Criticism Of A Doll's House

2083 Words5 Pages

A Doll’s House is a modern drama written in 1879 by Henrick Ibsen that takes place in Norway during Christmas time. According to Kate Millett Ibsen is the first writer since the “Greeks to challenge the myth of male dominance,” (Durbach5) which is clearly demonstrated in this particular drama. The plays protagonist is Nora Helmer who is being blackmailed for a past decision. Nora, had to get enough money in order to take a trip to Italy that would save her husband’s life, without him knowing. The intent of this drama was to show the obligations and the role that a woman plays, specifically relating to her family. Henrik’s character, Nora Helmer has stirred up some major controversy. Critics disagree on if Nora Helmer is a good or a bad wife …show more content…

In her article she speaks about what the social norm was during the time of A Doll’s House. She states that many people write Nora off because, “no true mother leaves her children, under any circumstances. If she does, she is a monster” (Brooks14). Brooks goes on to talk about how Nora’s children would have been better off in her care than her husband, which is widely argued by many critics. She believes that by the end of the play there is no reason to think that the children would have been better off in the care of Torvald, due to the fact that he has “revealed how weak and selfish he is” (Brooks14). Additionally, Brooks disagrees with the statement that Nora does not care about her children. She believes that Nora, distances herself from her children due to the fear that she is “infecting” her children with “moral sickness” …show more content…

One source of symbolism is the macaroons that Nora eats despite her husband Torvald’s wishes. Durbach, believes that the macaroons symbolize the childish games that Nora plays with her husband along with the web of lies Nora has become tangled up in, and her unhappy marriage. Another critic, Drake, believes symbols such as the Christmas tree, the doors in the house, the house itself, and the game, work “collectively to constitute a coherent and extensive image network to the drama” (Drake3). Once again, Drake believes the game of hide-and-seek that Nora plays with her children symbolizes her childish behavior as does Durbach. However, Durbach states specifically that it protects the “pecuniary secret she has concealed from her husband” (Drake3). Drake believes the “desperate” game of hide-and-seek is to prevent Torvald from discovering who she really received the money from, so that they would be able to travel to Italy for a year for the medical treatment that Torvald needed in order to continue

Open Document