Gun Control: Shoot it Down

761 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of the second amendment

Gun Control:
Shoot it Down

Barack Obama once said, “We’re a nation that believes in the second amendment, and I believe in the second amendment.” The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms. Gun control is redundant and unconstitutional. By enacting gun control you are taking away a person’s second amendment right. Gun control advocates believe that stricter gun laws will keep firearms out of the wrong hands. They are confident that if delinquents do not have the opportunity to get weapons the crime and murder rate will decrease. Gun Control and stricter gun laws absolutely will not make the crime and murder rate decrease.
Approximately 1,500 new gun laws have been familiarized since the Newton Massacre in Connecticut. Of 1,500, only 178 of these laws have passed at least one chamber of legislature. Out of the 178 that passed legislature, only 109 have become a tangible law. Since the Sandy Hook shooting every state has enacted at least one new gun law (Kristen Tate).
Have the laws against drugs kept them out of the states? Then why would it work for guns? People can get their hands on whatever they want if they know the right people. Since 1950, every mass shooting with the exception of one has taken place where carrying firearms is banned. Felons can get a firearm whenever they please. All they have to do is discover someone who is marketing a gun. This way he or she does not have to go to a gun shop and have a background check just to get a gun.
Modern handguns are no longer legal in the UK. In 1996, before the law against handguns was introduced, the rate for international homicide in the UK was 1.12 per year. In 1997, when the law was enacted, it rose to...

... middle of paper ...

...hy Gun Control Can't Eliminate Gun Violence ...." nationaljournal.com. N.p., 18 Feb. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
Kristoff, Nicholas. "Guns and Gun Control- News - Times Topics - The New York Times." nytimes.com. N.p., 14 Dec. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
"11 Facts About Guns | DoSomething.org | Largest organization ...." dosomething.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
"gun contol fact sheet." gunowners.org. N.p., 19 Sept. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
"Gun Facts | About the Gun Facts project." gunfacts.info. N.p., 14 May 1996. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Gun Control is NOT the Answer to Juvenile Crime

    2300 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lee, Robert W. "Gun Report: The Buford Furrow Tragedy." The New American 15 (1999): 33

    Read More

  • Why Gun Safety Should Be Mandatory In School

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Works Cited Delozier, Dave. A.S. & Y.S. Gun safety program taught to elementary school students | 9news.com. 9news.com. N.p., n.d. Web.

    Read More

  • We Must Work to Prevent Mass School Shootings

    1409 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ring, Ray. “Guns R Us.” High Country News (Paonia, Co) Vol. 39, No. 14 Aug. 6 2007:10-17. Sirs Issues Researcher. Web. 6 Oct. 2015.

    Read More

  • An Argument for Gun Control

    2438 Words  | 5 Pages

    Web. The Web. The Web. 6 June 2015. http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/business-career/legal/handgun-laws.

    Read More

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    Carter, Gregg. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment

    1620 Words  | 4 Pages

    “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” - Second Amendment. Throughout history, this sentence of twenty seven words has caused an intense debate. The polemic is that some people claim that a gun control policy is unconstitutional, while others disagree and even say it is necessary in order to reduce crime. Now, what does gun control mean? If it means to analyze who is responsible enough to own a gun by a “Universal Background Check”; that sounds right to everyone. But in the article “What Are Obama’s Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide” published in the National Journal by Matt Vasilogambros. The author states that the “gun-control package” that President Obama proposed “included proposals to ban assault weapons”. A firearm gives you power, to defend yourself or to kill someone else. You make the decision of how will you use that power. The constitution gives you the right to bear arms and any law that tries to revoke this is unconstitutional. If the people allow gun control it will be like opening the door to a tyrannical government, guns are not the problem, is the bad attention towards education, poverty and job opportunities.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Gun Control (CBA)

    435 Words  | 1 Pages

    Of Americans 3% own half the country's 265 million guns, that means each of those 3% own more than one gun. We have the individual right to own and use these arms. Gun control is a big debate in politics right now. I personally do not believe in gun control, i just feel like if a good guy had a gun then he would be able to stop things like shootings from happening. So do organizations like the NRA (National Rifle Association), the GOA (Gun Owners of America), and the SAF (Second Amendment Foundation) “The answer to crime is not gun control, its law enforcement and self-control” (Alan Keyes political activist) This violates our second amendment right of the U.S. constitution to keep and bear arms. So it's all in the best interest that we keep gun control from happening, so that we can keep our second amendment.

    Read More

  • Gun Control in America

    1914 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most controversial topics of the year is the argument on guns and the government attempting to ban and control certain guns. This topic has always been in disagreement among the American public but has recently become much more popular after several large-scale shootings such as the infamous Sandy Hook. Despite gun control appearing to be the solution to these tragic events, controlling and banning guns will simply not work. Why will it not work and why is it so bad? Because it has not worked before, current gun control laws and attempted laws target the wrong guns, banning the targeted guns or any guns for that matter will not prevent mass shootings, and it infringes on our constitutional rights as Americans. Together, we will not only be addressing these issues, but we will provide well thought out answers to many arguments that pro-gun control advocates can retaliate with.

    Read More

  • The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.

    Read More

  • Gun Control: Keeping Guns Out of the Wrong Hands

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    People have questioned gun control long time. Many people wonder if anyone, aside from those who join the law force, should be allowed to carry guns. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Wright 4). Franklin understood that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens would not uphold their liberty. Some people who argue for gun control state many violent crimes involve guns. Others believe a child could find the gun and something bad could happen to the child or others when a gun is unsafely stored. People who argue against gun control might say there is a huge psychological gap between citizens who shoot to protect themselves or their property and those who go into schools and shoot at others. Criminals will always find a way around gun control laws and will be able to obtain and use guns illegally. The second amendment protects gun rights for individual citizens. Reasonable gun control laws and educational steps can be taken to protect the majority of U.S. citizens. Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate. The United States government is attempting to reduce violent crime by controlling the amount of guns on the market, who is allowed to purchase a gun, and what type of gun a person is allowed to purchase. The only people affected by gun control laws are the law-abiding citizen that should be allowed to purchase firearms without the government’s interjection.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay against Gun Control

    1693 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

    1706 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Crux,. 'If You Believe In "Gun Control," This Is Probably Not For You... '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Essay

    917 Words  | 2 Pages

    The opposers of gun control will fight it unconstitutional to take away citizens ' rights to have a gun in their house or with them as they please, but is that literally what the Amendment meant? Let 's all carry around guns so when we feel scared or threatened we can pull it out to scare someone or even hurt them? Definitely not. People for guns will show that in no way does having a gun mean you are going to abuse owning it. That 's not the point. The point is that if something did go wrong in the person 's mind or in a situation, it is easily preventable for them to not go to jail for attempted murder because they pulled out a gun. Phil Dotree tries to explain, "Potential criminals are scared away from home invasions, and other types of crime by the threat of a gun. Tightly controlling gun use could therefore lead to more crime," (Dotree). If the government controlled gun use, how would crime increase? The idea of controlling who buys, and sells guns is not to take them away from defenseless people, but to take them away from the bad guys who make good people feel defenseless. Opposers also argue that the

    Read More

More about Gun Control: Shoot it Down

Open Document