Hangers Executive Summary

1305 Words3 Pages

Introduction:
Joe Runyan-a tree hugger, the Hangers Cleaners’owner. Overcoming the competitors, he is the first person using the environmentally nontoxic dry cleaner in Kansas City. Founded in 2010, he has had 35 employees up to now and achieved the revenue of $1.6 million in 2015. This report plans to help Joe Runyan design an effective management accounting system.

Executive summary:
Hangers Cleaners’ competitive advantage, mission, and Key Success Factors (KSFs) are three tasks used to design business strategy. The purpose of this report is to align the importance of designing business strategy in MAS.

Hangers Cleaners’ mean of competitive advantage
A competitive advantage is used to support customers with either the greatest value …show more content…

They would be expenses, revenue budgets, purchases budgets, and production budgets. Budgeting would need to be flexible.
While other local dry cleaners have told him that their year-over-year revenue is flat or down as much as 25 percent, Mr. Runyan said his revenue grew 2 to 3 percent in 2015 and his profits quadrupled, largely as a result of closing the unprofitable location. They usually had special prices for customers. For example, they had had 20% off for new customer when they order the service last 2015.

Variance Analysis would be of limited use – what is the “output of a university? A student? An item of Research? How would “standards” for inputs be determined for these outputs against which variances could be calculated? E.g. what is the equivalent of “direct material” per student? A direct labour hour per student output?

You could discuss the usefulness of Cost Allocation and techniques in relation to developing budgets for Variance Analysis. It would be difficult to use traditional cost allocation techniques because of the problem in defining output, and inputs per unit of output. You could use the example of the Counselling Centre (a Kaye West Support Centre) to illustrate this …show more content…

How would you allocate discuss the difficulty in deciding on cost drivers for some would the cost drivers be for some

CVP analysis – may be useful for faculties to determine break even points in, say, numbers of students (but not for Support Centres as they have no revenue as such).

Target costing at a faculty or university level may be useful to determine cost budgets (remember fees at US universities are flexible, however they need to be very competitive, so target costing may well be relevant – Faculties could “work backwards” to determine target costs, based on a given fee structure).

Capital budgeting techniques would be critical, especially as part of the strategic planning process. It would be critical to include non-financial data in these decisions (i.e. the final decision should not be made solely on quantitative grounds – not a practice used by RMIT it seems). http://www.studocu.com/en-au/document/rmit/accounting-behaviour-and-organisations/tutorial-work/tutorial-work-topic-1/304457/view?auth=0&auth_prem=0&prem_doc=1

More about Hangers Executive Summary

Open Document