Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of hamlet by shakespeare
Shakespeare hamlet character analysis
Character analysis of hamlet by shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis of hamlet by shakespeare
In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the main character experiences many puzzling emotions. Readers usually ponder on who this man is and what exactly is going on inside his baffling mind. One of the most common debates is whether Hamlet was truly insane or just putting up a façade. Although the door may swing both ways, there is much evidence in the play to support that Hamlet deliberately feigned his insanity in order to bewilder the king and his attendants.
After seeing and speaking to his fathers’ ghost, Hamlet makes Horatio and Marcellus swear on his sword that they never speak of what they saw. Later on in the evening, Hamlet tells Horatio that he is going to “feign madness” (Act I, Scene V, line 166) so if he notices any strange behavior it is because he is putting on an act. Since Hamlet trusts and cares for Horatio, he lets him know of his plan so he doesn’t ask questions later. Hamlet also lets his mother know of his plot when he tells her that he is not mad, “but mad in craft” (Act III, Scene IV, line 188). Hamlet even claims that he is “mad north-north west” (Act II, Scene II, line 378). He is essentially saying that he is only crazy sometimes; other times he knows what’s what. When madness benefits him he will put on an “antic disposition” (Act I, Scene V, line 173) but when sanity proves worthy, he will regress back to being logical.
If one truly analyzes the play one will notice that Hamlet’s madness only manifests itself when he is around certain characters. Hamlet’s behavior differs when he is around people he trusts versus people he does not trust. His behavior is irrational when he is around Polonius, Claudius, Ophelia, Guildenstern, Rosencrantz, and Gertrude. However, when Hamlet is around Horatio, Bernardo, The ...
... middle of paper ...
...ld not go through this type of intricate mental thought. A mad individual would not contemplate this type of decision, they do things erratically and clearly Hamlet does not.
One could argue that Hamlet is truly insane, but that would mean ignoring the inconspicuous signals of his sanity. Hamlet is a character of both thought and power. His complex way of thinking and rationalizing is simply not comparable to an insane persons quick and careless judgment. Hamlet was able to discern his friends from his foes, to realize that the ghost could have played him, and to overcome his thoughts of suicide. These things could not have been accomplished if Hamlet had not been clear minded. The fact that Shakespeare made Hamlets insanity appear like true madness to countless readers today only goes to show the extent of his knowledge and the magnitude of his theatrical skill.
During the first act of the play, Hamlet tells Horatio “Here, as before, never, so help you mercy, how strange or odd soe'er I bear myself (As I perchance hereafter shall think meet to put an antic disposition on), that you, at such times seeing me, never shall—with arms encumbered thus, or this headshake” (I, ii, 170). Hamlet is telling Horatio that he is going to act crazy in order to lea...
In William Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, we, as readers, increasingly question the sanity of the protagonist, Hamlet, as the play continues. His seemingly psychotic banter with the other characters of the play begins to convince us that Hamlet is, indeed, insane. Hamlet, however, states, “How strange or odd soe’er I bear myself, as I perchance hereafter shall think meet to put an antic disposition on” (1.5.171). He specifically tells Horatio and Marcellus that he will be acting mad, as a front. Hamlet has an exceptional grasp on mental philosophy and the uses and effects of logic, more so than the other characters of the play. Because of this, Hamlet appears insane to others, but in fact remains true to his original statement of simply using an “antic disposition.”
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet undergoes a transformation from sane to insane while fighting madness to avenge his father’s death. The material that Shakespeare appropriated in writing Hamlet is the story of a Danish prince whose uncle murders the prince’s father, marries his mother, and claims the throne. The prince pretends to be feeble-minded to throw his uncle off guard, then manages to kill his uncle in revenge. Shakespeare changed the emphasis of this story entirely, making Hamlet a philosophically minded prince who delays taking action because his knowledge of his uncle’s crime is so uncertain. To begin with, Hamlet portrays himself as sane.
In Shakespeare’s play Hamlet the main character Hamlet experiences many different and puzzling emotions. He toys with the idea of killing himself and then plays with the idea of murdering others. Many people ask themselves who or what is this man and what is going on inside his head. The most common question asked about him is whether or not he is sane or insane. Although the door seems to swing both ways many see him as a sane person with one thought on his mind, and that is revenge. The first point of his sanity is while speaking with Horatio in the beginning of the play, secondly is the fact of his wittiness with the other characters and finally, his soliloquy.
Hamlet: Hamlet's Sanity & nbsp; & nbsp; “Great wits are sure to madness near allied, and thin partitions do. their bounds divide.” Though John Dryden's quote was not made in regard to William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it relates very well to the argument of whether or not Hamlet went insane. When a character such as Hamlet is under scrutiny, it can sometimes be difficult to determine what state he is in at. particular moments in the play.
Riddled with ambiguity by its very nature, the text of William Shakespeare's Hamlet has been a commonly debated subject in literary circles since its first performance. The character Hamlet undergoes intense physical and emotional hardship in his quest for revenge against his despicable uncle. This hardship, some argue, leads to an emotional breakdown and, ultimately, Hamlet's insanity. While this assessment may be suitable in some cases, it falls short in others. Since Hamlet is a play, the ultimate motivation of each of the characters borrows not only from the text, but also from the motivations of the actors playing the parts. In most respects, these motivations are more apt at discerning the emotional condition of a character than their dialogue ever could. Thus, the question is derived: In Kenneth Branagh's film adaptation of Hamlet, does the character Hamlet suffer from insanity? Giving halt to the response, this paper will first endeavor to establish what insanity is and will then provide sufficient examples both from the text, film, and Branagh's own musings on his motivations as proof that Hamlet's character, at least in Branagh's version of the play, is not insane.
As the play progresses, the reader may start to believe Hamlet “insane” act, but throughout the scenes, Hamlet shows that he knows right from wrong, good from bad, and his friends from his enemies. Hamlet shows that he still has power and control over his actions. As Elliot says “Hamlets madness is less than madness and more feigned”. Hamlet is portraying that of a mad man, in order to be free from questioning, thus allowing him have an easier path towards revenge. You can see this when Hamlet says “ I am but mad north-north-west. When the wind is southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw” (2.2.368-369) . This is an example of the “wing and whirling words” which Hamlet uses a few times throughout the play, with which Hamlet hopes to persuade people he is crazy. These words sh...
Throughout Shakespeare?s play, Hamlet, the main character, young Hamlet, is faced with the responsibility of attaining vengeance for his father?s murder. He decides to feign madness as part of his plan to gain the opportunity to kill Claudius. As the play progresses, his depiction of a madman becomes increasingly believable, and the characters around him react accordingly. However, through his inner thoughts and the apparent reasons for his actions, it is clear that he is not really mad and is simply an actor simulating insanity in order to fulfill his duty to his father.
This quote tells the reader that from now on Hamlet is going to act crazy so he can free his father's soul and he wants Horatio and other guards to promise on his sword that they will not speak a word of this incident. He is not crazy but if he were truly crazy then he would not internally realize that he is mad, a crazy person usually doesn't realize they are going crazy, but it is others who realize because of his or her actions. In Hamlet's case, Hamlet knows he is "crazy" and his acting is beneficial for him because he is able to talk freely without having to hold anything back. If Hamlet were truly insane it would have caused him his own death, because usually when an individual is insane they are unaware of what they are saying and their actions are usually always made hastily, a quality that Hamlet does not seem to have.
In act three, he even admits that his actions are insane, horrible and evil. He says, “I essentially am not in madness, but mad in craft” (3.4.191). For Hamlet to admit that his actions are mad or insane, is the most insane trait of Hamlet. For him to openly admit that he is fully aware that his actions are mad, only ignites the flame of his insanity. This quote seals the deal for the reader that Hamlets mind is a wasteland of madness, but also of planned insanity and horrible actions.
Logan Gaertner Mrs. Amon English IV 1 March 2014 Is Hamlet’s Insanity Real? Is Hamlet truly insane? While the play is not extremely clear on the matter and often contradicts itself, many of Hamlet’s wild ramblings and words of nonsense seem to be not the true words of a madman. Hamlet says that he is merely “putting on an antic disposition” (Act 1, Scene 5, Line 181). He admits very early on in the play that his insanity will be nothing more than a ruse to fool those around him.
Hamlet throughout the play seems insane but in reality it is only an act to achieve his goal of killing his father's murderer. Hamlet chooses to go mad so he has an advantage over his opponent and since he is the Prince of Denmark certain behavior is unacceptable, so by faking madness he is able to get away with inappropriate sayings and actions. We can see this when he talks to Claudius, Polonius, Ophelia and his mother. When Hamlet talks to Horatio in the first act he says how he is going to "feign madness" and that:
As the reader, we are to know that Hamlet is only acting crazy so that when he kills Claudius his insanity can be to blame. Also, when Hamlet talks to the actors that will perform the play about his father's death, he acts completely crazy. He says bizarre things and acts not like himself when he is in front of everyone. To the characters they only see him being crazy, but as the reader we see Hamlet talking to Horatio making complete sense. We know that Hamlet was just pretending because he could act crazy then completely know what was going on around him with in the next minute.
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, is known for being a sarcastic and overdramatic showman throughout Shakespeare’s play. His intention in doing this is to hide his true feelings from other characters. From the beginning, Hamlet allows everyone but Horatio to think he is mad, mourning the loss of his father while in actuality plotting his revenge by the advice of the ghost. Later, he even casts out the woman he loves by acting as if he never loved her in the first place. Hamlet’s first demonstrated instance of feigned madness comes in Act II Scene II during his conversation with Polonius. After pretending not to recognize Polonius, Hamlet proceeds to mock him, answering his questions irrationally, and ultimately confirming Polonius’ notion that Hamlet is not sane. This encounter demonstrates the depth and profundity of Hamlet’s mind, almost so much so that it could be debated that Hamlet is truly insane after all.
Throughout the Shakespearian play, Hamlet, the main character is given the overwhelming responsibility of avenging his father’s "foul and most unnatural murder" (I.iv.36). Such a burden can slowly drive a man off the deep end psychologically. Because of this, Hamlet’s disposition is extremely inconsistent and erratic throughout the play. At times he shows signs of uncontrollable insanity. Whenever he interacts with the characters he is wild, crazy, and plays a fool. At other times, he exemplifies intelligence and method in his madness. In instances when he is alone or with Horatio, he is civilized and sane. Hamlet goes through different stages of insanity throughout the story, but his neurotic and skeptical personality amplifies his persona of seeming insane to the other characters. Hamlet comes up with the idea to fake madness in the beginning of the play in order to confuse his enemies. However, for Hamlet to fulfill his duty of getting revenge, he must be totally sane. Hamlet’s intellectual brilliance make it seem too impossible for him to actually be mad, for to be insane means that one is irrational and without any sense. When one is irrational, one is not governed by or according to reason. So, Hamlet is only acting mad in order to plan his revenge on Claudius.