Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
cross-price elasticity of demand
Natural gas ________.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: cross-price elasticity of demand
Heating Commodities
Back in the middle of October, the price of natural-gas had risen
because a gas company was forced to shut down a pipeline due to the need for
repairs. This impending shortage led to the decrease in prices for other
heating commodities, as well as larger profits. The demand for energy was
becoming greater and greater because it was that time of year when consumers
began storing energy in their homes to prepare for the cold winter months ahead.
The four commodities mentioned in this article, crude oil, heating oil,
gasoline and natural gas are all substitutes for one another. This is true
because the cross elasticity of demand states that as the percentage change in
the quantity demanded of one commodity results from a one percent change in the
price of another commodity. In other words, the increase in demand for crude
oil, gasoline, and heating oil was the outcome of the price increase in natural
gas.
As shown in the graph below, the cross elasticity of demand is direct
(positive). As the price of natural increases, the quantity demanded for the
three other energy commodities increase.
The market system today functions on price. Consumers make their
decision on what to buy by the price of their desired good. Naturally,
consumers will choose the lower price of a commodity they wish to purchase.
This is why consu...
On the 9th of February 2004 TransCanada Corporation, an energy company based in Alberta, Canada proposed a plan for the installation and use of a pipeline that would stretch from Alberta, Canada to oil refineries in the Gulf Coast of Texas in the United States. The pipeline, titled the Keystone Pipeline, would be installed in four separate phases and once completed would transport up to 1.1 million barrels of synthetic crude oil per day. Phases two through four of the pipeline encompass the parts of the pipeline that would be installed in the United States and would be located in the states of North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Missouri, and Illinois. TransCanada is currently awaiting approval from the US government in order to begin the installation of the US portion of the pipeline.
The Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL Pipeline are two pipeline projects that were suspended in the past. These pipelines were stopped because they could have a big impact of people and the environment. The making of these pipelines would cause a great amount of carbon pollution. Recently, President Trump signed the orders to approve the pipeline project. The projects have pros and cons, the people in favor of the pipelines think we would be able to rely less on foreign oil. The people against the pipeline believe that the pipelines would cause the release of gases into the air that could be harmful for other people.
...e hazardous to the environment. The government will be forced to incur the cost of environmental damage brought about by increased use of fossil fuel in the country. The money could have been used to invest in other sectors of the economy. Similarly, the pipeline will increase the level of unemployment in the country. This is because construction of the pipeline will force most workers to lose their jobs. This will in turn add to the number of the already existing unemployed people in the country.
The opening stories on CNS and FOX on the topic of the pipeline are in support for Obama’s decision against the pipeline. The coverage over the controversy is very one sided and mainly talks about the negative effects of letting the pipeline pass through Montana, South D...
The newest proposed phase has been met with mixed feelings. Many companies in industry wish to see the newest phase of the pipeline completed because many believe that it would be very beneficial to almost everyone. One of the biggest benefits that the construction of a new section of pipeline would provide is the large amount of jobs that it would create. The...
Recently, TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline has become a hot debate topic. Those who oppose the Western United States oil pipeline are misled and uniformed. The US Government should authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline that would import tar sand oil from Canada. The pipeline would generate jobs and help to remove foreign oil dependency, is the safest transportation option being considered and finally will not harm or affect the environment as opponents claim.
The proponents of the pipeline include TransCanada, other companies that will connect into the pipeline to transport their product and companies that will benefit financially from the construction of the pipeline. Persons that will benefit from present and future employment also support the pipeline. Opponents include environmentalists and landowners along the path. The ethical dilemma is that companies, including TransCanada, have the right to operate and transport their product to market so they can generate a profit. The health and future of these companies and the jobs people enjoy from employment with them are at risk. The affected landowners have rights due to ownership. The environment should be protected
The main issue discussed in the article is TransCanada's change of strategy, regarding new developments in their seven year battle to gain approval for the construction of the Keystone pipeline. Previously former Republican governor Dave Heineman had given TransCanada a route and eminent domain rights in Nebraska to build their pipeline. Due
In an expanded view the pipeline is very beneficial to the world but we are not talking about the world view. Much of the profit that would be made from the pipeline will be made in either in a foreign country or in a foreign state. And because all the profit that could be made will be made in a far off place, we are left will a lot of risk and little reward. The pipeline will be transporting several chemicals that are lethal to crops and people. According to the Bluegrass pipeline website one of the chemicals that are being tra...
First, with the Keystone XL pipeline being built, it is not good for the environment. There is a chance that the pipeline could have a leak and cause problems. According to Fox
The need for energy and resources pertaining to the United States is an inevitable concept that has caused much confusion and debate, especially over the last several years with the economy struggling to thrive. There are many ways to solving this problem of confusion, but perhaps the most debated at this point and time is the decision whether or not to build the Keystone Pipeline XL. The Keystone Pipeline would solve many of these problems and bring economical peace to the United States through distribution and refining of the oil. Even though there are many hesitations about the completion of the Keystone XL pipeline, it should be built because it would create new economic growth, make the United States less dependent
“No oil pipeline can 100% guarantee a leak- or spill free operation” says Matt Clarke. Granted that, no promise can be made that will assure the water will remain clean and not negatively affect the surrounding land and people consuming the water. Clarke also discusses that almost all pipelines are made out of cheap carbon steel and sealed with protectants. They rely on the protectants rather than using a more structurally sound stainless steel, thus proving that companies are more interested in saving money than they are making a safer pipeline. Next, in the article “On Pipelines, Oil, and Risk”, Matt Clarke also states that most pipeline companies depend on their crew to clean up the mess. Yet the spill in Kalamazoo River from 2010 is still being cleaned to this day. The companies are assuring a cleanup plan for a “just in-case”, but they aren’t concluding that it could take several of years, and it’s possible that their water will never be 100%
According to attorney Jan Hasselman, restraining orders were placed on the company placing the pipeline to stop construction before it could reach the site of the ancient burial ground, but the next day, the company bulldozed the entire area of burial grounds despite the restraining order (Democracy Now!). The action of bulldozing the ancient burial grounds of the Sioux Tribe has caused great disruption among the tribe members and protesters alike, and this destruction also brought in tribes from Montana, a very rare occurrence for separate tribes to unite (Democracy Now!). It is also, by law, illegal to disturb a person’s gravesite in the state of North Dakota, the location of part reservation that the pipeline will be constructed, without lawful permission. If the crime of grave destruction occurs, the person or persons responsible for the act are charged with various degrees of felonies (Care and Custody of Dead). The Sioux Tribe was given the land they have in North Dakota as a safe place to live and bury their people, and now it is being disturbed by the creation of the pipeline. If the people have laws to abide by for their own burial grounds inside the state, the Sioux Tribe should have the same rights, and the company constructing the pipeline have disobeyed the laws of North Dakota burial
First, for transportation across Asia Pacific and Europe where there is high market demand for oil. The pipeline thus represents the tactical part of business solution for effective use of Caspian Sea Oil. Second, the predictions and forecasts about the demands and supply of oil and its pricing are not accurate enough and might cause wrong decisions and conclusions and so without Caspian Sea Oil supply, the companies cannot have sufficient supply for market. Third, is the political issue with the US since the disintegration of Soviet Union in 1991.The United States wanted to influence events and leaders in the region and even the Russians and the Iranians wished for the
From the 1970s to the 1990s, pipelines became far more versatile than before. More pipelines were being used to transport natural gas, such as carbon dioxide for oil recovery and other natural gas liquids for a growing heating industry. Pipelines were being constructed to gather oil and gases more than a mile beneath the bottom of the