When I was a senior in High School, we spent over two weeks on the topic of “Amendments” and one of the most conflicting topics we covered was gun control, specifically the 2nd Amendment. Today, it’s still one most hotly debated topics in the U.S. and how it applies to the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment states that, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Univ. Law) .Citizens all over the country have made their own interpretations of what the Founding Fathers wrote when giving us the right to bear arms. The debate of gun control laws in the U.S. today relates to the 2nd amendment because the amendment lacks to give clarity to what type of weapon is acceptable, lengths we should take to keep them out of the wrong hands, and the backlash that pro gun advocates to believe limitations are unconstitutional.
During the Vietnam War, more than twice as many Americans were killed with firearms in the U.S. than died in combat. Today, firearms are used in approximately 65% of the 11,000 homicides a year. Suicides are carried out via a gun 57% of the 16,600 a year (“GunCite” 49). These statistics pose the question, “Would there be that many fewer deaths if guns were banned altogether? Or would these deaths occur just the same but by other means?” Studies on both a local and a national level have shown that the majority of murders are committed by those with previous criminal records. The “crimes of passion” are not very common; rather, most murders are planned and therefore would occur no matter what weapon is to be used (“GunCite” 49). However, controlling the guns in America is still an issue that needs to be addressed. Banning guns completely is not what should be done, however; if the government controls guns by other means, then crime will be reduced yet many Americans will still have them to use in recreation and in self defense.
According the Cato Institute the Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. This amendment has different views and one is being able to support the national defense. Another opinion can be read as being able to defend and keep individual’s rights to carry a gun if they decide to do so. In either case the result of this amendment allows the right to defend one's self as a basic human right, and banning guns would deprive law-abiding citizens of the ability to defend themselves. According to the constitution gun ownership is protected and justified just like freedom of speech and religion has been in the Bill of Right’s.
According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. This is still a big issue in today 's society as we are in the 21st century the use of guns has changed significantly. The fact that crime has increased and that the right to own a handgun has been a hot issue have made many Americans question whether gun and crime are directly related. The issue of gun control, in an attempt to reduce crime rates in The United States has also been a topic of discussion that seems to have many people divided on the issue. Even though many people believe gun control violates the right to bear arms which is in the constitution, Americans know that more strict rules need to be put in place to because of
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, that since there is a necessity for a Free State and regulated militia, the right of the American people to keep and bear arms would not be infringed by the United States government. One cannot stop and wonder the calamities that are caused by guns in their completely proper usage. This nation needs to have a talk over its malignant obsession with guns.
America is the most well armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Rauch) This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is relatively vague, it is up for interpretation, and is often used by gun advocates to argue for lenient gun laws. Hence, gun control is a frequently discussed controversial topic in American politics.
The Second Amendment states that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The way the Supreme Court interprets this amendment changes constantly because not even the Supreme Court fully understands the limits and rights given to citizens. Some argue that this amendment protects our right to own a gun, but is not very clear. Over the years the second amendment has become a huge debate over gun rights and gun control. This is a cause of all the gun violence this country has been facing for many years and they need a way to help prevent gun violence or even suppress the amount of deaths faced by these tragedies. One of the ways this country has been trying to deal with gun control is background checks. A background consists of this, when someone goes to a federally licensed gun dealer, the dealer is required by federal law to run a background check under their name. The dealer submits their name through a federal database system that consists of criminal and mentally ill records. It then reports back to the dealer and states whether or not the consumer has passed the background check and is eligible to legally purchase a gun (Martinez). Background checks are a great but they need to be strengthened and the loop holes have to be fixed. Having stricter background checks is a necessity to decreasing firearm fatalities.
The topic of gun control is very popular and controversial in our country. Currently one of the biggest debates being discussed is; should the citizens of the United States of America be allowed to own or posses hand guns or rifles for personal protection and or sport. The controversy is about the interpretation of the 2nd amendment and what it’s true meaning is. It really comes down to whether or not ordinary citizens should be allowed to own guns for personal protection and or sport purposes. The 2nd amendment reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Many people have their own interpretation of the meaning of the 2nd amendment
The topic of stricter gun control laws has caused quite the controversy over the past couple of years, two sides with completely opposing arguments have been in major conflict on who and who shouldn’t have access to guns. If you take a moment to look at the direction our country is going it should be clearly obvious that we in no way need these stricter gun laws, it goes way beyond just the wants of some but more importantly, the effects that passing a much stricter law would cause in the long run. According to the second amendment of the United States Constitution, every law abiding citizen has the right to keep and bear arms at their will. The Second Amendment was based on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Bill of Rights). This is the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution. This is a document that grants all Americans certain inalienable rights. All citizens no matter their age or standing in society have some understanding of the Bill of Rights and the freedoms that it allows. One freedom that is granted to us, the right to bear arms, has become the center of a heated issue in today’s society and many years before. The majority of citizens have felt the impacts of guns, either positive or negative, during some point of their life. It is because of the fact that guns are a part of numerous American’s lives that we must ask: is gun control needed for the protection of Americans or for the empowerment of the government through the removal of Americans rights.