Hipm Hop Vs Hip Hop

1045 Words3 Pages

Hip-hop has had 30 years to seep into the national bloodstream, and our cultural guardians have spent much of that time trying to fit the form into musical narratives that stretch from jazz and the blues to rhythm and blues, soul music, funk and rock 'n' roll. Most of these have been well-intentioned efforts -- and, almost without exception, they've gotten the story half-wrong: with hindsight, hip-hop's grab-bag, collage-driven aesthetic looks more like a radical break with the blues-based idioms that dominated popular music in the previous century. But in a deeper sense the comparisons ring true: the blues emerged during Jim Crow, transcended their local origin and translated to every corner of the globe. Hip-hop forced its way through the rubble of the 70's-era South Bronx on its way to become the international phenomenon it is today. Both forms represented end runs around stalled political processes (the Reconstruction, and the failures of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, respectively); each involved great rechannelings of creative energies, and each came to serve as a template for social change, both here and abroad. Jeff Chang's history of what he calls ''the hip-hop generation'' takes that template as its starting point -- it's less a history of music than a record of the cultural movement the music inspired, as well as an attempt to define the ''hopes and nightmares, ambitions and failures'' of a generation whose only unifying characteristic may be its opposition to any definitions an outsider might impose. This is a fiendishly difficult project, but at first, at least, the movement was so small, and so site-specific, that Chang finds it easy enough to circumscribe: ''It may be hard to imagine now,'' he writes, ''but dur... ... middle of paper ... ... that remain to tie the hip-hop generation together. (In the words of a graffiti writer and activist Chang approvingly quotes, ''Young people are noticing that the only thing that can't be bought, sold, co-opted or marketed anymore is substantive political organizing and dissent.'') Whether or not this is true -- and I've met a few politicians who'd argue the point -- it makes you wonder what today's young people are supposed be organizing for, or dissenting against. Is it the World Trade Organization? Police brutality? The military-industrial complex? Fox News? The New York Times? Looking at the last image in Chang's book (it's a two-page photo spread of a multicultural crowd raising their fists into the air at the 2000 Democratic Convention), I couldn't, for the life of me, figure out what what they were protesting. I wasn't sure anyone in attendance knew, either.

Open Document