Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effects of homophobia essay
legislation discrimination against transgenders
effects of hate crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effects of homophobia essay
Nowadays Donald Trump’s speeches are noticed in the world because of the hate they are instilled with. Hate speech is defined as “[S]peech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability”(Dictionary.com, 2016). Hate speeches affect many different types of people; many of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people are target of hate speech, and a public has demanded that homophobic hate speech disappear.
Homophobic hate speech not only hurts LGBT people’s feelings but also threatens their lives. Hate speech urges some anti-homosexual people to be aggressive towards LGBT people, resulting in them hiding their
…show more content…
However, homophobic hate speech causes several negative effects. In fact, after Mr. Sekaleshfer’s speech, 49 gay people were killed in Florida in 2016 by an Islamic state supporter. LGBT people are harmed because of hate speech as such it can call to violent action.
One of solution is to change social standards; it means making LGBT a more common and accepted orientation. For example, in some countries there are laws stating LGBT is a crime; making it legal, and also making pro same-sex marriage laws can help make homosexuality more common as people would not have to hide their identity. However, forcing people to accept LGBT will create protests. In fact, according to Towleroad writer Fitzgerald Michael (2016), the Taiwanese government is currently trying to legalize same-sex marriage, causing gatherings of 80,000 people, in which some expressed hate towards the LGBT community. A lot of laws are based on local cultures and religion thus making it difficult to such
…show more content…
In Canada, there is limitation on speech, and when people say or write anything homophobic, it is illegal (Stefanowicz, 2015). Thought it might reduce hate speech, this potentially violates the freedom of expression. In 2014 anti-abortion and anti-gay activist Bill Whatcott distributed leaflets against homosexuality and abortion at the University of Regina. At the time, he said that his goal was securing a “robust level of free speech for my social conservative brethren” (Takeuchi, 2015). This solution also causes suppression views on the opposite side resulting in strong
A hate crime is defined as “a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving violence” (Oxford Dictionaries). Matthew Shepard’s death caused great disorder in Laramie, despite the fact that it was originally an unknown town. In a sense, Laramie itself has changed due to the media attention of this event. Hate was originally “not a Laramie value” (Kaufman 15), but after this hate crime, the public has great sympathy for Matthew Shepard and distrust towards Laramie’s people. Even with all the support as well as the parade for Shepard, it is quite disappointing that there weren’t any regulations or protection offered to homosexuals, bisexuals, or transgender, after this crime.
This same person may be a powerful political figure with a bias against men and be using derogatory and aggressive behavior but we do not call them out on this hate speech in fear that they may call their opponents NAZIs and fascists for not supporting their cause but in modern day society this is not “hate speech” but rather freedom of speech. Hate speech is not a constant in society and the culture itself may be prejudiced but the society does not see this as such and believes it to be ‘equality”. Well with freedom of speech, controversy can be combated when both sides have the ability to speak and come to a solution and discover if something is hate speech in the modern political world. If the first amendment was to block hate speech, it would be nearly impossible for there to be an argument that can be resolved as just calling a person a hate speech promoter is a slander and would be used to discredit a person without proper
“Fag burns.” “DIE.” These slurs were scrawled outside the GLBT office at N.C. State last October. Should the instigator be indicted for hate speech in addition to vandalism? Was this expression an act of hate speech? Or was it free speech? Is the message he conveyed protected under the First Amendment? Two and a half centuries ago, the nation’s forefathers drafted the Constitution of the United States. The aim of the Constitution is to protect the values that this nation was built upon. This document, arguably one of the nation’s most important, encompasses values such as democracy, equality, religious tolerance, as well as the freedom of speech.
The NBA’s all time total point scorer turned out to be an advanced columnist. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's argument on political hate crimes is rich in evidence and support. In this article Kareem explains his side that politicians under the guise of patriotism publically commit hate crimes. Kareem explains the definition of a hate crime in being “the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious, sexual orientation, or disability.” He then uses a prime example, current republican candidate Donald Trump. Throughout Trumps current run for presidency he has been getting known for his hate speech towards women and many different ethnicities.
Living in the United States we enjoy many wonderful freedoms and liberties. Even though most of these freedoms seem innate to our lives, most have been earned though sacrifice and hard work. Out of all of our rights, freedom of speech is perhaps our most cherished, and one of the most controversial. Hate speech is one of the prices we all endure to ensure our speech stays free. But with hate speeches becoming increasingly common, many wonder if it is too great of a price to pay, or one that we should have to pay at all.
During the 20th century, many civil rights acts came into play in hopes of creating more equality, such as the right to vote, attend school with the white children and geographical area to live in for the African Americans. Towards the end of the 20th century, biased motivated crimes increased. President Roosevelt prompted the change and the civil rights Act of 1957. This act prohibited any individual from infringing on their right to vote. During this time, it also brought light to the investigations of hate crime and bias motived crimes. Congress passed the Hate Crime Statistics Act to assist in reporting official statistics of crime in America. The collection of data came from the Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (Lawrence, 2002). Once the data began to demonstrate perceived bias crimes, concern grew and it was recognized as a social problem in the United States. It is difficult to compare the data retrieved during 20th century because prior to this time there was no data collected.
When the topic of hate and bias crime legislation is brought up two justifications commonly come to mind. In her article entitled “Why Liberals Should Hate ‘Hate Crime Legislation” author Heidi M. Hurd discusses the courts and states views that those who commit hate and bias crimes ought to be more severely punished. She takes into consideration both sides of the argument to determine the validity of each but ultimately ends the article in hopes to have persuaded the reader into understanding and agreeing with her view that laws concerning the punishment of hate and bias laws should not be codified. Hate crime is described as a violent, prejudice crime that occurs when a victim is targeted because of their membership in a specific group. The types of crime can vary from physical assault, vandalism, harassment or hate speech. Throughout the article Hurd tried to defend her view and explain why there should be no difference of punishment for similar crimes no matter the reason behind it. Her reason behind her article came from the law that President Obama signed in 2009 declaring that crimes committed with hatred or prejudice should have more sever punishments. While the court has their own views to justify their reasoning behind such decisions, in the article Hurd brings up points and facts to prove the wrongfulness of creating such a law. However, though Hurd has made her views clear in the following essay I will discuss reasons why the penalties are justifiable, why they should receive the same degree of punishment, less punishment and my personal view on the topic.
Hate speech is a very important topic, especially in the United States. Many do not know the thin line between criticisms and hate speech. One way criticism and hate speech differ is the intention of hate speech, if it was used purposely for “the stirring of hatred and hostility t...
...,1994:246-247. Geraci, Joseph and DonaldH. Mader. "Pedophillia." Encyclopedia of Homosexuality Ed. Wayne R Dynes. Garland Publishing, Inc , New York, 1990: v2, 964-970. Hamill, Pete. "Confessions of a Heterosexual." The Aims of Argument. A Rhetoric and Reader. 2nd Ed. Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Chanell: Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, California,1998: 531-536. Mohr, Richard D. "Gay Basics: Some Questions, Facts, and Values." Taking sides: Clashing Views on controversial Issues. Moral Issues. 4th Ed. Stephen Satris: The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc, Guilford,1994:186-194. Nickel, Jeffrey. "Everybody’s Threatened by Homophobia." The Aims of Argument. A Rhetoric and Reader.2nd Ed. Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Chanell: Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, California, 1998:527-530. Schuklenk,Udo and Tony Riley. "Homosexuality, Social Attitudes Toward." Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Editor-in -Chief Ruth Chadwick. Academic Press: San Diego, 1998: v2, 597-603. Ulanowsky, Carole. "The Family." Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Editor-in-Chief Ruth Chadwick. Academic Press: San Diego, 1998: v2,
...uld not allow this defense of extreme hatred to stand in cases involving attacks against gays. Homophobic hatred cannot be employed as an affirmative defense for criminal acts. Not only is this morally wrong, but the costs to the nation are simply too high if we allow juries with individual prejudices make such critical decisions. We still have a long way to go in the fight against homophobia, but the justice system can act as a catalyst in this process by refusing to allow this defense to exist. There must be an end to the use of the homosexual panic defense; it can no longer be used to excuse the brutality and murder in our society. Judges around the nation must follow the example of Judge Barton Voigt in Aaron McKinney's case and simply reject this specious defense. We should be proud of how far we've come but we must be aware that we still have a long way to go.
“Gender to skin color, the complexion of your pigment The same fight that led people to walk outs and sit ins It 's human rights for everybody, there is no difference. Live on and be yourself ” Gay rights is very similar to what African Americans had dealt with during the civil rights movement. No one should deal with being discriminated for being themselves and what they were born to be and to not worry what people think and just be yourself and embrace it. “When I was at church they taught me something else If you preach hate at the service those words aren 't anointed That holy water that you soak in has been poisoned” In church instead of preaching about love and worshiping the word of God they preach hate. “When everyone else is more comfortable remaining voiceless Rather than fighting for humans that have had their rights stolen might not be the same, but that 's not important. No freedom 'til we 're equal, damn right I support it” Individuals that are attacked about people for being gay sometimes just take it because they don’t want confrontation and feel discomfort. Everyone should have
Hate Crime in the United States of America THESIS: In this research paper, information will be given on hate crime in the United States of America. It’s best to know about these types of crimes before it’s too late because it’s rarely reported or spoken about but does occur on regular bases. Hate crime didn't come about until the early 1980's. It's sad how these types of crimes still occur so many years later; there are innocent people who are attacked simply because of their race, religion or sexual orientation. Based on the articles, hate crime in the USA is very common and the chances to be a victim are high enough. Hate crimes are ignorant and pointless, they need to be stopped.Done to many different people in many different waysHate crimes are biased motivated, they're based on ethnicity, gender, language, nationality, physical appearance and sexual orientation. Hate crimes have various ways of being committed. They can be done either by physically assaulting another individual, doing damage to their property, bullying them, harassing them, verbal abusing or insulting someone. Hate crimes occur because of people who are prejudice and ignorant who can’t understand that there are differences among people. A victim of hate crime is more than likely to be attacked by another individual because of their race. The most common type of hate crimes that are committed is racially motivated. While gay people are also attacked often also, hate crimes based on sexual orientation come in second. In 2012 and 2013 there were 42,236 reported hate crimes. 85% were race hate crimes, 10% were sexual orientation, 4% were disability and religion hate crimes and 1% transgender. The FBI has found that most hate crime offenders are white at 70%...
The First Amendment is known as the most protected civil liberty that protects our right to freedom of speech. There has been much controversy regarding hate speech and laws that prohibit it. These problems have risen from generation to generation and have been protested whether freedom of speech is guaranteed. According to our text book, By the People, hate speech is defined as “hostile statements based on someone’s personal characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.” Hate speech is a topic of issue for many people and their right’s, so the question is often proposed whether hate speech should be banned by government.
We believe that Violence and hate against homosexuality need to diminish severely. Gay bashing, gay bullying, and hate crime is very popular when it comes to hating on homosexual people. LGBT people of all ages die every year, whether caused by suicide, injury or homicide. From 1999-2010, the Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention program says that suicide is the 3rd leading cause (4,600 deaths) of death among young people ages 15 to 24. In 2011 there were 1,572 victims that received hate crimes based on sexual orientation. In an article on PBS, written by a woman named Karen Franklin, a description of an interview with a man called Brian states that him and his ...
Anti-Gay groups believe that homosexuals hold no right in our society. Hate groups often cite religion as the reason behind their actions and the source of their beliefs. Anti-Gay protest groups launch verbal and physical attacks on homosexuals creating hate posters that say “God hates fags”. Violent acts of hatred is not new to the world. Anti-gay groups believe that homosexuals are the root of all evil and unholy. Ide...