This is hydroboration oxidation of an olefin-octyl alcohol reaction. It is a two steps reaction, first hydroboration then oxidation. First, borane(BH3) come in add to the carbon double bond in 1-octene, which transfer boron to one carbon as graph showed and the hydrogen atom to the adjust carbon. This break the carbon double bond and C-H, C-B bonds form at the same time. Repeat this process for two more times to reach with each B-H bond, form trioctylborane. Next, oxidation step. Hydrogen peroxide was deprotonated by OH- group become nucleophilic hydroperoxide anion since conjugated base is better nucleophile. Nucleophilic hydroperoxide anion attack the electrophilic boron atom (BR3) to leave boron atom a negative charge. Then the electrons between R-B migrate to oxygen which break R-B and O-O bond and form R-O bond1. After three times which boron bond with three –OR group, become to trialkyl borate B(OR)3. Attacking of H+as nucleophile withelectrophilic B(OR)3 to form alcohol 1-Octanol and B(OH)3.
Ratio of 1-octene with respect to borane-THF is 3:1. Boron atom bonds to three hydrogen atoms before reaction, three carbon double bond from three octane are needed to successfully react with each B-H bond. The π bond act as nucleophilic and reach with electrophilic B.
Hydroboration reaction proceed both regioselectivity and stereochemistry. Regioselectivity anti-Markovnikov occurred which means hydrogen adds to the less substituted carbon, this occurred because boron atom is electrophile. Stereochemistry sys occurred means hydrogen and boron atom add to the same face of alkene because C-B and C-H bonds form immediately from BH32.
Data and results (see attachment for labelled chemical structure)
Wavelength (cm-1 ) Functional grou...
... middle of paper ...
...needed and they will dry out in the end. If unreacted boranecomplex contained in the final produce can cause source of impurity and higher percent yield. During extraction, the product may not extract completely from the solution, do one more time of diethyl ether extraction to give as many product as possible which can give a higher percent yield.
Conclusion
In conclusion, final product 1-octanol was produced from the hydroboration-oxidation of an olefin-octyl alcohol reaction with starting material 1-octene with boranetetrahydrofuran solution. Final product had 0.0049g collected give 2.81% percent yield and. Proton NMR of starting material and product, IR spectrum were detected and analyst. Overall, the experiment was successful since product proton NMR peaks were labelled clearly and functional groups were found in IR spectrum, except percent yield was very low.
The percent yield of products that was calculated for this reaction was about 81.2%, fairly less pure than the previous product but still decently pure. A carbon NMR and H NMR were produced and used to identify the inequivalent carbons and hydrogens of the product. There were 9 constitutionally inequivalent carbons and potentially 4,5, or 6 constitutionally inequivalent hydrogens. On the H NMR there are 5 peaks, but at a closer inspection of the product, it seems there is only 4 constitutionally inequivalent hydrogens because of the symmetry held by the product and of this H’s. However, expansion of the peaks around the aromatic region on the NMR show 3 peaks, which was suppose to be only 2 peaks. In between the peaks is a peak from the solvent, xylene, that was used, which may account to for this discrepancy in the NMR. Furthermore, the product may have not been fully dissolved or was contaminated, leading to distortion (a splitting) of the peaks. The 2 peaks further down the spectrum were distinguished from two H’s, HF and HE, based off of shielding affects. The HF was closer to the O, so it experienced more of an up field shift than HE. On the C NMR, there are 9 constitutionally inequivalent carbons. A CNMR Peak Position for Typical Functional Group table was consulted to assign the carbons to their corresponding peaks. The carbonyl carbon, C1, is the farthest up field, while the carbons on the benzene ring are in the 120-140 ppm region. The sp3 hybridized carbon, C2 and C3, are the lowest on the spectrum. This reaction verifies the statement, ”Measurements have shown that while naphthalene and benzene both are considered especially stable due to their aromaticity, benzene is significantly more stable than naphthalene.” As seen in the reaction, the benzene ring is left untouched and only the naphthalene is involved in the reaction with maleic
Depending on which face of carbonyl the hydride attacks, the ketone could result in two different diastereomers of product. Since the two ketone faces are nonequivalent, there will be stereo selectivity in reduction which means that one diastereomer will be more prevalent than the other. There are three reduction conditions can be used to reduce the 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone : NaBH4, MPV , and L-selectride. For NaBH4, the hydride attach itself to the carbonyl oxygen to become the hydroxyl group and it more likely from the top because the hydride isn’t blocked by a bulky group (Fig mech prez). Both sodium borohydride and lithium aluminum hydride are less bulky hydride reducing agents so it is expected that they will be able to attack from the top face of the molecule since the bulky tert-butyl group will not hinder the attack. For L-selectride mechanism is similar to NaBH4, the L-selectride is a source of hydride for the carbonyl oxygen but there are bulky groups that block the hydride. Since L-selectride is much larger and bulkier hydride reagent so likely not be able to attack from the top face in the presence of the bulky tert-butyl group (fig 1 and 2 like web) For MPV, the ketone is reduced with aluminum isopropoxide in isopropanol. The carbonyl oxygen attack the aluminum which causes the carbonyl oxygen to have a +1 charge, a hydrogen as
In a separate beaker, acetone (0.587 mL, 8 mmol) and benzaldehyde (1.63 mL, 16 mmol) were charged with a stir bar and stirred on a magnetic stirrer. The beaker mixture was slowly added to the Erlenmeyer flask and stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Every 10 minutes, a small amount of the reaction mixture was spotted on a TLC plate, with an eluent mixture of ethyl acetate (2 mL) and hexanes (8 mL), to monitor the decrease in benzaldehyde via a UV light. When the reaction was complete, it was chilled in an ice bath until the product precipitated, which was then vacuum filtrated. The filter cake was washed with ice-cold 95% ethanol (2 x 10 mL) and 4% acetic acid in 95% ethanol (10 mL). The solid was fluffed and vacuum filtrated for about 15 minutes. The 0.688 g (2.9 mmol, 36.8%, 111.3-112.8 °C) product was analyzed via FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopies, and the melting point was obtained via
Hydration of alkenes is characterized by the addition of water and an acid-catalyst to a carbon-carbon bond leading to an alcohol. Dehydration is exactly the opposite in which dehydration of an alcohol requires water to be removed from the reactant. Equilibrium is established between the two processes when the rate of the forward reaction equals the rate of the reverse reaction. The alkene that is used in this experiment is norbornene. Through hydration of norbornene, an alcohol group should be present on the final product yielded what is known as exo-norborneol. Percent yield is a numerical indication of how much of the reactant was actually reacted to yield product. The equation for percent yield is shown below:
A convenient method of separating a mixture of organic compounds is recognized as liquid-liquid extraction, which involves the dispersion of a substance between two immiscible solvents using preferential solubility. Strategically using the differences in solubility of the interested solute, the compound can be transferred from one liquid part to the other during extraction. Organic acids and bases can be separated from each other by using an organic solvent like diethyl ether and a polar solvent such as water. Diethyl ether is an appropriate solvent since it wil...
In this lab 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone is reduced by sodium borohydride (NaBH4) to produce the cis and trans isomers of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanol. Since the starting material is a ketone, NaBH4 is strong enough to perform a reduction and lithium aluminum hydride is not needed. NaBH4 can attack the carbonyl group at an equatorial (cis) or axial (trans) position, making this reaction stereoselective. After the ketone is reduced by the metal-hydride, hydrochloric acid adds a proton to the negatively charged oxygen to make a hydroxyl group. The trans isomer is more abundant than the cis based on the results found in the experiment and the fact that the trans isomer is more stable; due to having the largest functional groups in equatorial positions.
Purpose/Introduction: In this experiment, four elimination reactions were compared and contrasted under acidic (H2SO4) and basic (KOC(CO3)3) conditions. Acid-catalyzed dehydration was done on 2-butanol and 1-butanol; a 2o and 1o alcohol, respectively. The base-induced dehydrobromination was performed on 2-bromobutane and 1-bromobutane isomeric halides. The stereochemistry and regiochemistry of the four reactions were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) to determine product distribution (assuming that the amount of each product in the gas mixture is proportional to the area under its complementary GC peak).
The 1H NMR spectrum shows that there are 18 protons in 11 different proton environments. This fits with the Diels-Alder reaction taking place a...
The goal of this experiment is to determine which products are formed from elimination reactions that occur in the dehydration of an alcohol under acidic and basic conditions. The process utilized is the acid-catalyzed dehydration of a secondary and primary alcohol, 1-butanol and 2-butanol, and the base-induced dehydrobromination of a secondary and primary bromide, 1-bromobutane and 2-bromobutane. The different products formed form each of these reactions will be analyzed using gas chromatography, which helps understand stereochemistry and regioselectivity of each product formed.
yield of the pure product was determined to be 95.42%. PURPOSE The purpose of this lab was to perform an electro-philic aromatic substitution and determine the identity of the major product. TLC was used to detect unreacted starting material or isomeric products present in the reaction mixture. RESULTS The theoretical yield of the m-nitrobenzoate was determined to be 4.59 grams.
As a final point, the unknown secondary alcohol α-methyl-2-naphthalenemethanol had the R-configuration since it reacted the fastest with S-HBTM and much slower with R-HBTM. TLC was a qualitative method and ImageJ served as a quantitative method for determining which reaction was the faster esterification. Finally, 1H NMR assisted in identifying the unknown from a finite list of possible alcohols by labeling the hydrogens to the corresponding peaks.
Enantiomers, a type of isomer, are non-superimposable, mirror images of each other. Diasteriomers, another type of isomer, are non-superimposable, non-mirror images of each other. Dimethyl maleate and dimethyl fumarate are diasteriomers, as they are not mirror images but instead vary in the orientation of the carbomethoxy groups around the double bond. Dimethyl maleate is the cis-isomer because both groups are on the same side and dimethyl fumarate is the trans-isomer because the two groups are on opposite sides. A bromine free radical mechanism was required for this conversion. First, energy from light is required to create two bromine free radicals from Br2. Then one of the free radicals attacks the double bond in dimethyl maleate, breaking it and creating a carbon radical on the other carbon. The bond then rotates and reforms, freeing the bromine radical and creating the trans-isomer, dimethyl fumarate. Bromine in this reaction is acting as a catalyst in this reaction and then cyclohexane is added at the end to neutralize the bromine free radicals. The activation reaction of the radical reaction is lower than the activation energy of the addition reaction, which is why it occurred more quickly. This reaction was successful because the percent yield was 67.1%, which is greater that 65%. It also demonstrated the expected principles, as the reaction did not occur without the presence of both light and bromine. The dimethyl fumarate had a measured boiling point of 100C to 103C, which is extremely close to the expected boiling point of 102C to
Benzyl bromide, an unknown nucleophile and sodium hydroxide was synthesized to form a benzyl ether product. This product was purified and analyzed to find the unknown in the compound. A condenser and heat reflux was used to prevent reagents from escaping. Then the solid product was vacuum filtered.
The light provides the energy to break the bond between the two bromine atoms, creating the bromine radicals. The energy required to break the bond is known as the bond dissociation energy. The bromine radicals can then attack the hydrocarbons, creating carbon radicals and HBr. These carbon radicals in turn attack the bromine that is not in radical form, which results in the creation of the R-Br products and regeneration of bromine radicals. This allows the reaction to continue though propagation. Different hydrogen atoms demonstrate different reactivity depending on the stability of the different transition states that are formed with the carbon radical
Since 1-octanol was the least polar among 3 alcohols used in this part, so it was found to be insoluble in water but soluble in hexane. This was due to the longer chain of carbons makes compounds more hydrocarbon-like.