History And Modern Historiography Of India

661 Words2 Pages

In attempting to define the history and modern identity of postcolonial nations, Partha Chatterjee calls to attention the many paradoxes inherent in the cultural fabric of India. It is a country, he notes, with a modern culture based on native tradition that has been influenced by its colonial period. This modern culture contains conflicts and contradictions that create the ambiguity in India’s national identity. This is also the central argument in Ganesh N. Devy’s Of Many Heroes where, in tracing the Literary Historiography of India, he cements the fact that all literary, traditional and historical movements in India have germinated from the togetherness of its cultural, social and lingual multiplicity. Both seem to adhere to U. R. Anantha Murthy’s understanding of Indian culture as a mosaic pattern of tradition and modernity. He writes of a heterodox reality where the intellectual self is in conflict with the emotional, the rational individual experiences the sad nostalgia of the exile from his traditional roots and in fluctuating between belief and non-belief he works out his dilemmas. This paper attempts a reading of the transgression of “Love Laws” in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things as not only the representation of this heterodox modernity in the personal domain as a reflection of the larger national conflict but also a postcolonial writer’s dilemmas in search for an identity and their troubles in expressing it.
Roy’s The God of Small Things illustrates history as “a dominating, oppressive force that saturates virtually all social and cultural spaces, including the familial, intimate, and affective relationships.” (Needham 372). Roy herself writes that the book “connects the very smallest things to the very biggest…...

... middle of paper ...

...mprobable. Civilization is based on repression of expressions of love but the desire to transgress is one of its basic urges. Roy seems to draw upon this and says, “To me the god of small things is the inversion of God. God’s a big thing and God’s in control. The god of small things…is not accepting of what we think of as adult boundaries.” (Gutheinz 3)
In the depiction of history as a powerful force of order and classification, the novel tends to celebrate its opposite in images of mixedness and hybridity. "Edges, Borders, Boundaries, Brinks and Limits" (Roy 3) are constantly blurred in the text. There are no fixed boundaries that separate the world of those who make the laws and the world of the transgressors, as Roy writes “They all broke the rules. They all crossed into forbidden territory” (Roy 31). All members of the Ipe family ‘transgress’ in different ways.

Open Document