More

  • The Similarities Of Adolph Hitler And Joseph Stalin

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    To conclude, Hitler and Stalin were both horrible men who committed countless crimes, but they accomplished a lot given their circumstances. They both took over their country with hard work and organized innumerable amounts of crimes. They had far fetched goals, but they strived to accomplish them with all their might. They were both very bad men, but they did a lot, and accomplished a

    Read More

  • Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin: A Comparative Analysis

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the time that led up to World War II there was two national leaders who rose to power. They caused misery and death to millions of people while under their rule. These two well-known national leaders were Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. They were two of the most murderous leaders the world has ever seen, and were surprisingly similar in many ways. These two widely known national leaders had many similarities such as both of them killed millions of innocent people, both rose in power due to favorable conditions, and both were very skilled users in propaganda.

    Read More

  • The Key Roles Of Adolf Hitler's Rise To Power

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Looking back at the past, individuals can read about how some of the world’s most powerful leaders have risen, and fallen. These leaders helped their country in their own unique way that ranges anywhere from conquering other countries, to aiding their own country in a depression. In their own way, each leader has a façade that they show as the rise to power, and one individual sticks out from the rest. Adolf Hitler rose to power in a unique way that was comparable to some, but still vastly different. A lot of key factors in Hitler’s life, played key

    Read More

  • Adolf Hitler and The Soviet Union

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    On June 22, 1941, the Adolf Hitler launched a ruthless attack on his so-called ally, the Soviet Union. In December 1941, after a short five months, Operation Barbarossa, induced by the Nazi’s, failed. The Nazi Party ultimately fell to its demise, through the fail of Operation Barbarossa, from a combination of Hitler’s arrogance towards the Soviets as well as the Soviet response, but most importantly, Hitler’s greatest mistake: spreading his troops too wide across a colossal Russia.

    Read More

  • Communism In The Russian Revolution

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    Introduction Russia is generally apportioned the benefit of having introduced a political phenomenon that basically provided an alternative to capitalism: communism. Since this concept was only set in motion at the turn of the 20th century, we can therefore deduce that, to a large extent, Russia is, to most people, synonymous with leaders such as Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. This supposition is entirely based on the premise that the Russian revolution of 1914 inherently altered the socio-cultural and socio-political direction of the nation, bringing into birth a never before envisioned era where Russia was not ruled by the Tsars, but by simple men; men who spoke to and articulated the needs of the masses. To this extent, communism, therefore, is largely misconceived as having been the fulcrum of Russia’s civilization. Much of this misconception, as signaled earlier, is based on the growth and progression of the Russian society in the years after the revolution until 1990, when the Berlin wall fell, essentially bringing down with it decades of Soviet Union tradition based on communism.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Stalin and Hitler as Dictators

    1263 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Comparison of Stalin and Hitler as Dictators Adolf Hitler This assignment will introduce you to two men, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Two men that were responsible for genocide and mass destruction, similar in many ways though on two opposing sides with completely different fundamental ideas. Adolf Hitler was born as Adolf Schicklgruber in 1889 in Braunau am Inn, in Upper Austria and committed suicide in a Berlin bunker in 1945. He was Chancellor and Fuehrer of the Nazi-Empire from 1933 to 1945. Joseph Stalin was born as Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili in 1879 in the Caucasian town of Gori in Georgia and died of a brain haemorrhage in 1953 in Moscow.

    Read More

  • Stalin Vs. Hitler

    2651 Words  | 6 Pages

    Josef Stalin, a politician from the earliest beginnings of his life, strove to achieve a national sense of power during his reign over the citizens of Russia. Adolf Hitler, however, a born high school dropout somewhat longed for a place in life. He rather fell into his role as a politician, after his brief shortcomings in arts and sciences. These two individuals developed varying ideas to put their controlling minds to work to lead their political parties in the direction of total domination of the state.

    Read More

  • Economic, Political and Social Effects of Stalin's Purges

    2363 Words  | 5 Pages

    In order to conclude the extent to which the Great Terror strengthened or weakened the USSR, the question is essentially whether totalitarianism strengthened or weakened the Soviet Union? Perhaps under the circumstances of the 1930s in the approach to war a dictatorship may have benefited the country in some way through strong leadership, the unifying effect of reintroducing Russian nationalism and increased party obedience. The effects of the purges on the political structure and community of the USSR can be described (as Peter Kenez asserts) as an overall change from a party led dictatorship to the dictatorship of a single individual; Stalin. Overall power was centred on Stalin, under whom an increasingly bureaucratic hierarchy of party officials worked. During the purges Stalin's personal power can be seen to increase at the cost of the party.

    Read More

  • The Iranian Revolution and the Russian Revolution

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590

    Read More

  • Differences Between Hitler And Stalin

    229 Words  | 1 Pages

    The secret police were used during both Stalin and Hitler’s rule in order to carry out political repression and extermination, in addition to acquiring secret and possessing intelligence. Stalin used the NKVD (People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs) to conduct purges of those suspected of harboring “anti-Soviet elements”, such as political opponents (Gellately 245). However, the NKVD was responsible for the arrests and exterminations that were often based on quotas by regions (Gellately 246). They also were an integral part of the exterminations of minorities later on during Stalin’s rule, targeting people and religions such as the Greek Orthodox, Poles and Germans. Similarly, Hitler used the Gestapo, a consolidation of police forces,

    Read More

  • George Orwell’s 1984 and Stalin’s Russia

    2134 Words  | 5 Pages

    A. Soviet History. Marxists.org. 2010. Web. The Web. The Web.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hitler And Stalin

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stalin welcomed Marxism, a philosophy introduced by his predecessor, Vladimir Lenin. Even when Stalin had peaked in power, he honored Lenin as the father of the Soviet Communist Party (Frankel, 2000, 134-139). Hitler, on the other hand, had to gather together a philosophy of his own. This led to the disjointed belief system of the Nazi Party, which was based on a combination of violence, racism, and a warped German Christianity; the only thing holding these things together was an acute form of anti-Semitism. Stalin and Hitler both proclaimed a zeal for his morals and claimed that humanity would be saved if only they were followed worldwide (Frankel, 2000, 134-139). Stalin and Hitler also agreed that society should be run empirically, or by scientific methods. The Soviet Union implemented this empirical ideology by introducing the "five-year plans," consisting of agricultural reforms and the forming of the gulag, a collection of labor camps. Hitler adopted this idea and translated it to the "four-year plan." This plan brought a quick restoration of the German army and the cold, orderly characteristics of the concentration camps. Stalin and Hitler attempted to justify their cruel agendas by claiming that they were necessary for the progression of science and technology (Frankel, 2000, 134-139). But, however similar Stalin and Hitler were in their actions, their political

    Read More

  • Hitler’s Rise to Power

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the year of 1933 Adolf Hitler seized the position of chancellor of Germany and this power that he received in January 30th is what shaped one of the most bloodlust dictatorships that this world has ever known. Hitler’s desire for power and victory made him one of the greatest leaders the world has ever seen but it also made him one of the most cruel and heartless people known to mankind. But how did he do this, how did he become one of the greatest and cruellest dictators? Throughout this essay we will explore the long, short and immediate causes for Hitler’s sudden success.

    Read More

  • The Power Of Adolf Hitler

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... and fascism offered bold new approaches to modern politics. These ideologies maintained that democracy was effeminate and that it wasted precious time in building consensus among citizens. Totalitarian leaders’ military style made representative government and the democratic values of the United States, France, and Great Britain appear feeble- a sign that these societies were on the decline. Totalitarianism put democracies on the defensive as they aimed to restore prosperity while still upholding individual rights and the rule of law”(Hunt & Martin, 852).

    Read More

More about Hitler and Stalin: A Comparison of Traits Contributing to the Rise to Power

Open Document