Headquaters vs. Hindquarters: Gender Differences in College Hookup Culture Participation

901 Words4 Pages
College campus cultures have moved away from dating and seeking committed relationships, and shifted toward “hooking up.” This hookup culture involves people engaging in casual sex without commitment or “strings attached.” Is this culture driven by the headquarters or the hindquarters? What is left to question about the new found culture on college campuses are the differences in sexual motivations and satisfactions between the genders and subsequently how they react after. Both men and women do partake in the newly found hookup culture, but there are questions that are hidden underneath the rug are. Do men and women have different motivations and expectations? Are men and women satisfied by different things? Does hooking up affect men and women differently? Although many people believe that hookup culture has turned college-aged women to pursue casual sex as much as men, the reality is however, that it is men who have the desire more for casual sex, while women are still pursuing committed relationships.
Traditionally, it has been men that people think of as the driving force behind the pursuit of casual sex relationships. But with the women today receiving higher degrees and striving for greater prestige in the work force, some believe that women are equally behind the wheel of hookup culture. There is doubt that women participate in casual sex, but what do they really want? All the road signs point something including commitment, love, or romance.
College men, many known to be “frat stars,” are notoriously known for wanting to hook up. Men find many aspects of hooking up advantageous over actual dating. When guys are dating girls, it typically requires them to first work up the nerve to ask a girl out on a date, which brings...

... middle of paper ...

...adshaw, Carolyn, Arnold S. Kahn, and Bryan K. Saville. “To Hook Up or Date: Which Gender Benefits?” Sex Roles 62.9-10 (2010): 661–669. CrossRef. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
Townsend, John M., and Timothy H. Wasserman. "Sexual Hookups Among College Students: Sex Differences in Emotional Reactions." Archives of Sexual Behavior 40.6 (2011): 1173-181. ProQuest. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
Duffy, J. Emmett, and Martin Thiel. Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems. Oxford University Press, 2007. CrossRef. Web. 5 Mar. 2014.
Taylor, Kate. “Sex on Campus: She Can Play That Game, Too.” The New York Times 12 July 2013. NYTimes.com. Web. 9 Apr. 2014.
Fielder, Robyn L., and Michael P. Carey. “Predictors and Consequences of Sexual ‘Hookups’ among College Students: A Short-Term Prospective Study.” Archives of sexual behavior 39.5 (2010): 1105–1119. PubMed Central. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.

    More about Headquaters vs. Hindquarters: Gender Differences in College Hookup Culture Participation

      Open Document