Cinema Vs Japanese Cinema

939 Words2 Pages

Japanese cinema during the early history of film and through the silent era was similar yet quite different as the history of cinema in the United States and the rest of the western world. Although Japan didn’t have an entrepreneur or inventor trying to invent filmmaking like in England, France, and the United States, it did already have a taste for moving pictures and visual storytelling, leading a transition into film quite natural. Similar to the west, Japanese cinema took its earliest form from other theatrical visual mediums to portray the story being told. Also like anywhere else in cinema history (or history itself), Japanese cinema started out with some exclusionary practices for women. Unlike the west, the silent era of Japan lasted much longer than that of Hollywood, which was already mainly talkies by the 1930s. During this time, Japan was able to …show more content…

Soon after, businessmen such as Inabata Katsutaro showed off the Vitascope and Cinematograph in early 1897. It wasn’t until Gabriel Veyre, who worked for the Lumiere Brothers, recorded kendo practices in 1897 that the process of filmmaking was introduced to the Japanese. Like the early films around the world, film in Japan showed the spectacle of movement. Instead of a kiss or a strongman, the first Japanese films had sword practice as its subject. Unlike their Western counterparts, the Japanese weren’t as surprised by film as Westerners because of their fondness of utishi-e (aka: magic lanterns). By the 1910s, Japan was a part of the world market in cinema consumption. In 1904, under the employment of Thomas Edison, Edwin S. Porter made two films specifically for Japanese audiences called Battle of Chemulpo Bay (1904) and Battle of Yalu (1904). Both of these films were shot at Thomas Edison’s New Jersey studio and made use of authentic uniforms to show the stories of two battles of the Russo-Japanese

Open Document