Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inventions during world war 2
Inventions during world war 2
Inventions during world war 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inventions during world war 2
Heinz Guderian
Heinz Guderian was the father of a world changing military strategy that used rapid advancing armored units in World War II. He pushed hard for the idea that tanks should not only be used to support infantry but should be the “speerspitze” or spearhead of the German armed forces (Alexander pg 31). This strategy named Blitzkrieg or “lightening war” in English was the complete reverse of traditional military thinking in the first part of the 20th century. His military strategy would to lead the German army into stunning victory and would cause the allies reeling to catch up. Heinz Guderian’s blitzkrieg was almost lost in pages of history do to the extreme disapproval in the German high command, only his resolve and complete dedication to this revolutionary idea would keep it alive.
Heinz Guderian was a German general in the Second World War, but the seeds of his idea were planted a decade earlier. Guderian in 1931 was promoted in rank and become the inspector of the Motorized troops in the German Army. It was here that he began his studies of the tank and its potential on the battlefield. He gained confidence in his idea with the readings of English military strategist like Basil Liddell Hart and John Fuller. These men viewed tanks much like Napoleon Bonaparte’s use of his Calvary; these fast moving men on horseback would work their way into the rear of the enemy causing the line to decay and fail. This concept was applied to the tank and Guderian saw the future of warfare as fast paced decisive combat. He saw that advancements in technology since World War I enabled the ability for fast moving armored units to be supported from the air and thus giving them the scope, and range to move deep into enemy territory(Ail...
... middle of paper ...
...plans and tactics were used was from is utmost dedication and resolve in the face of adversity.
Works Cited
Ailsby, Christopher. The Third Reich Day by Day. St. Paul, MN: Zenith Press, 2001. Print.
Alexander, Bevin. Inside the Nazi War Machine: How Three Generals Unleashed Hitler's Blitzkrieg upon the World. NAL Caliber, 2010. Print.
Boot, Max. War Made New: Weapons, Warriors, and the Making of the Modern World. Gotham, 2007. Print.
Foley, Robert T. World Wars: Blitzkrieg. Web. Feb. & March 2014. .
Jackson, Julian. THE FALL OF FRANCE the Nazi Invasion of 1940. Oxford University, 2003. Print.
Shaw, Antony. World War II Day by Day. Paul, MN: Zenith Press, 2000. Print.
2014: History Channel, Blitzkrieg- World War II. Web. Feb. & March 2014.
.
This new technological development defines the emergence of universal/total war that changed the field of combat before and during WWI. This piece was obviously painted in 1911 right before WWI, but it presents the historical change from horse-driven combat to the more industrialized methods of canon warfare. By WWI, the rise of tanks and artillery made the French Calvary obsolete, and it gave rise to the modern French infantry. Much like Levinthal’s photographic depiction of tanks and soldiers in WWII, the development of those technologies are defined in Fresnaye’s acute sense of movement in military maneuvers. The use of artillery in WWI would now make it possible to kill hundreds of thousands of soldiers with more advanced industrial development of machine technology. Certainly, Fresnaye is depicting the power and masculinity of the French infantry in terms of the coming devastation that WWI would bring to Europe. The use of artillery was a major change in the field of combat during WWI, which defined the horrors of universal war in the modern psyche. Fresnaye’s cubism illustrates the advancing modernism of early 20th century warfare in the angular and geometric depiction of men and artillery as a new phenomenon in the art world. Certainly, Fresnaye’s painting illustrates the modern psyche of total/universal war in the depiction of modern
Koch, H. The Hitler Youth: Origins and Development 1922-1945. New York: Cooper Square Press, 1975. Print.
In order to receive a victory in the Battle of the Bulge, General Patton used Mission Command Analysis in order to understand how he can be successful for this mission. The first thing of understanding t...
Cameron, R. S. (2003). The army vision: The 4th AD in world war II. Military Review, 83(6), 59-68
...ced to retreat or be cut off from their supplies. The German High Command, at this point, knew that they could no longer continue to fight and needed to surrender or face annihilation.
Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis: To find out how men who are faced with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking “to catch a glimpse of the face of battle.”
Johnson, David E. Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers: Innovation in the U.S. Army, 1917-1945. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998. Print.
Koehn, Ilse. Mischling, Second Degree: My Childhood in Nazi Germany. New York: Greenwillow Books, 1977.
Furthermore the development of tactics such as the introduction of creeping barrages, in-depth defence, tanks and gas complimented the home front campaign creating a 'war of attrition'. General Sixt von Armin acknowledges the impact of attrition into the development of in-depth tactics to create limit losses and aid the firepower.
The GI Offensive in Europe by Peter Mansoor is a fresh examination of the United States’ infantry divisions who served in the European Theatre of Operations during WWII. Mansoor’s approach is aggressive and direct as he challenges the time honored and accepted assertions of S.L.A. Marshall, Martin Van Crevald, Russell Weighley and Trevor Dupuy in that the Allies were victorious merely because of the overwhelmingly vast amount of materials thrust at the Germans by soldiers of inferior training. While his writing is geared towards those with at least basic military knowledge, it is still engaging to the average lay person. He provides a new conclusion on how and why the American combat forces were successful in defeating the Germans in Europe. He accomplishes this through extensive self conducted research backed by his own personal experiences as a military commander.
Warfare was in a state of transition. Older commanders and generals in the French and British militaries were very cavalry and infantry focused. These commanders believed that cavalry, infantry, and artillery would assure victory in any circumstance, against any foe. They clung to the static tactics of the bygone World War I era. World War I had been fought primarily on French soil, and the military as well as the government never wanted that to happen again, therefore they wanted to reinforce their main border against any future German. Little did they know that only twenty two years later they would be bested by German forces in a way that would shock the world. This research will be analyzing many important assumptions, oversights,...
For instance, the Germans emphasized on staff balance and operational flexibility without necessarily having concrete coordination.This was not imaginable in an era where technology and communication was not advanced. The central position of Germany is also looked into while analyzing the German art of war. Like Persia, Germany’s central position, its scarcity of resourcesand its engagement in short wars also led to the success with its offensive approach. Citino notes that these short wars enabled the Germans to be agile and quick while attacking with fearlessness. While this tactic enabled the Germans to have operational maneuver, they had to act aggressively and take up the earliest opportunity to attack the opponent to
Zink, Harold. (1957) The United States in Germany, 1944-1955 [online]. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand [cited 12th September 2011]. Available from:
Gascoigne, Bamber. "World War II - The Blitz." History World. (2001): n. page. Web. 29 Sep. 2011. .
Rosenbaum, Ron. Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil. New York: Random House, 1998. Print.