History: The Americans and Japanese at War, Questions and Answers

947 Words2 Pages

QUESTION 2. Did America’s conduct of World War II uphold the “Good War” hypothesis that the war united the American people with a clear, widely shared moral purpose, and that Americans fought the war in a noble and heroic manner? Evidence: Draw on the following readings: Bess (at least three different chapters), Iwo Jima reading (March 26), “Making the American Consensus” (April 16), and “Swing Goes to War”, and any other readings you think would help you build a strong argument. The Americans and Japanese both fought valiantly for their country but Americans never saw suicide as acceptable tactics the way the Japanese did. Stark contrasts in both cultural and political aspects of warfare showcases the fundamentally different ways soldiers conducted themselves in times the outlook seemed bleak. Kamikaze divers were prevalent during World War II and their readiness to die in order to take out a target never ceased to astound Allied troops since “there was something alien and repugnant to an American in this act of deliberate self-immolation” (Bess). True, many times a soldier fighting for the USA would face unsurmountable odds whether it be Battle of Midway or Battle of Leyte but the difference between the two cultures is the way they chose to fight the battle. Americans refused to give up and adamantly fought any way they could to secure a victory however unlikely or slim the odds were. Any idea of suicide is considered abhorrent in Western culture because it violates the basic human principle of humanistic principles. Sacrificing oneself to save a life is way different than committing suicide in order to fulfill a military objective. To purposely give up one’s life in order to achieve victory is a tactic Americans would rarel... ... middle of paper ... ...olved in the raid. The city was not attacked as retribution for earlier German bombing raids on cities such as Rotterdam and Coventry, either. In revenge for the destruction of these cities, bombed ruthlessly by the Luftwaffe in 1940, Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne and countless other German towns big and small had already paid dearly in 1942, 1943, and 1944. Furthermore, by the beginning of 1945, the Allied commanders knew perfectly well that even the most ferocious bombing raid would not succeed in “terrorizing [the Germans] into submission,”[2] so that it is not realistic to ascribe this motive to the planners of the operation. The bombing of Dresden, then, seems to have been a senseless slaughter, and looms as an even more terrible undertaking than the atomic obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which is at least supposed to have led to the capitulation of Japan.

More about History: The Americans and Japanese at War, Questions and Answers

Open Document